Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 6:2 (1979) ► pp.199–230

The History of General and Comparative Linguistics in 19th Century Russia

| USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow
The article attempts to demonstrate how problems in general and historical-comparative linguistics were worked out and developed during the 19th century in Russia. Largely following the tradition established by 18th-century Russian scholars, especially M. V. Lomonosov (1711–65), who is regarded as the founder of Russian linguistics, 19th-century linguists displayed a lively interest in investigating the social nature of language. Other key interests of these scholars were the study of the systematic character of language, the development of the phonemic principle (including the distinctive feature concept), the typological study of related and unrelated languages, etc. It is shown that their work generally mirrored the intellectual trends of their period, with biologistic views giving way to sociological and psychological ones, as is evident in the work of N. I. Greč, A. X. Vostokov, A. A. Potebnja, J. Baudouin de Courtenay, F. F. Fortuna-tov, and many others. The intellectual climate of 19th-century Europe allowed for a free exchange of scientific information; thus, in its earlier stages, the Russian scientific scene was sometimes influenced by ideas from the West, whereas it can be said that Russian scholars working in linguistics paid back toward the end of the 19th and in the earlier 20th centuries by furthering research leading to a structural concept of language, the study of morphophonology, typology and language universals as is evident in the theories advanced by members of the Prague and Copenhagen schools.
Published online: 1 January 1979
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.6.2.05ber
References (63)
References
I have included, in addition to items referred to in the text, bibliographical data in an effort to show the vast scope of work on the history of linguistics carried out in the Soviet Union in the hope that Western scholars may find them useful.
Baudouin de Courtenay, I(van) A(leksandrovič) (= Jan Ignacy Niecisɫaw. , 1845–1929). 1963. Izbrannye trudy po obščemu jazykoznaniju (Collected Works on General Linguistics). Ed. by S. G. Barxudarov et al. 21 vols. Moscow: Akad. Nauk.Google Scholar
Belinskij, V(issarion) G(rigor’evič. , 1811–48). 1837. Osnovanija russkoi grammatiku dlja pervonacal’nogo obučenija (Foundations of Russian Grammar for Elementary Study). St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
Berezin, F(jodor) M(ixajlovič). 1968. Očerki po istorii jazykoznanija v Rossii (konec XIX – načalo XX v.). (Sketches in the History of Linguistics in Russia (end 19th – beginning 20th century)). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
. 1973. Xrestomatija po istorii russkogo jazykoznanija (Chrestomathy in the history of Russian linguistics). Moscow: Vysšaya škola. (2nd ed., 1976.) [Cf. T. M. S. Priestly’s review article in HL 4:1.69–88 (1977).]Google Scholar
. 1974. “Russkoje teoreticeskoe jazykoznanie v Akademii Nauk (Russian Theoretical Linguistics in the Akademy of Sciences). VJa 23:3.14–26.Google Scholar
. 1975. htorija lingvističeskix učenij (History of Linguistic Studies). Moscow: Vysšaya škola.Google Scholar
. 1976. Russkoe jazykoznanie konca XIX-načala XX v. (Russian Linguistics of the End of the 19th and Beginning of the 20th centuries). Moscow: Nauka. [Cf. J. Boyadjiev’s review in HL 4:3.388–91 (1977).]Google Scholar
. 1979. Itorija russkogo jazykoznanija (The History of Russian Linguistics). Moscow: Vysšaya škola.Google Scholar
Berezin, F(jodor) M(ixajlovič), and B(oris) N(ikolaevič) Golovin. 1979. Obščee jazykoznanie (General Linguistics). Moscow: Prosveščenie.Google Scholar
Bogorodickij, V(asilij) A(lekseevič, 1857–1941). 1890. Einige Reformvorschläge auf dem Gebiete der vergleichenden Grammatik der indo-europäischen Sprachen. Kazan: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
, 1857–1941). 1915. Leckit po obščemu jazykovedeniju (Lectures on general linguistics). Kazan: Tipo-Litografia Imp. univ.Google Scholar
Brückner, A(lexander, 1856–1939). 1917. “Slawisch Litauisch.” Geschichte der Indogermanischen Sprachwissenschaft ed. by Wilhelm Streitberg, vol. III1, 1–107. Berlin & Leipzig: W. de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bulaxov, M(ixail) G(apeevič). 1976. Vostočnoslavjanskie jazykovedy: Biobibliografičeskij slovar’ (East Slavic linguists: A biobibliographical dictionary). Minsk: Izd-vo BGU im. V. I. Lenina. [Tome I: A-Z (XVI – the end of the XlXth century) – cf. HL 3:3.385–86 (1976); Tome II: A-K – cf. HL 5:1/2.207–08 (1978), Tome III: L-Z (the end of the 19th to the 70s of the 20th century – cf.HL 5:3.355 (1978).]Google Scholar
Buslaev, F(edor) I(vanovič, 1818–97). 1858. Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka (Historical Grammar of Russian). Moscow: Izd. Moskovskogo Univ.Google Scholar
, 1818–97). 1844. O prepodavanii rodnogo jazyka (On teaching the native language). Moscow: Izd. Moskovskogo Univ.Google Scholar
Collinder, B(jörn). 1962. Les origines du structuralisme. (= Acta Universatis Uppsaliensis; Nova series, 1.) Stockholm & Uppsala: Almqvist & Wikseil.Google Scholar
Cerepanov, M(ixail) V(asil’evič). 1967. Kazanskaja linguističeskaja škola (The linguistic school of Kazan). (= Uč. zapiski leningradskogo pedagogočeskogo instituta im. A. I. Gercena, No. 354.) Leningrad: Izd-vo Leningrad, gos. ped.instituta.Google Scholar
Fortunatov, F(ilip) F(edorovič 1848–1914). 1956. Izbrannye trudy (Collected Works). 21 vols. Moscow: Akad. Nauk.Google Scholar
Grekov, B(oris) D(mitr’evič 1882–1953), ed. 1948. Dokumenty k istorii slavjanovedenija v Rossii (1850–1912) (Documents for the history of Slavistics in Russia (1850–1912)) Moscow: Akad. Nauk.Google Scholar
Godel, Robert. 1957. Les Sources manuscrites du Cours de linguistique générale de F. de Saussure. Geneva. Droz.Google Scholar
Greč, N(ikolai) I(vanovič 1787–1867). 1827. Praktčeskaja russkaja grammatika (Practical Russian Grammar). St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
Häusler, Frank. 1968. Das Problem Phonetik und Phonologie bei Baudouin de Courtenay und in seiner Nachfolge. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis (1899–1965). 1928. Principes de grammaire générale. Copenhagen: F. A. Høst.Google Scholar
Jakob, Ljudvig Genrix (= Ludwig Heinrich, 1759–1827). 1812. Načertanie vseoščeij grammatiki dlja gimnazij Rossijskoi imperii sočinennoe (Sketch of a general grammar, composed for grammar schools of the Russian Empire). St. Petersburg: Imp. Akad. Nauk.Google Scholar
Kacnel’son, S(olomon) D(avidovič). 1954. “Teorija sonantov F.F. Fortunatova i ee značenie v svete sovremennyx dannyx (F. F. Fortunatov’s Theory of Sonants and its importance in the light of modern data).” VJa No. 61.47–61.Google Scholar
Katkov, M(ixail) N(ikiforovič 1818–87). 1845. Ob elementax i formax slavjanorusskogo jazyka (On the elements and forms of the Slav-Russian language). Moscow: Izd. Moskovskogo Univ.Google Scholar
Klausenburger, Jurgen. 1978. “Mikoɫaj Kruszewski’s Theory of Morphophology”. HL 5:1/2.109–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korš, F(edor) E(vgen’evič, 1843–1915). 1877. Sposoby otnositel’nogo podčinenija: Glava iz sravnitel’nogo sintaxisa (Means of relative subordination: A chapter from comparative syntax). Moscow: Izd. Moskovskogo Univ.Google Scholar
Kruszewski, N(ikolai) V(jačeslavovič) (= Mikoɫaj Habdank, 1851–87). 1883. Očerk nauki o jazyke (Sketches of the Science of Language). Kazan: Izd. Imp. Univ.Google Scholar
Kuryɫbwicz, J(erzy, 1895–1978). 1960. Esquisses linguistiques. Wrocɫaw & Krakow: Ossolineum.Google Scholar
Lebedeff, G(erasim) S(tepanovič, 1749–1820). 1801. A Grammar of the Pure and Mixed Dialects, spoken in all the eastern countries. Methodologically arranged at Calcutta, according to the Brahmenian system, of the Shamscrit language. London: J. S.Kirven.Google Scholar
Loja, J(an) V(iljumovič 1896–1969). 1968. Istorija lingvističeskix učenij (History of Linguistic Studies). Moscow: Vysšaja škola.Google Scholar
Lomonosov, M(ixail) V(asil’evič 1711–65). 1755. Rossijskaja Grammatika (Russian Grammar.) (Repr. in Polnoe sobranie socinenij (Complete Collection of Works). Moscow & Leningrad: Nauka, 1952.)Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine (1866–1936). 1930. [Obituary of Baudouin de Courtenay]. Revue des études slaves 10:1/2.Google Scholar
Meščaninov, I(van) I(vanovič, 1883–1967). 1949. Kistorii otečestvennogo jazykoznanija (Towards a history of native linguistics). Moscow: Učebno-pedagogičeskoe izd-vo.Google Scholar
Meščerskij, N(ikita) A(leksandrovič), ed. 1971. Russkoe jazykoznanie v Peter-burgskom-Leningradskom universitete (Russian Linguistics at the St. Petersburg-Leningrad University). Leningrad: Izd-vo LGU.Google Scholar
Obnorskij, S(ergei) P(etrovič 1888–1962), ed. 1947. A. A. Šaxmatov (1864–1920). Moscow & Leningrad: Akad. Nauk.Google Scholar
Ornatovskij, I(van) (? – ?). 1811. Noveijšee načertanie pravil rossijskoj grammatiki, na načalax vseoščej osnovannyx (The newest account of the rules of the Russian grammar, composed on those of a general grammar). Xarkov: Izd. Univ.Google Scholar
Pavskij, G(erasim) P(etrovič 1787–1863). 1841–42. Filologičeskie nabljudenija nad sostavom russkogo jazyka (Philological observations on the structure of the Russian language). St. Petersburg: Tip. Imp. Akad. Nauk.Google Scholar
Pokrovskij, M(ixail) M(ixajlovič, 1869–1942). 1895. O važnosti sravnitel’nogo jazykoznanija dlja classičeskoj filologii (On the importance of comparative linguistics for classic philology). Moscow.Google Scholar
, 1869–1942). 1896. O metodax semasiologii (On the methods in semasiology). Moscow.Google Scholar
Potebnja, A(leksandr) A(fanasjevič 1835–91). 1862. Mysli jazyk (Thought and Language). St. Petersburg: Tip. Ogrizko.Google Scholar
1835–91). 1872. Iz zapisokpo Russkoi grammatike (Memoirs on Russian grammar). Xarkov: Tip. Universiteta.Google Scholar
Radiščev, A(leksandr) N(ikolaevič, 1749–1802). 1792. O čeloveke, o jego smert-nosti i bessmertii (On man, on his death and immortality). Repr. in Collected Works on Philosophy, Moscow: Gos. učebno-pedagog. izd-vo, 1949.)Google Scholar
Rižskij, I(van) S(tepanovič, 1761–1811). 1806. Vvedenie v krug slovesnosti (Introduction to the field of philology). Xarkov: Imp. Akad. Nauk.Google Scholar
Rudelev, V(ladimir) G(eorgievič), ed. 1975. Russkie jazykovedy (Russian Linguists). Tambov: Gos. ped. institute. [Cf. HL 3:1.150 (1976).]Google Scholar
Ruszkiewicz, P(iotr). 1973. “Baudouin de Courtenay and the Theory of Distinctive Features”. BFon 141.91–99.Google Scholar
Smirnov, S(avvatij) V(asil’evič). 1971. F. I. Buslaev i russkoe jazykoznanie pervoj poloviny XIX v. (F. I. Buslaev and Russian linguistics of the first half of the 19th century). (= Uč. zapiski Tartusskogo universiteta, vypusk 279.) Tartu: Izd. univ.Google Scholar
Sommerfelt, A(lf) (1892–1965). 1961. “The French School of Linguistics”. Trends in European and American Linguistics ed. by Christine Mohrmann et al., 283–93. Utrecht & Antwerp: Spectrum.Google Scholar
Sreznevskij, I(smail) I(vanovič 1812–80). 1850. Mysli ob istorü russkogo jazyka (Thoughts on the history of the Russian language). St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
Stieber, Z. 1955. “Teorija fonem Boduena de Kurtene v sovremennom jazy-koznanii (Baudouin de Courtenay’s theory of phonemes in modern linguistics).” VJa 41:89–93.Google Scholar
Šaxmatov, A(leksei) A(lexandrovič 1864–1920), 1925. Syntaksis russkogo jazyka (Syntax of Russian). Moscow: Akad. Nauk.Google Scholar
Šercl, V(ikentij) I(vanovič, 1843–1906). 1884. O slovax s protivopoložnym značeniem (On words with opposite meaning). Voronež.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, H(ugo, 1842–1927). 1925. “Der Individualismus in der Sprachforschung”. Akad. d. Wissenschaften in Wien; Philosophisch-historische Klasse, Sitzungberichte 2041. Bd.21. Abhandl. 11.1–24.Google Scholar
Ščerba, L(ev) V(ladimirovič 1880–1944), 1963. “F. F. Fortunatov v istorii nauki o jazyke”. VJa 12:5.89–93. [Transl, by T. M. S. Priestly, “F. F. Fortunatovin the History of the Science of Language”, HL 3:1.129–39 (1976).]Google Scholar
1880–1944). 1930. “I A. Boduèn de Kurtenè i ego značenie v nauke o jazyke (J. I. Baudouin de Courtenay and his importance in the science of language)”. (Published in L. V. Scerba, Izbrannye trudy po russkomu jazyku, Moscow: Prosveščenie, 1957.)Google Scholar
Timkovskij, I(l’ja) F(edorovič, 1772–1853). 1811. Opytnij sposob k filosofi-českomu poznaniju russkogo jazyka (An experimental way to the philosophical study of Russian). St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
Vinogradov, V(iktor) V(ladimirovič 1895–1969). 1975. Izbrannye trudy: Issledovanija po russkoi grammatike (Collected works: Studies in Russian grammar). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
1895–1969). 1958. Iz istorii izučenija russkogo sintaksisa (ot Lomonosova do Potebni i Fortunatova) (From the History of the Study of Russian Syntax. From Lomonosov to Potebnja and Fortunatov). Moscow: Izd. Moskovskogo Univ.Google Scholar
1895–1969). ed. 1963. Pis’ma I. V. Jagiča k russkim učenym (1865–1886) (V. Jagič’s letters to Russian scientists (1865–1886)). Moscow & Leningrad: Akad. Nauk.Google Scholar
Vostokov, A(leksandr) X(ristoforovič 1781–1864). 1820. Rassuždenie o slav-janskom jazyke, služaščee vvedeniem k grammatike sego jazyka, sostavljaemoj po drevnejšim onogo pis’mennym pamjatnikam (Discourse on the Slavic language, serving as an introduction to the grammar of this language composed according to the oldest written monuments of the same). St. Petersburg: Trudy obščestva ljub’it’el’ei rossijskoi slovesnosti.Google Scholar
Zeleneckij, K(onstantin) P(etrovič 1812–58). 1841. Sistema u soderžanie philo-sofskogo jazykočenija primenitel’no k russkomu jazyku (System and contents of philosophical linguistics with special reference to Russian). St. Petersburg: Tip. Rossijskoi Akademii.Google Scholar
Zinder, L(ev) R(afailovtč). 1960. “Kistorii fonetiki v Rossii (Towards a history of phonetics in Russia). Voprosy fonetiki 21. (= Uč. zapiski Leningradskogo universiteta, No. 237, serija fil. nauk, vypusk 40), 5–25. Leningrad: Izd. Leningradskogo Univ.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

[no author supplied]
2020. Chapter 8. The Baxtin myth and its historiography. In Last Papers in Linguistic Historiography [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 128], ► pp. 194 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.