Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 849–854

Lexical functional grammar

Article outline
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 3 October 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.lex2
References (31)
References
Ackerman, F. 1987. Miscreant morphemes. Ph.D. Diss., University of California. Google Scholar
Ackerman, F. & P. Lesourd. 1994. Toward a lexical representation of phrasal predicates. In P. Sellset. al. (eds.) Complex predicates. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Alsina, A. 1992. On the argument structure of causatives. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 517–555. Google Scholar
1993. Predicate composition. Ph.D. Diss., Stanford University. Google Scholar
Alsina, A. & S. Mchombo. 1991. The syntax of applicatives in Chichewa. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 493–506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andrews, A. 1990. Unification and morphological blocking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 507–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andrews, A. & C. Manning. 1993. Information spreading and levels in LFG. CSLI Report93–176, Stanford. Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. 1978. A realistic transformational grammar. In M. Halle et al.(eds.) Linguistic theory and psychological reality. MIT Press. Google Scholar
1982. The passive in lexical theory. In J. Bresnan (ed.). Google Scholar
1993. Interaction between grammar and discourse. In W. Foley (ed.) The role of linguistic theory in language description. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. Locative inversion and the architecture of universal grammar. Language 70: 72–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1982. The mental representation of grammatical relations. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. & J. Kanerva. 1989. Locative inversion in Chichewa. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 1–50. Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. & S. Mchombo. 1987. Topic, pronoun and agreement in Chichewa. Language 63: 741–782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, J. & L. Moshi. 1990. Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 147–185. Google Scholar
Butt, M. 1994. Complex predicates in Urdu. In A. Alsina & P. Sells (eds.) Complex predicates. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In R. Jacobs & P. Rosenbaum (eds.) Readings in English transformational grammar. Blaisdall Publishers. Google Scholar
Dalrymple, M. 1993. The syntax of anaphoric binding. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford. Google Scholar
Iida, M. et al. (eds.) 1987. Working papers in grammatical theory and discourse structure. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1987. Consciousness and the computational mind. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Kac, M. 1978. Corepresentation of grammatical structure. University of Minnesota Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, R. & J. Bresnan. 1982. Lexical functional grammar. In J. Bresnan (ed.). Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. & A. Zaenen. 1989. Long distance dependencies, constituent structure and functional uncertainty. In M. Baltin (ed.) Alternative conceptions of phrase structure. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Kroeger, P. 1993. Phrase structure and grammatical relations in Tagalog. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Lapointe, S. 1980. A theory of grammatical agreement. Ph.D. Diss., University of Massachusetts. Google Scholar
Mohanan, T. 1990. Arguments in Hindi. Ph.D. Diss., Stanford University. Google Scholar
Pinker, S. 1984. Language learnability and language development. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Sadock, J. 1991. Autolexical syntax. Chicago University Press. Google Scholar
Shieber, S. 1986. An introduction to unification-based approaches to grammar. CSLI Lecture Notes 4, Stanford. Google Scholar
Simpson, J. 1991. Walpiri morpho-syntax. Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zaenen, A. 1994. Unaccusativity in Dutch. In J. Pustejovsky (ed.) Semantics and the lexicon. Kluwer. Google Scholar