Part of
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 9:1/2 (1982) ► pp.179184
References (20)
References
Allen, W. Sidney. 1955. “Zero and Pānini”. Indian Linguistics 161.106–113.Google Scholar
Bloch, Bernard. 1949. “Leonard Bloomfield”. Language 251.87–94.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1926. “A Set of Postulates for the Science of Language”. Language 21.153–64. (Repr. in Bloomfield 1970.128–38.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1927. “On Some Rules of Pānini”. JAOS 471.61–70. (Repr. in Bloomfield 1970.157–65.)Google Scholar
. 1929. Review of Bruno Liebich, Konkordanz Pānini-Candra (Breslau: M. & H. Marcus, 1928). Language 51.267–76. (Repr. in Bloomfield 1970.219–226.)Google Scholar
. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
. 1939. “Menomini Morphophonemics”. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 81.105–15. (Repr. in Bloomfield 1970.351–62.)Google Scholar
. 1970. A Leonard Bloomfield Anthology. Ed. by Charles F. Hockett. Bloomington & London: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Cardona, George. 1976. Pānini: A survey of research. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulson, Michael. 1976. Sanskrit. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 1980. A First Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. London: A. Deutsch.Google Scholar
Hall, Robert A., Jr. 1950. “In Memoriam Leonard Bloomfield (April 1,1877 – April 18, 1949)”. Lingua 21.117–23. (Repr. in Bloomfield 1970.547–53.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kielhorn, Franz (1840–1908), ed. 1880–85. The Vyākarana-mahābhāsya of Patañjali 31 vols. Bombay: Government Central Book Depot. (References to third edition, by Kaśinath V. Abhyankar, Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 1962–72.)Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1968. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. (References to 1977 reprint.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pānini. Astādhyāyī See Śrīśa Chandra Vasu 1891.Google Scholar
Patañjali. Mahābhāsya. See Kielhorn 1880–85.Google Scholar
Roodbergen, Jouthe A. F. 1974. Patañjali’s Vyākarana-Mahābhāsya, Bahuvrī-dvandvāhnika (P.2.2.23–2.2.38): Text, translation and notes. Poona: Univ. of Poona.Google Scholar
Staal, Johan Frederik. 1972. A Reader on the Sanskrit Grammarians. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vasu, Śrīśa Chandra (1861–1918?). 1891. The Astādhyāyī of Pānini. Edited and Translated into English. Allahabad: The Pānini Office. (References to second reprint, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1977.)Google Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight (1827–94). 1893. “On Recent Studies in Hindu Grammar”. American Journal of Philology 141.171–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Sulich-Cowley, Małgorzata
2023. The Role of Superimposition in the Semantics of Negative Compounds in Sanskrit. In Guruparamparā. Studies on Buddhism, India, Tibet and More in Honour of Professor Marek Mejor, DOI logo
Sulich-Cowley, Małgorzata
2023. Kauṇḍabhaṭṭa’s View on Negation in the Nañarthanirṇaya of the Vaiyākaraṇabhūṣaṇasāra. Acta Asiatica Varsoviensia 36  pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Noordegraaf, Jan
1989. From the history of the term ‘exocentric’. Historiographia Linguistica 16:1-2  pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Rogers, David E.
1987. The influence of Pānini on Leonard Bloomfield. Historiographia Linguistica 14:1-2  pp. 89 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.