Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 855–864

Lexical semantics

Published online: 3 October 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.lex3
References
Basilius, H.
1952 Neo-Humboldtian ethnolinguistics. Word 8: 95–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Benthem, J. & A. Ter Meulen
(eds.) 1985 Generalized Quantifiers in Natural Language. Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berlin, B. & P. Kay
1969 Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. University of California Press. Google Scholar
Black, M.
1937 Vagueness: an exercise in logical analysis. Philosophy of Science 4: 427–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D.
1961 Generality, Gradience, and the All-or-None. Mouton.Google Scholar
1965 The atomization of meaning. Language 41: 555–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1972 Degree Words. Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burgess, D., W. Kempton & R. E. Maclaury
1993 Tarahumara color modifiers: category structure presaging evolutionary change. American Ethnologist 10: 133–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casad, E. & R. W. Langacker
1985 “inside” and “outside” in Cora grammar. International Journal of American Linguistics 51: 247–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1957 Syntactic Structures. Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax.Google Scholar
Coleman, M. I. T. L.
1975 The case of the vanishing presupposition. Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 79–89. Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Dahlgren, K.
1985 Social terms and social reality. Folia Linguistica Historica 6: 107–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duczmal, S.
1979 A contrastive semantic analysis of colour adjectives in Polish and English. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics 9: 181–191.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J.
1968a Verbs of judging: an exercise in semantic description. In C. J. Fillmore & D. T. Langendoen (eds.), Studies in Linguisic Semantics: 272–289. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
1968b The case for case. In E. Bach & R. T. Harmes (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory: 1–90. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
1975 An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 123–131.Google Scholar
1978 Topics in lexical semantics. In R. W. Cole (ed.) Current Issues in Linguistic Theory: 76–138. Indiana.Google Scholar
Freidrich, P.
1969 On the meaning of the Tarascan suffixes of space. International Journal of American Linguistics 35, Memoir 23: 1–43.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D.
1988 Cognitive Grammar and the history of lexical semantics. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics: 647–677. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 Lexical semantics. In R. E. Asher & J. M. Y. Simpson, The Encyclopedia of Languages and Linguistics: 2161–2164. Pergamon.Google Scholar
Goodenough, W. H.
1956 Componential analysis and the study of meaning. Language 32: 195–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1964 Explorations in Cultural Anthropology. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Heider, E. R.
1972 Probabilities, sampling, and ethnographic method: the case of Dani colour names. Man 7: 448–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hersh, H. M. & A. Carmazza
1976 Fuzzy set approach to modifiers and vagueness in natural language. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General 105: 254–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, J. H. & R. E. Maclaury
1995 The Terror of Montezuma: Aztec history, vantage theory, and the category of “person.” In J. R. Taylor & R. E. Maclaury (eds.) Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World: 277–329. Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ipsen, G.
1924 Der alte Orient und die Indogermanen. In J. Friedrich, J. Hofmann & W. Horn (eds.) Stand und Aufgaben der Sprachwissenschaft. Festschrift für Streitberg: 200–237. C. Winter.Google Scholar
1932 Der neue Sprachbegriff. Zeitschrift für Deutschkunde 46: 1–18.Google Scholar
Janda, L. A.
1988 The mapping of elements of cognitive space onto grammatical relations: an example from Russian verbal prefixation. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.) Topics in Cognitive Linguistics: 327–343. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. & J. Fodor
1963 The structure of a semantic theory. Language 39: 170–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kay, P.
1978 Tahitian words for race and class. In Rank and Status in Polynésia and Mélanésia: Essays in Honor of Professor Douglas Oliver: 81–93. Musée de l’Homme. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kempton, W.
1978 Category grading and taxonomic relations: a mug is a sort of a cup. American Ethnologist 5: 44–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981 The Folk Classification of Ceramics: A Study of Cognitive Prototypes. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W.
1978 Denotational structure. Papers from the 14th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: Parasession on the Lexicon: 220–260.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
1973 Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 458–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson
1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago. Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
1990 Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1: 5–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, A.
1974 Semantic Fields and Lexical Structure. North-Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lehrer, A. & E. F. Kittay
1993 Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization. L. Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Loundsbury, F. G.
1964 A formal account of Crow- and Omaha-type kinship terminologies. In W. Goodenough (ed.): 351–393.Google Scholar
Lyons, J.
1995 Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maclaury, R. E.
1991 Prototypes revisited. Annual Review of Anthropology 20: 55–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 Prototype Bibliography, 1971–1991. MS available from author.Google Scholar
1997 Color and Cognition in Mesoamerica: Constructing Categories as Vantages. Texas.Google Scholar
Mccarthy, M. J.
1991 Lexis and lexicology. In K. Malmkjær & J. M. Anderson, The Linguistics Encyclopedia: 298–305. Routledge.Google Scholar
Mckaughan, H. & R. Austerlitz
1959 Semantic components of pronoun systems: Maranao and Gyliak. Word 15: 101–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Öhman, S.
1953 Theories of the “linguistic field.” Word 9: 123–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reuning, K.
1941 ‘Joy’ and ‘Freud’: A Comparative Study of the Linguistic Field of Pleasurable Emotions in English and German. Swathmore College Book Store.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. H.
1973 On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T. E. Moore (ed.) Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language: 111–144. Academic Presscademic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1975 Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology 7: 532–547. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978 Principles of categorization. In E. H. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and Categorization, 28–48. L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. H. & C. B. Mervis
1975 Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7: 573–605. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, J. R.
1974 A fake NP squish. In C.-J. Bailey & R. Shuy (eds.) New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English: 96–140. Georgetown.Google Scholar
Sanjek, R.
1971 Brazilian racial terms: some aspects of meaning and learning. American Anthropologist 77: 1126–1143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sapir, E.
1944 Grading: a study in semantics. Philosophy of Science 11: 93–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. R.
1989 Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Clarendon.Google Scholar
Trier, J.
1931 Der deutsche Wortschatz im Sinnbezirk des Verstandes. C. Winter.Google Scholar
1934 Das sprachliche Feld. Neue Jahrbücher für Wissenschaft und Jugendbildung 10: 428–449.Google Scholar
Tylor, S. A.
(ed.) 1969 Cognitive Anthropology. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Ullmann, S.
1957 [1951] The Principles of Semantics: A Linguistic Approach to Meaning. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
1996 Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford. Google Scholar
Zedah, L. A.
1972 A fuzzy-set-theoretic interpretation of linguistic hedges. Journal of Cybernetics 2: 4–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar