Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 563–571

Folk pragmatics

Article outline
  • 1.Folk linguistics
  • 2.Folk pragmatics
  • 3.Directions for future research
  • References
Published online: 3 October 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.fol1
References (19)
References
Bassili, J. N. & R. D. Brown. 2005. Implicit and explicit attitudes: Research, challenges, theory. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson & M. P. Zanna (eds.) The handbook of attitudes: 543–574. Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Edwards, J. R. 1982. Language attitudes and their implications among English speakers. In E. B. Ryan & H. Giles (eds.) Attitudes towards language variation: 20–33. Arnold. Google Scholar
Hoenigswald, H. 1966. A proposal for the study of folk-linguistics. In W. Bright (ed.) Sociolinguistics: 16–26. Mouton. Google Scholar
Hymes, D. 1972. Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (eds.) Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication: 35–71. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Imai, T. 2000. Folk linguistics and conversational argument. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV). East Lansing, MI, October.
Kristiansen, T. 2006. Social meanings and subjective processes: A presentation of theories and methods from the Næstved studies. Paper presented at Approaches to the Study of Folk Linguistics, Sociolinguistic Awareness and Language Attitudes. Centre for Research on Bilingualism, Stockholm University.
Mey, J. 1993. Pragmatics. Blackwell. Google Scholar
Milroy, L. & P. Mcclenaghan. 1977. Stereotyped reactions to four educated accents in Ulster. Belfast Working Papers in Language and Linguistics 2: 1–11. Google Scholar
Niedzielski, N. 1999. The effects of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1): 62–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niedzielski, N. & D. R. Preston. 2000. Folk linguistics. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pasquale, M. & D. R. Preston. 2006. The folk linguistics of language teaching and learning. Paper presented at the 2006 Second Language Research Forum (SLRF). University of Washington, Seattle. Google Scholar
Plichta, B. 2004. Interdisciplinary perspectives on the Northern Cities Chain Shift. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Michigan State University. Google Scholar
Preston, D. R. 1993. The uses of folk linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 3(2): 181–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. Content-oriented discourse analysis and folk linguistics. Language Sciences 16(2): 285–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996. Whaddayaknow?: The modes of folk linguistic awareness. Language Awareness 5(1): 40–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. 1985. Everyday argument: the organization of diversity in talk. In T. A. Van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis 3: 35–46. Academic Press. Google Scholar
Sibata, T. 1971. Kotoba no kihan ishiki. Gengo Seikatsu 236: 14–21. [English quotations and page references are taken from this article translated as ‘Consciousness of language norms’ in T. Kunihiro, F. Inoue & D. Long (eds.) (1999) Takesi Sibata: Sociolinguistics in Japanese contexts: 371–377. Mouton de Gruyter.]Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. 1981. The limits of awareness. Sociolinguistic Working Paper No. 84. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. Google Scholar
1993. Metapagmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In J. Lucy (ed.) Reflexive language: 3–58. Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar