Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: 27th Annual Installment
Edited by Mieke Vandenbroucke, Jana Declercq, Frank Brisard and Sigurd D’hondt
[Handbook of Pragmatics 27] 2024
► pp. 129154
References (82)
References
Aarsæther, Finn. 2010. “The use of multiethnic youth language in Oslo.” In Multilingual Urban Scandinavia. New Linguistic Practices, ed. by Pia Quist and Bente Ailin Svendsen, 111–126. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2003. “The social life of cultural value.” Language & Communication 23 (3–4): 231–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “Voice, footing, enregisterment.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15 (1): 38–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007a. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2007b. “Recombinant selves in mass mediated spacetime.” Language & Communication 27: 320–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ahtosalo, Milja. 2012. Minän monet muodot: Yksikön 1. persoonan pronominin variaatio neljän suomi toisena kielenä -opettajan puheessa. [Many forms of minä: The variation of the first-person singular pronoun in the speech of four Finnish as a second language teachers.] Master’s thesis, University of Helsinki.
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard. 2004. A World of Others’ Words. Cross-cultural Perspectives on Intertextuality. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Richard, and Charles Briggs. 1990. “Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life.” Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 59–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Voices of Modernity. Language Ideologies and the Politics of Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan, and Andy Gibson. 2011. “Staging language: An introduction to the sociolinguistics of performance.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 15 (5): 555–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2001. “Context is/as critique.” Critique of Anthropology 21 (1): 13–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Discourse. A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007a. “Sociolinguistic scales.” Intercultural Pragmatics 4 (1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007b. “Sociolinguistics and discourse analysis: Orders of indexicality and polycentricity.” Journal of Multicultural Discourses 2: 115–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Bernstein and poetics revisited: Voice, globalization and education.” Discourse & Society 19: 425–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Chronotopes, scales, and complexity in the study of language in society.” Annual Review of Anthropology 44: 105–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Are chronotopes helpful? Why do we need another word for context?Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies 243: 1–9.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, and Dong Jie. 2010. Ethnographic Fieldwork: A Beginner’s Guide. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Charles, and Richard Bauman. 1992. “Genre, intertextuality, and social power.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 2 (2): 131–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calder, Jeremy. 2019. “From Sissy to sickening: The indexical landscape of /s/ in SoMa, San Francisco.” Linguistic Anthropology 29 (3): 332–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carr, Summerson E., and Michael Lempert. 2016. Scale: Discourse and Dimensions of Social Life. Oakland: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2007. Style. Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Fina, Anna, and Sabina Perrino. 2020. “Introduction: Chronotopes and chronotopic relations.” Language & Communication 70: 67–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 1989. Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Variation and the indexical field.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 12 (4): 53–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation.” Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 87–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gadet, Françoise. 2022. “Youth vernaculars in Paris and surroundings.” In Urban Contact Dialects and Language Change, ed. by Paul Kerswill and Heike Wiese, 264–281. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gal, Susan, and Judith Irvine. 2019. Signs of Difference. Language and Ideology in Social Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gross, Johan, and Sally Boyd. 2022. “Sweden: Suburban Swedish.” In Urban Contact Dialects and Language Change, ed. by Paul Kerswill and Heike Wiese, 246–263. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. “Contextualization revisited.” In The Contextualization of Language, ed. by Peter Auer and Aldo di Luzio, 39–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halmari, Helena, and Tuija Virtanen. 2005. “Towards understanding modern persuasion.” In Persuasion Across Genres, ed. by Helena Halmari and Tuija Virtanen, 229–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halonen, Mia, Sami Nyström, Heikki Paunonen, and Johanna Vaattovaara. 2020. Stadin syntinen s. [The sinful s of Helsinki City.] Helsinki: Art House.Google Scholar
Hanks, William. 1992. “The indexical ground of deictic reference.” In Rethinking Context. Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 43–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hornikx, Jos, Frank van Meurs, and Robert-Jan Hof. 2013. “The effectiveness of foreign-language display in advertising for congruent versus incongruent products.” Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 25 (3), 152–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith, and Susan Gal. 2000. “Language ideology and linguistic differentiation.” In Regimes of Language, ed. by Paul Kroskrity, 35–83. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra. 2009. “Introduction: The sociolinguistics of stance.” In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. by Alexandra Jaffe, 1–28. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “Indexicality, stance and fields in sociolinguistics.” In Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates, ed. by Nicolas Coupland, 86–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2016. “Enregisterment: How linguistic items become linked with ways of speaking.” Language and Linguistics Compass 10 (11): 632–643. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara, Jennifer Andrus, and Andrew E. Danielson. 2006. “Mobility, indexicality, and the enregisterment of ‘Pittsburghese’.” Journal of English Linguistics (34) 2: 77–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kettunen, Lauri. 1940. Suomen murteet III A. Murrekartasto. [Finnish dialects III A. Dialect maps.] Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society. [URL]
Kiesling, Scott F. 2009. “Style as Stance.” In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. by Alexandra Jaffe, 171–194. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knudsen, Jan Sverre. 2010. “‘Playing with words as if it was a rap game’: Hip-hop street language in Oslo.” In Multilingual Urban Scandinavia. New Linguistic Practices, ed. by Pia Quist and Bente Ailin Svendsen, 156–169. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, Paul. 2013. Agent, Person, Subject, Self. A Theory of Ontology, Interaction, and Infrastructure. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kroskrity, Paul V. (ed.). 2000. Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lappalainen, Hanna. 2004. Variaatio ja sen funktiot. Erään sosiaalisen verkoston jäsenten kielellisen vuorovaikutuksen tarkastelua. [Variation and its functions. Examining the linguistic interactions of members of a social network.] Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Lee, Benjamin. 1997a. Talking Heads. Language, Metalanguage, and the Semiotics of Subjectivity. London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
. 1997b. “Metalanguages and subjectivities.” In Reflexive Language. Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, ed. by John Lucy, 365–392. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lehtonen, Heini. 2011. “Developing Multiethnic Youth Language in Helsinki.” In Ethnic Styles of Speaking in European Metropolitan Areas, ed. by Friederike Kern and Margaret Selting, 291–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Tyylitellen. Nuorten kielelliset resurssit ja kielen sosiaalinen indeksisyys monietnisessä Helsingissä. [Stylizing. The linguistic resources of adolescents and the social indexicality of language in multiethnic Helsinki.]” MA thesis, University of Helsinki. [URL]
. 2016 a. “What’s up Helsinki? New linguistic diversity among adolescents.” In Linguistic Genocide or Superdiversity. New and Old Language Diversities, ed. by Reetta Toivanen and Janne Saarikivi, 65–90. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Madsen, Lian Malai, Martha Sif Kaerrebaek, Janus Spindler Møller (eds.). 2015. Everyday Languaging: Collaborative Research on the Language Use of Children and Youth. Trends in Applied Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mertz, Elisabeth. 1985. “Beyond symbolic anthropology: Introducing semiotic mediation.” In Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives, ed. by Elisabeth Mertz and Richard J. Parmentier, 1–19. Orlando: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakassis, Constantine V. 2018. “Indexicality’s Ambivalent Ground.” Signs and Society 6 (1): 281–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy A., and Dennis Richard Preston. 2000. Folk Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nørreby, Thomas. R. 2015. “Ethnic identifications in late modern Copenhagen.” In Everyday Languaging. Collaborative Research on the Language Use of Children and Youth, ed. by Lian Malai Madsen, Martha Sif Karrebæk, and Janus Spindler Møller, 199–218. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1992. “Indexing gender.” In Rethinking context. Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 335–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parmentier, Richard. 1994. Signs in Society. Studies in Semiotic Anthropology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Paunonen, Heikki. 1995 (1982). Suomen kieli Helsingissä. Huomioita Helsingin puhekielen taustasta ja nykyvariaatiosta. [Finnish in Helsinki. Observations on the history and current variation of the spoken language in Helsinki.] Helsinki: Helsingin yliopiston suomen kielen laitos.Google Scholar
Quist, Pia. 2008. “Sociolinguistic approaches to multiethnolect: Language variety and stylistic practice.” International Journal of Bilingualism 12 (1–2): 43–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. “Denmark: Danish urban contact dialects.” In Urban Contact Dialects and Language Change, ed. by Paul Kerswill and Heike Wiese, 186–205. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rampton, Ben. 2006. Language in Late Modernity. Interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, Elena. 2007. “Mind style twenty-five years on.” Style 41 (2): 135–173.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. “Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description.” In Meaning in Anthropology, ed. by Keith Basso and Ellen Selby, 11–56. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
. 1979. “Language structure and linguistic ideology.” In The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
. 1985. “Language and the culture of gender.” In Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives, ed. by Elisabeth Mertz and Richard J. Parmentier, 219–259. Orlando: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. “The indeterminacy of contextualization: When is enough enough?” In The Contextualization of Language, ed. by Peter Auer and Luzio di Aldo, 55–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1993. “Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function.” In Reflexive l Language. Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, ed. by John Lucy, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. “Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life.” Language & Communication 23: 193–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “Axes of evals: Token versus type interdiscursivity.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15 (1): 6–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2023. Language in Culture. Lectures on the Social Semiotics of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Snell, Julia. 2010. “From sociolinguistic variation to socially strategic stylization.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 14 (5): 630–656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svendsen, Bente Ailin. 2022. “Norway: Contemporary urban speech styles.” In Urban Contact Dialects and Language Change, ed. by Paul Kerswill and Heike Wiese, 206–222. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanner, Johanna. 2012. “Rakenne, tilanne ja kohteliaisuus. Pyynnöt S2-oppikirjoissa ja autenttisissa keskusteluissa”. [Structure, situation and politeness. Requests in Finnish as a second language textbooks and authentic conversations.] PhD Dissertation, University of Helsinki. [URL]
Urban, Greg. 2001. Metaculture. How Culture Moves through the World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Visakko, Tomi. 2015. Self-promotion as Semiotic Behaviour. The Mediation of Personhood in Light of Finnish Online Dating Advertisements. Phd Dissertation, University of Helsinki. [URL]
Woolard, Kathryn A. 2008. “Why dat now?: Linguistic-anthropological contributions to the explanation of sociolinguistic icons and change.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 12 (4): 432–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar