Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 592–601

Frame semantics

Article outline
  • References
Published online: 3 October 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.fra1
References (35)
References
Atkins, B. T. S. 1994. Analyzing the verbs of seeing: A frame semantics approach to corpus lexicography. In C. Johnson et al.. (eds.): 42–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. The role of the example in a frame semantics dictionary. In M. Shibatani & S. Thompson (eds.): 25–42.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. 1968. The case for case. In E. Bach & R. Harms (eds.) Universals in Linguistic Theory: 1–88. Holt Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
1975. An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. In C. Cogen et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 123–131. Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
1976a. Frame semantics and the nature of language. In S. R. Harnad, H. D. Steklis, & J. Lancaster (eds.) Origins and Evolution of Language and Speech, Vol. 280: 20–32. Annals of the NY Academy of Sciences. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1976b. The need for frame semantics within linguistics. Statistical Methods in Linguistics 12: 5–29.Google Scholar
1977. Scenes-and-frames semantics. In A. Zampolli (ed.) Linguistics Structures Processing: 55–81. North Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
1977b. Topics in lexical semantics. In R. Cole (ed.) Current Issues in Linguistic Theory: 76–138. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
1978. On the organization of semantic information in the lexicon. In D. Frakas et al. (eds.) Papers from the Parasession on the Lexicon: 148–173. Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1982. Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm: 111–137. The Linguistic Society of Korea. Hanshin.Google Scholar
1985a. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6(2): 222–254.Google Scholar
1985b. Syntactic intrusions and the notion of grammatical construction. In M. Niepokuj et al. (ed.) Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 73–86. Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
1986. U-semantics, Second Round. Quaderni di Semantica 7(1): 49–58.Google Scholar
1988. The mechanisms of construction grammar. In S. Axmaker, A. Jaisser & H. Singmaster (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 35–55. Berkeley Linguistics Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. The hard road from verbs to nouns. In M. Y. Chen, O. J. L. Tzeng, & W. S. Y. Wang (eds.) In Honor of William S. Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary Studies on Language and Language Change: 105–129. Pyramid Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. & B. T. Atkins. 1992. Towards a Frame-based organization of the lexicon: the semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In A. Lehrer & E. Kittay (eds.) Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantics and Lexical Organization: 75–102. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. 1994. Starting where the dictionaries stop: The challenge of corpus lexicography. In B. T. S. Atkins & A. Zampolli (eds.) Computational Approaches to the Lexicon: 349–393. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fujii, S. Y. 1993. The Use and Learning of Clause-linkage: Case Studies in Japanese and English Conditionals. Unpublished PhD. dissertation. University of California.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Johnson, C. et al.. (eds.) 1994. Proceedings of the Twentieth Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1986. Frame semantic control of the coordinate structure constraint. In M. Farley et al. (eds.) Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory: 152–167. Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. 1984. Formulaicity, frame semantics, and pragmatics in German binomial expressions. Language 60: 4: 753–796. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lawler, J. 1988. Time is money: The anatomy of a metaphor. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
1989. Lexical semantics in the commercial transaction frame: value, worth, cost, and price. Studies in Language 13(2): 381–404. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. 1989. Grammar and Semantics of Adnominal Clauses in Japanese. PhD. Diss. University of California.Google Scholar
Minsky, M. 1975. A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (ed.) The Psychology of Computer Vision: 211–277. McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
O’connor, M. C. 1994. The marking of possession in Northern Pomo: privative opposition and pragmatic reference. In C. Johnson et al. (eds.): 387–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996. The situated interpretation of posessor raising. In M. Shibatani & S. Thompson (eds.) Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning: 125–156. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Okamoto, S. 1985. Ellipsis in Japanese Discourse. PhD. Diss. University of California.Google Scholar
Petruck, M. R. L. 1986. Body Part Terminology in Hebrew: A Study in Lexical Semantics. PhD. Diss. University of California.Google Scholar
1995. Frame semantics and the lexicon: nouns and verbs in the body frame. In M. Shibatani & S. Thompson (eds.): 279 – 296.Google Scholar
forthcoming. What’s a frame? The development of a concept in lexical semantics.Google Scholar
Schank, R. C. & R. P. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Shibatani, M. & S. Thompson (eds.) 1995. Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics. John Benjamins. Google Scholar
Tannen, D. 1979. What’s in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In R. Freedle (ed.) New Directions in Discourse Processing: 137–181. Ablex. Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Dancygier, Barbara
2023. Multimodal media: Framing climate change. Discourse Studies 25:2 ► pp. 220 ff. DOI logo
Sullivan, Karen
2023. Three levels of framing. WIREs Cognitive Science 14:5 DOI logo
Ungerer, Tobias & Stefan Hartmann
2023. Constructionist Approaches, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.