Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: 22nd Annual Installment
Edited by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren
[Handbook of Pragmatics 22] 2019
► pp. 115–148

Lexically triggered veridicality inferences

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Variation in lexically triggered veridicality inferences
    • 2.1Variation relative to entailment cancelling operators
      • 2.1.1Matrix negation
      • 2.1.2Conditionals and interrogatives
      • 2.1.3Modal elements
    • 2.2Other conditions on variation
      • 2.2.1Other semantic operators
      • 2.2.2Contextual conditions on variation
  • 3.Explanatory approaches
    • 3.1Conventionalist approaches
      • 3.1.1Factive inferences
        • 3.1.1.1Common ground approaches
        • 3.1.1.2Anaphoric approaches
      • 3.1.2Implicative inferences
    • 3.2Conversationalist approaches
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 23 December 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.22.lex4
References (151)
References
Abbott, Barbara. 2000. “Presuppositions as nonassertions.” Journal of Pragmatics 32 (10): 1419–1437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Where have some of the presuppositions gone.” In Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn, ed. by G. L. Ward and B. J. Birner, 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Abrusán, Márta. 2011. “Predicting the presuppositions of soft triggers.” Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (6): 491–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “Presupposition cancellation: Explaining the ‘Soft-Hard’ trigger distinction.” Natural Language Semantics 24 (2): 165–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abusch, Dorit. 2002. “Lexical alternatives as a source of pragmatic presuppositions.” Semantics and Linguistic Theory 12: 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Presupposition triggering from alternatives.” Journal of Semantics 27 (1): 37–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anand, Pranav and Valentine Hacquard. 2014. “Factivity, belief and discourse.” In The Art and Craft of Semantics: A Festschrift for Irene Heim (Vol. 1), ed. byLuka Crnič and Uli Sauerland, 69–90. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Asher, Nicholas. 1993. Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, Vol. 50). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. “Truth conditional discourse semantics for parentheticals.” Journal of Semantics 17 (1): 31–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baglini, Rebekah and Itamar Francez. 2016. “The implications of managing.” Journal of Semantics 33 (3): 541–560. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beaver, David. 1995. “Presupposition and assertion in dynamic semantics.” Ms., University of Edinburgh.
. 2010. “Have you noticed that your belly button lint colour is related to the colour of your clothing.” In Presuppositions and Discourse: Essays Offered to Hans Kamp (Current Research in the Semantics / Pragmatics Interface 21), ed. byRainer Bauerle, Uwe Reyle and Thomas Zimmermann, 65–100. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Beaver, David and Brady Clark. 2008. Sense and Sensitivity: How Focus Determines Meaning. (Explorations in Semantics, Vol. 5). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beaver, David I., Craige Roberts, Mandy Simons and Judith Tonhauser. 2017. “Questions under discussion: Where information structure meets projective content.” Annual Review of Linguistics 3: 265–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beaver, David and Henk Zeevat. 2007. “Accommodation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, ed. by Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh. 1999. “Covert modality in non-finite contexts.” Ms., University of Pennsylvania.
Boër, Steven E. and William G. Lycan. 1976. “The myth of semantic presupposition.” Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 1–90.Google Scholar
Bogal-Allbritten, Elizabeth A. 2016. “Building meaning in Navajo.” Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Borgonovo, Claudia and Sarah Cummins. 2007. “Tensed modals.” In Coreference, Modality, and Focus: Studies on the Syntax–Semantics Interface, ed. by Luis Eguren and Olga Fernández-Soriano, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Cattell, Ray. 1978. “On the source of interrogative adverbs.” Language 54: 61–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chemla, Emmanuel. 2009. “Presuppositions of quantified sentences: Experimental data.” Natural Language Semantics 17 (4): 299–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Similarity: Towards a unified account of scalar implicatures, free choice permission and presupposition projection.” Ms., Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris.
Chierchia, Gennaro and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1990. Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, Linda. 1975. “The case of the vanishing presupposition.” Papers from the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 1:78–89.Google Scholar
Copley, Bridget. 2019. “Force dynamics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Event Structure, ed. by Robert Truswell, 137–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Djärv, Kajsa and Hezekiah Akiva Bacovcin. 2017. “Prosodic effects on factive presupposition projection.” Semantics and Linguistic Theory 27:116–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Djärv, Kajsa, Jérémy Zehr and Florian Schwarz. 2018. “Cognitive vs. emotive factives: An experimental differentiation.” In Proceedings of Sinn Und Bedeutung 21, ed. by Robert Truswell, Chris Cummins, Caroline Heycock, Brian Rabern and Hannah Rohde, 367–85. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Dudley, Rachel. 2017. “The role of input in discovering presuppositions triggers: Figuring out what everybody already knew.” Ms., College Park, MD: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Egré, Paul. 2008. “Question-embedding and factivity.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 77 (1): 85–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Falk, Ingrid and Fabienne Martin. 2017. “Towards an inferential lexicon of event selecting predicates for French.” In IWCS 2017 – 12th International Conference on Computational Semantics – Long Papers.Google Scholar
Farudi, Annahita. 2007. “An antisymmetric approach to Persian clausal complements.” Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Frank, Michael C. and Noah D. Goodman. 2012. “Predicting pragmatic reasoning in language games.” Science 336 (6084): 998–998. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1997 [1892]. “On Sinn Und Bedeutung.” In The Frege Reader, ed. by Michael Beaney, 151–71. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald. 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Geis, Michael L. and Arnold M. Zwicky. 1971. “On invited inferences.” Linguistic Inquiry 2 (4): 561–66.Google Scholar
Geurts, Bart. 1994. “Presupposing.” Ms., Universität Osnabrück.
. 1998. “Presuppositions and anaphors in attitude contexts.” Linguistics and Philosophy 21 (6): 545–601. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1994. “The Semantic Licensing of NPIs and the Modern Greek Subjunctive.” In Yearbook of the Research Group for Theoretical and Experimental Linguistics (Vol. 4), ed. byAle de Boer, Helen de Hoop and Henriette de Swart, 55–68. Language and Cognition. University of Groningen.Google Scholar
. 1998. Polarity Sensitivity as (Non) Veridical Dependency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. “Affective dependencies.” Linguistics and Philosophy 22 (4): 367–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “Varieties of polarity items and the (non) veridicality hypothesis.” In Perspectives on Negation and Polarity Items, 99–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “The dependency of the subjunctive revisited: Temporal semantics and polarity.” Lingua 119 (12): 1883–1908. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia and Alda Mari. to appear. Veridicality in Grammar and Thought: Modality, Propositional Attitudes and Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Giannakidou, Anastasia and Eleni Staraki. 2013. “Rethinking ability: Ability as modality and ability as action.” In Genericity, ed. by Alda Mari, 250--275. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1973. “The time-axis phenomenon.” Language 49 (4): 890–925. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glass, Lelia. under review. “The negatively biased Mandarin belief verb yıwei.” Ms.
Goldberg, Adele E. 2013. “Constructionist approaches.” In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, ed. by Thomas Hoffmann and Graeme Trousdale. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Noah D. and Andreas Stuhlmüller. 2013. “Knowledge and implicature: Modeling language understanding as social cognition.” Topics in Cognitive Science 5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grano, Thomas. 2012. “Control and restructuring at the syntax-semantics interface.” Ms., University of Chicago.
. in prep. Attitude Reports. Key Topics in Semantics and Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof. 1984. “Studies on the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers.” Ms., University of Amsterdam.
Hacquard, Valentine. to appear. “Actuality entailments.” In Companion to Semantics, ed. by L. Matthewson, C. Meier, H. Rullmann and T. E. Zimmermann. London: Wiley.
. 2006. “Aspects of modality.” Ms., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
. 2008. “Restructuring and implicative properties of volere.” In Proceedings of Sinn Und Bedeutung (Vol. 12), ed. byAtle Grønn, 165–79. Oslo: ILOS.Google Scholar
. 2009. “On the interaction of aspect and modal auxiliaries.” Linguistics and Philosophy 32 (3): 279–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamblin, Charles L. 1973. “Questions in Montague English.” Foundations of Language 10 (1): 41–53.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1982. “The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases.” Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
. 1983a. “File change semantics and the familiarity theory of definiteness.” In Meaning, Use, and the Interpretation of Language, ed. by Rainer B¨auerle, Christoph Schwarze and Arnim von Stechow, 164–89. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 1983b. “On the projection problem for presuppositions.” In Second Annual West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. by M. Barlow, D. Flickinger and M. Westcoat, 114–26. Stanford University.Google Scholar
. 1992. “Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs.” Journal of Semantics 9 (3): 183–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Homer, Vincent. 2010. “Actuality entailments in french: a case of aspectual coercion.” In Proceedings of WCCFL 28:455–80.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. 1975. “On assertive predicates.” In Syntax and Semantics (Vol. 4), ed. byJohn P. Kimball, 91–124. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1973. “On the applicability of root transformations.” Linguistic Inquiry 4 (4): 465–497.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence. 1972. “On the semantic properties of logical operators in English.” Ms., UCLA.
. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. University of Chicago Press Chicago.Google Scholar
Hunter, Julie. 2016. “Reports in discourse.” Dialogue & Discourse 7 (4).Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans and Uwe Reyle. 1993. From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Model-Theoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, Vol. 42). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri. 1971a. “Implicative verbs.” Language 47: 340–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1971b. “Some observations on factivity.” Papers in Linguistics 4 (1): 55–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1973. “Presuppositions of compound sentences.” Linguistic Inquiry 4 (2): 169–193.Google Scholar
. 1974. “Presupposition and linguistic context.” Theoretical Linguistics 1 (1–3): 181–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1977. “Syntax and semantics of questions.” Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (1): 3–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Simple and phrasal implicatives.” In Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics, 124–31. Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 2013. “You will be lucky to break even.” In From Quirky Case to Representing Space: Papers in Honor of Annie Zaenen, ed. by Tracy Holloway King and Valeria dePaiva, 167–80.Google Scholar
. 2016. “Presupposition: What went wrong?” Semantics and Linguistic Theory 26: 705–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri and Stanley Peters. 1979. “Conventional implicature.” In Syntax and Semantics (Vol. 11), ed. by C-K. Oh and D. Dineen, 1–56. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri, Stanley Peters, Annie Zaenen and Cleo Condoravdi. 2014. “The chameleon-like nature of evaluative adjectives.” In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics (Vol. 10), ed. byChristopher Piñón, 233–50. Paris: CSSP-CNRS.Google Scholar
Kastner, Itamar. 2015. “Factivity mirrors interpretation: The selectional requirements of presuppositional verbs.” Lingua 164: 156–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. and Terence Langendoen. 1976. “Pragmatics and presupposition.” Language 52 (1): 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kay, Paul. 1992. “The inheritance of presuppositions.” Linguistics and Philosophy 15 (4): 333–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kempson, Ruth M. 1975. Presupposition and the Delimitation of Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul and Carol Kiparsky. 1970. “Fact.” In Progress in Linguistics: A Collection of Papers, ed. by Manfred Bierwisch and Karl Erich Heidolph, 143–73. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Koev, Todor. 2018. “Parentheticality, assertion strength, and discourse.” In Proceedings of Sinn Und Bedeutung (Vol. 21), ed. byRobert Truswell, Chris Cummins, Caroline Heycock, Brian Rabern and Hannah Rohde, 679–94. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 2006. “Decomposing attitude verbs.” Ms., The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Langendoen, D. Terence and Harris Savin. 1971. “The projection problem for presuppositions.” In Studies in Linguistic Semantics, ed. by Charles Fillmore and D. Terence Langendoen, 373–388. New York: Holt, Reinhardt and Winston.Google Scholar
Lee, Kenton, Yoav Artzi, Yejin Choi and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2015. “Event detection and factuality assessment with non-expert supervision.” In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1643–1648. Lisbon, Portugal: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Leusen, Noor van. 2012. “The accommodation potential of implicative verbs.” In Logic, Language and Meaning, ed. by Maria Aloni, Vadim Kimmelman, Floris Roelofsen, Galit W. Sassoon, Katrin Schulz and Matthijs Westera, 7218:421–30. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. 1969. Convention: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 1979. “Scorekeeping in a language game.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1): 339–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lotan, Amnon, Asher Stern and Ido Dagan. 2013. “Truthteller: Annotating predicate truth.” In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 752–757. Atlanta, Georgia: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
MacCartney, Bill. 2009. “Natural language inference.” Ms., Stanford University.
Mari, Alda and Fabienne Martin. 2007. “Tense, abilities and actuality entailment.” In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Amsterdam Colloquium, ed. by Maria Aloni, Paul Dekker and Floris Roelofsen, 151–56. Amsterdam: ILLC/Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam, Palteam.Google Scholar
Marneffe, Marie-Catherine de, Christopher D. Manning and Christopher Potts. 2012. “Did it happen? The pragmatic complexity of veridicality assessment.” Computational Linguistics 38 (2): 301–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1980. “Circumscription – a form of non-monotonic reasoning.” Artificial Intelligence 13 (1–2): 27–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Jerry L. 1969. “On the treatment of presupposition in transformational grammar.” In Papers from Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. by R. Binnick et al., 167–177. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Moulton, Keir. 2009. “Natural selection and the syntax of clausal complementation.” Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Nadathur, Prerna. 2016. “Causal necessity and sufficiency in implicativity.” Semantics and Linguistic Theory 26: 1002–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nairn, Rowan, Cleo Condoravdi and Lauri Karttunen. 2006. “Computing relative polarity for textual inference.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Inference in Computational Semantics (ICoS-5), 20–21. Buxton, England: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1969. “English aspectual verbs.” In Studies in Linguistics and Language Learning (Vol. 6). Seattle, WA: University of Washington.Google Scholar
Ozyildiz, Deniz. 2017. “Attitude reports with and without true belief.” Semantics and Linguistic Theory 27:397–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavlick, Ellie and Chris Callison-Burch. 2016. “Tense manages to predict implicative behavior in verbs.” In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2225–2229. Austin, Texas: Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Qing, Ciyang, Noah D. Goodman and Daniel Lassiter. 2016. “A rational speech-act model of projective content.” In Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Roberts, Craige. 1996. “Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics.” Working Papers in Linguistics-Ohio State University Department of Linguistics 91–136.Google Scholar
Romoli, Jacopo. 2011. “The presuppositions of soft triggers aren’t presuppositions.” Semantics and Linguistic Theory 21: 236–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “The presuppositions of soft triggers are obligatory scalar implicatures.” Journal of Semantics 32 (2): 173–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rooth, Mats. 1992. “A theory of focus interpretation.” Natural Language Semantics 1 (1): 75–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1973. “Slifting.” In The Formal Analysis of Natural Languages, ed. by Maurice Gross, Morris Halle and Marcel-Paul Schützenberger, 133–69. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roussou, Anna. 2010. “Selecting complementizers.” Lingua 120 (3): 582–603. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rudinger, Rachel, Aaron Steven White and Benjamin Van Durme. 2018. “Neural models of factuality.” In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers), 731–744. New Orleans, Louisiana: Association for Computational Linguistics. [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1905. “On denoting.” Mind 14 (56): 479–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saurí, Roser and James Pustejovsky. 2009. “FactBank: A corpus annotated with event factuality.” Language Resources and Evaluation 43 (3): 227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Are you sure that this happened? Assessing the factuality degree of events in text.” Computational Linguistics 38 (2): 261–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe. 2005. “The lazy Frenchman’s approach to the subjunctive: Speculations on reference to worlds and semantics defaults in the analysis of mood.” In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003: Selected Papers from “Going Romance” 2003, ed. by Twan Geerts, Ivo van Ginneken and Haike Jacobs, 269–309. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Be articulate: A pragmatic theory of presupposition projection.” Theoretical Linguistics 34 (3): 157–212.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Local contexts.” Semantics and Pragmatics 2: 1–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Presuppositions and local contexts.” Mind 119 (474): 377–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011a. “Presupposition projection: Two theories of local contexts, Part I.” Language and Linguistics Compass 5 (12): 848–857. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011b. “Presupposition projection: Two theories of local contexts, Part II.” Language and Linguistics Compass 5 (12): 858–879. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schulz, Katrin. 2011. “If you’d wiggled a, then b would’ve changed.” Synthese 179 (2): 239–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schulz, Katrin and Robert Van Rooij. 2006. “Pragmatic meaning and non-monotonic reasoning: The case of exhaustive interpretation.” Linguistics and Philosophy 29 (2): 205–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schulz, Petra. 2003. Factivity: Its Nature and Acquisition. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid. 1954. “Presupposing.” The Philosophical Review 63 (2): 197–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, Michelle and Wolfram Hinzen. 2011. “Moving towards the edge.” Linguistic Analysis 37 (3–4): 405–458.Google Scholar
Simons, Mandy. 2001. “On the conversational basis of some presuppositions.” Semantics and Linguistic Theory 11: 431–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Observations on embedding verbs, evidentiality, and presupposition.” Lingua 117 (6): 1034–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simons, Mandy, David Beaver, Craige Roberts and Judith Tonhauser. 2017. “The best question: Explaining the projection behavior of factives.” Discourse Processes 54 (3): 187–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simons, Mandy, Judith Tonhauser, David Beaver and Craige Roberts. 2010. “What projects and why.” Semantics and Linguistic Theory 20:309–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spector, Benjamin and Paul Egré. 2015. “A uniform semantics for embedded interrogatives: An answer, not necessarily the answer.” Synthese 192 (6): 1729–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spenader, Jennifer. 2003. “Factive presuppositions, accommodation and information structure.” Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12 (3): 351–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 1973. “Presuppositions.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (4): 447–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1974. “Pragmatic presuppositions.” In Semantics and Philosophy, ed. by Milton K. Munitz and Peter K. Unger. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Stanovsky, Gabriel, Judith Eckle-Kohler, Yevgeniy Puzikov, Ido Dagan and Iryna Gurevych. 2017. “Integrating deep linguistic features in factuality prediction over unified datasets.” In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), 352–357. Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter F. 1950. “On referring.” Mind 59 (235): 320–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, Shoichi. 2010. “The hidden side of clausal complements.” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28 (2): 343–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith. 2016. “Prosodic cues to presupposition projection.” Semantics and Linguistic Theory 26:934–960. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith, David I. Beaver and Judith Degen. 2018. “How projective is projective content? gradience in projectivity and at-issueness.” Journal of Semantics 35 (3): 495–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Urmson, James O. 1952. “Parenthetical verbs.” Mind 61 (244): 480–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van der Sandt, Rob A. 1992. “Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution.” Journal of Semantics 9 (4): 333–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varlokosta, Spyridoula. 1994. “Issues in Modern Greek sentential complementation.” Ms., University of Maryland, College Park.
White, Aaron Steven. 2014. “Factive-implicatives and modalized complements.” In Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, ed. by Jyoti Iyer and Leland Kusmer, 267–78. University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
White, Aaron Steven and Kyle Rawlins. 2018. “The role of veridicality and factivity in clause selection.” In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, to appear. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
White, Aaron Steven, Drew Reisinger, Keisuke Sakaguchi, Tim Vieira, Sheng Zhang, Rachel Rudinger, Kyle Rawlins and Benjamin Van Durme. 2016. “Universal decompositional semantics on universal dependencies.” In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1713–1723. Austin, TX: Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Aaron Steven, Rachel Rudinger, Kyle Rawlins and Benjamin Van Durme. 2018. “Lexicosyntactic inference in neural models.” In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 4717–4724. Brussels, Belgium: Association for Computational Linguistics. [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 1975. Presuppositions and Non-Truth-Conditional Semantics. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre and Dan Sperber. 1979. “Ordered entailments: An alternative to presuppositional theories.” Syntax and Semantics 11: 299–323.Google Scholar
Zeevat, Henk. 1992. “Presupposition and accommodation in update semantics.” Journal of Semantics 9 (4): 379–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwarts, Frans. 1995. “Nonveridical contexts.” Linguistic Analysis 25 (3): 286.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Liefke, Kristina
2023. Meaning-Driven Selectional Restrictions in Remember Versus Imagine Whether. In Logic and Algorithms in Computational Linguistics 2021 (LACompLing2021) [Studies in Computational Intelligence, 1081], ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Liefke, Kristina & Markus Werning
2023. Factivity Variation in Episodic Memory Reports. In New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13856], ► pp. 110 ff. DOI logo
Stengel-Eskin, Elias, Kenton Murray, Sheng Zhang, Aaron Steven White & Benjamin Van Durme
2021. Joint Universal Syntactic and Semantic Parsing. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 9 ► pp. 756 ff. DOI logo
Jeong, Sunwoo
2020. The Effect of Prosody on Veridicality Inferences in Korean. In New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12331], ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.