Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 855–864

Lexical semantics

Published online: 3 October 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.lex3
References (62)
References
Basilius, H. 1952. Neo-Humboldtian ethnolinguistics. Word 8: 95–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Benthem, J. & A. Ter Meulen (eds.) 1985. Generalized Quantifiers in Natural Language. Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berlin, B. & P. Kay. 1969. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. University of California Press. Google Scholar
Black, M. 1937. Vagueness: an exercise in logical analysis. Philosophy of Science 4: 427–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D. 1961. Generality, Gradience, and the All-or-None. Mouton.Google Scholar
1965. The atomization of meaning. Language 41: 555–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1972. Degree Words. Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burgess, D., W. Kempton & R. E. Maclaury. 1993. Tarahumara color modifiers: category structure presaging evolutionary change. American Ethnologist 10: 133–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casad, E. & R. W. Langacker. 1985. “inside” and “outside” in Cora grammar. International Journal of American Linguistics 51: 247–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax.Google Scholar
Coleman, M. I. T. L. 1975. The case of the vanishing presupposition. Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 79–89. Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Dahlgren, K. 1985. Social terms and social reality. Folia Linguistica Historica 6: 107–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duczmal, S. 1979. A contrastive semantic analysis of colour adjectives in Polish and English. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics 9: 181–191.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. 1968a. Verbs of judging: an exercise in semantic description. In C. J. Fillmore & D. T. Langendoen (eds.), Studies in Linguisic Semantics: 272–289. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
1968b. The case for case. In E. Bach & R. T. Harmes (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory: 1–90. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
1975. An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 123–131.Google Scholar
1978. Topics in lexical semantics. In R. W. Cole (ed.) Current Issues in Linguistic Theory: 76–138. Indiana.Google Scholar
Freidrich, P. 1969. On the meaning of the Tarascan suffixes of space. International Journal of American Linguistics 35, Memoir 23: 1–43.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D. 1988. Cognitive Grammar and the history of lexical semantics. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics: 647–677. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. Lexical semantics. In R. E. Asher & J. M. Y. Simpson, The Encyclopedia of Languages and Linguistics: 2161–2164. Pergamon.Google Scholar
Goodenough, W. H. 1956. Componential analysis and the study of meaning. Language 32: 195–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1964. Explorations in Cultural Anthropology. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Heider, E. R. 1972. Probabilities, sampling, and ethnographic method: the case of Dani colour names. Man 7: 448–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hersh, H. M. & A. Carmazza. 1976. Fuzzy set approach to modifiers and vagueness in natural language. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General 105: 254–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, J. H. & R. E. Maclaury. 1995. The Terror of Montezuma: Aztec history, vantage theory, and the category of “person.” In J. R. Taylor & R. E. Maclaury (eds.) Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World: 277–329. Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ipsen, G. 1924. Der alte Orient und die Indogermanen. In J. Friedrich, J. Hofmann & W. Horn (eds.) Stand und Aufgaben der Sprachwissenschaft. Festschrift für Streitberg: 200–237. C. Winter.Google Scholar
1932. Der neue Sprachbegriff. Zeitschrift für Deutschkunde 46: 1–18.Google Scholar
Janda, L. A. 1988. The mapping of elements of cognitive space onto grammatical relations: an example from Russian verbal prefixation. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.) Topics in Cognitive Linguistics: 327–343. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. & J. Fodor. 1963. The structure of a semantic theory. Language 39: 170–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kay, P. 1978. Tahitian words for race and class. In Rank and Status in Polynésia and Mélanésia: Essays in Honor of Professor Douglas Oliver: 81–93. Musée de l’Homme. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kempton, W. 1978. Category grading and taxonomic relations: a mug is a sort of a cup. American Ethnologist 5: 44–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981. The Folk Classification of Ceramics: A Study of Cognitive Prototypes. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1978. Denotational structure. Papers from the 14th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: Parasession on the Lexicon: 220–260.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1973. Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 458–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago. Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. 1990. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1: 5–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, A. 1974. Semantic Fields and Lexical Structure. North-Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lehrer, A. & E. F. Kittay. 1993. Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization. L. Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Loundsbury, F. G. 1964. A formal account of Crow- and Omaha-type kinship terminologies. In W. Goodenough (ed.): 351–393.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. 1995. Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maclaury, R. E. 1991. Prototypes revisited. Annual Review of Anthropology 20: 55–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993. Prototype Bibliography, 1971–1991. MS available from author.Google Scholar
1997. Color and Cognition in Mesoamerica: Constructing Categories as Vantages. Texas.Google Scholar
Mccarthy, M. J. 1991. Lexis and lexicology. In K. Malmkjær & J. M. Anderson, The Linguistics Encyclopedia: 298–305. Routledge.Google Scholar
Mckaughan, H. & R. Austerlitz. 1959. Semantic components of pronoun systems: Maranao and Gyliak. Word 15: 101–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Öhman, S. 1953. Theories of the “linguistic field.” Word 9: 123–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reuning, K. 1941. ‘Joy’ and ‘Freud’: A Comparative Study of the Linguistic Field of Pleasurable Emotions in English and German. Swathmore College Book Store.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. H. 1973. On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T. E. Moore (ed.) Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language: 111–144. Academic Presscademic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1975. Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology 7: 532–547. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978. Principles of categorization. In E. H. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and Categorization, 28–48. L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. H. & C. B. Mervis. 1975. Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7: 573–605. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, J. R. 1974. A fake NP squish. In C.-J. Bailey & R. Shuy (eds.) New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English: 96–140. Georgetown.Google Scholar
Sanjek, R. 1971. Brazilian racial terms: some aspects of meaning and learning. American Anthropologist 77: 1126–1143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sapir, E. 1944. Grading: a study in semantics. Philosophy of Science 11: 93–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. R. 1989. Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Clarendon.Google Scholar
Trier, J. 1931. Der deutsche Wortschatz im Sinnbezirk des Verstandes. C. Winter.Google Scholar
1934. Das sprachliche Feld. Neue Jahrbücher für Wissenschaft und Jugendbildung 10: 428–449.Google Scholar
Tylor, S. A. (ed.) 1969. Cognitive Anthropology. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Ullmann, S. 1957 [1951]. The Principles of Semantics: A Linguistic Approach to Meaning. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. 1996. Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford. Google Scholar
Zedah, L. A. 1972. A fuzzy-set-theoretic interpretation of linguistic hedges. Journal of Cybernetics 2: 4–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar