Frame semantics
Article outline
References (35)
References
Atkins, B. T. S. 1994. Analyzing the verbs of seeing: A frame semantics approach to corpus lexicography. In C. Johnson et al.. (eds.): 42–56. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Atkins, B. T. S. 1995. The role of the example in a frame semantics dictionary. In M. Shibatani & S. Thompson (eds.): 25–42.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J. 1968. The case for case. In E. Bach & R. Harms (eds.) Universals in Linguistic Theory: 1–88. Holt Rinehart and Winston.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J. 1975. An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. In C. Cogen et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 123–131. Berkeley Linguistics Society.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J. 1976a. Frame semantics and the nature of language. In S. R. Harnad, H. D. Steklis, & J. Lancaster (eds.) Origins and Evolution of Language and Speech, Vol. 280: 20–32. Annals of the NY Academy of Sciences. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J. 1976b. The need for frame semantics within linguistics. Statistical Methods in Linguistics 12: 5–29.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J. 1977. Scenes-and-frames semantics. In A. Zampolli (ed.) Linguistics Structures Processing: 55–81. North Holland Publishing Company.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J. 1977b. Topics in lexical semantics. In R. Cole (ed.) Current Issues in Linguistic Theory: 76–138. Indiana University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J. 1978. On the organization of semantic information in the lexicon. In D. Frakas et al. (eds.) Papers from the Parasession on the Lexicon: 148–173. Chicago Linguistic Society.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J. 1982. Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm: 111–137. The Linguistic Society of Korea. Hanshin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J. 1985a. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6(2): 222–254.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J. 1985b. Syntactic intrusions and the notion of grammatical construction. In M. Niepokuj et al. (ed.) Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 73–86. Berkeley Linguistics Society.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J. 1986. U-semantics, Second Round. Quaderni di Semantica 7(1): 49–58.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J. 1988. The mechanisms of construction grammar. In S. Axmaker, A. Jaisser & H. Singmaster (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 35–55. Berkeley Linguistics Society. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J. 1994. The hard road from verbs to nouns. In M. Y. Chen, O. J. L. Tzeng, & W. S. Y. Wang (eds.) In Honor of William S. Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary Studies on Language and Language Change: 105–129. Pyramid Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. & B. T. Atkins. 1992. Towards a Frame-based organization of the lexicon: the semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In A. Lehrer & E. Kittay (eds.) Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantics and Lexical Organization: 75–102. Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. & B. T. Atkins. 1994. Starting where the dictionaries stop: The challenge of corpus lexicography. In B. T. S. Atkins & A. Zampolli (eds.) Computational Approaches to the Lexicon: 349–393. Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fujii, S. Y. 1993. The Use and Learning of Clause-linkage: Case Studies in Japanese and English Conditionals. Unpublished PhD. dissertation. University of California.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, C. et al.. (eds.) 1994. Proceedings of the Twentieth Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley Linguistics Society.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G. 1986. Frame semantic control of the coordinate structure constraint. In M. Farley et al. (eds.) Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory: 152–167. Chicago Linguistic Society.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lambrecht, K. 1984. Formulaicity, frame semantics, and pragmatics in German binomial expressions. Language 60: 4: 753–796. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lawler, J. 1988. Time is money: The anatomy of a metaphor. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matsumoto, Y. 1989. Grammar and Semantics of Adnominal Clauses in Japanese. PhD. Diss. University of California.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Minsky, M. 1975. A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (ed.) The Psychology of Computer Vision: 211–277. McGraw-Hill. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O’connor, M. C. 1994. The marking of possession in Northern Pomo: privative opposition and pragmatic reference. In C. Johnson et al. (eds.): 387–401. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O’connor, M. C. 1996. The situated interpretation of posessor raising. In M. Shibatani & S. Thompson (eds.) Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning: 125–156. Clarendon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Okamoto, S. 1985. Ellipsis in Japanese Discourse. PhD. Diss. University of California.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Petruck, M. R. L. 1986. Body Part Terminology in Hebrew: A Study in Lexical Semantics. PhD. Diss. University of California.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Petruck, M. R. L. 1995. Frame semantics and the lexicon: nouns and verbs in the body frame. In M. Shibatani & S. Thompson (eds.): 279 – 296.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Petruck, M. R. L. forthcoming. What’s a frame? The development of a concept in lexical semantics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schank, R. C. & R. P. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Lawrence Erlbaum. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shibatani, M. & S. Thompson (eds.) 1995. Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics. John Benjamins. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tannen, D. 1979. What’s in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In R. Freedle (ed.) New Directions in Discourse Processing: 137–181. Ablex. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Dancygier, Barbara
2023.
Multimodal media: Framing climate change.
Discourse Studies 25:2
► pp. 220 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Sullivan, Karen
2023.
Three levels of framing.
WIREs Cognitive Science 14:5
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Ungerer, Tobias & Stefan Hartmann
2023.
Constructionist Approaches,
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.