Strict Interfaces and three kinds of Multiple Grammar
Modern linguistic theory introduces the question of how interfaces are to be mechanically represented. It is argued that there are strict innate interfaces where semantics, pragmatics, and syntax must coincide. The Strong Minimalist Thesis (Chomsky 2005) is a prime example. We argue that so-called 3rd Factors, which are part of these interfaces, must be present in core aspects of grammar. It follows language variation cannot and should not, as suggested by Richards (2008) be abstracted out of core grammar as entirely due to 3rd Factor or Externalization processes. Several instances where variation is compatible because it can be represented are introduced.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Otheguy, Ricardo, Ofelia García & Wallis Reid
2019.
A translanguaging view of the linguistic system of bilinguals.
Applied Linguistics Review 10:4
► pp. 625 ff.
Roeper, Tom W.
2016.
Multiple Grammars and the Logic of Learnability in Second Language Acquisition.
Frontiers in Psychology 7
Amaral, Luiz & Tom Roeper
2014.
Why minimal multiple rules provide a unique window into UG and L2.
Second Language Research 30:1
► pp. 97 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.