Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 1427–1452

Truth-conditional pragmatics

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Gricean pragmatics and truth-conditional meaning
  • 3.Neo-Gricean pragmatics and the division of linguistic labour
    • 3.1Horn’s Q and R principles
      • 3.1.1The division of linguistic labour
      • 3.1.2What is communicated
    • 3.2Levinson’s heuristics
      • 3.2.1Grice’s circle and its solution
      • 3.2.2Counter-examples
  • 4.Post-Gricean pragmatics, implicature and explicature
    • 4.1The domain of explicature
    • 4.2The limits of implicatures
    • 4.3The relation between semantics and pragmatics
      • 4.3.1Lexical meaning and pragmatics
      • 4.3.2Procedural meaning
      • 4.3.3Synthesis
  • 5.Truth-conditional pragmatics
  • 6.Conclusion: The semantics-pragmatics interface revisited
  • Acknowledgment
  • References
Published online: 3 October 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.tru3
References (60)
References
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Blochowiak, Joanna. 2010. “Some formal properties of causal and inferential ‘because’ in different embedding contexts.” Generative Grammar@Geneva 6: 191–202.Google Scholar
. 2014a. “A presuppositional account of causal and temporal interpretations of and.” Topoi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014b. A Theoretical Approach to the Quest for Understanding. Semantics and Pragmatics of whys and becauses. PhD thesis, Department of Linguistics, University of Geneva.
. 2017. “Connectives: Order, causality and beyond.” In Formal Models in the Study of Language, ed. by Joanna Blochowiak, Cristina Grisot, Stéphanie Dürrlemann-Tame and Christopher Laenzlinger. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blochowiak, Joanna and Thomas Castelain. 2018. “How logical is natural language conjunction? Am experimental investigation of the French conjunction et .” In Language, Evolution, and Mind: Essays in Honor of Anne Reboul, ed. by Pierre Saint-Germier, 97–125. London: College Publications.Google Scholar
Borg, Emma. 2012. “Semantics without pragmatics?” In The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by. Keith Allan and Kasia M. Jaszczolt, 513–528. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Minimal Semantics. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 2013. Logic in Grammar: Polarity, Free Choice, and Intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, L. Jonathan. 1971. “Some remarks on Grice’s view about the logical particles of natural language.” In Pragmatics of Natural Language, ed. by Yoshua Bar-Hillel, 50–68. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cole, Peter. 1981. “Preface”. In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, xi–xiv. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, Victoria, Manuel Leonetti and Aoife Ahern (eds). 2011. Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives. Bingley: Emerald Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. 1975. The Language of Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2008. LOT 2: The Language of Thought Revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald. 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. “Logic and conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grisot, Cristina. 2015. Temporal Reference: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives. Converging Evidence from English and Romance. PhD thesis, Department of Linguistics, University of Geneva.
Grisot, Cristina and Jacques Moeschler. 2014. “How do empirical methods interact with theoretical pragmatics? The conceptual and procedural contents of the English Simple Past and its translation into French.” In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2014: New Empirical and Theoretical Paradigms, ed. by Jesus Romero-Trillo, 7–33. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hauser, Marc. 1996. The Evolution of Communication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 1984. “Towards a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature.” In Meaning, Form and Use in Context. GURT 84, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, 11–42. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2004. “Implicature.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence Horn and Gregory Ward, 3–28. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Huang, Yan. 2014. Pragmatics, 2nd edition. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri and Stanley Peters. 1979. “Conventional implicatures”. In Syntax and Semantics 11: Presupposition, ed. by Choon-kyu Oh and David A. Dinneen, 1–56. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward.1978. “On surface form and logical form.” In Linguistics in the Seventies: Directions and Prospects, ed. by Braj B. Kachru, 163–203. Special issue of Studies in Linguistic Sciences 8(2).Google Scholar
Korta, Kepa and John Perry. 2011. Critical Pragmatics An Inquiry into Reference and Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montague, Richard. 1970. “Pragmatics and intensional logic”. Synthese 22: 68–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moeschler, Jacques. 2007. “The role of explicature in communication and in intercultural communication”. In Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects, ed. by Istvan Kecskes and Laurence R. Horn, 73–94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Causal, inferential and temporal connectives: Why parce que is the only causal connective in French.” In Marqueurs discursifs et subjectivité, ed. by Sylvie Hancil, 97–114. Rouen: Presses Universitaires de Rouen et du Havre.Google Scholar
. 2013a. “Is a speaker-based pragmatics possible? Or how can a hearer infer a speaker’s commitment?” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 84–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013b. “How ‘logical’ are logical words? Negation and its descriptive vs. metalinguistic uses.” In Nonveridicality and Evaluation. Theoretical, Computational and Corpus Approaches, ed. by Maite Taboada and Radoslava Trnavac, 76–110. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
. 2016a. “Where is procedural meaning? Evidence from discourse connectives and tenses.” Lingua 175-176: 122–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016b. “Avec ou sans? Une approche pragmatique des discours causaux explicités et implicités” [With or without? A pragmatic approach of explicit and implicit causal discourses]. In The Grammar of Causation, ed. by Stéphane Viellard Irina Thomièresand , 36–51. Paris: CeliSo.Google Scholar
. 2017a. “Formal and natural languages: What does logic tell us about natural language?” In The Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Anne Barron A., Gerard Steen and Gu Yueguo, 241–256. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. “Back to negative particulars. A truth-conditional account.” In Pragmatics and its Interfaces, ed. by Stavros Assimakopoulos, 9–31. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Representation and metarepresentation in negation.” In Relevance Theory: Pragmatics and Interpretation, ed. by Robyn Carston, Kate Scott and Billy Clark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Noveck, Ira and Dan Sperber. 2007. “The why and how of experimental pragmatics: The case of ‘scalar implicatures’.” In Pragmatics, ed. by Noel Burton-Roberts, 184–212. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reboul, Anne. 2004. “Conversational Implicatures: Nonce or Generalized?” In Experimental Pragmatics, ed. by Ira Noveck and Dan Sperber, 322–333. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Cognition and Communication in the Evolution of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reboul, Anne and Jacques Moeschler. 1998. La pragmatique aujourd’hui : Une nouvelle science de la communication [Pragmatics Today. A New Science of Communication]. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Recanati, François. 2002. “Unarticulated constituents.” Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 299–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.Google Scholar
. 2010. Truth-Conditional Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sasamoto, Ryoko and Deirdre Wilson (eds). 2016. Little Words: Communication and Procedural Meaning. Special issue of Lingua 175–176.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1983. Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Oxford. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. 1978. “On testing for conversational implicature.” In Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 281–297. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2003. “Relevance and lexical pragmatics.” Italian Journal of Linguistics 15(2): 273–291.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre and Robyn Carston. 2007. “A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts.” In Pragmatics, ed. by Noel Burton-Roberts, 230–259. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre and Dan Sperber. 1993. “Linguistic form and relevance”. Lingua 90(1–2): 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “Relevance theory.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn and Gregory Ward, 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2012. Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zufferey, Sandrine, Jacques Moeschler and Anne Reboul. Forthcoming. Implicatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo