Cover not available
Part of
Handbook of Translation Studies: Volume 5
Edited by Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer
[Handbook of Translation Studies 5] 2021
► pp. 3–9

Alternative labels for “translation”

| University of Tartu | KU Leuven | Stellenbosch University
Article outline
  • 1.The complex reality of an apparently simple subject
  • 2.Examples of alternative labels
  • 3.Digitization stressing the blurred boundaries
  • 4.Multilingual differences and future perspectives
  • References
  • Further essential reading
Published online: 16 September 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hts.5.alt1
References (21)
References
Gaballo, Viviana. 2012. “Exploring the boundaries of transcreation in specialized translation.” ESP Across Cultures 9: 95–113.Google Scholar
Gambier, Yves. 2016. “Rapid and radical changes in translation and translation studies.” International Journal of Communication 10: 887–906.Google Scholar
Halverson, Sandra. 2010. “Translation.” In Handbook of Translation Studies, vol. 1, ed. by Yves Gambier, and Luc van Doorslaer, 378–384. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutcheon, Linda. 2006. A theory of adaptation. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1959. “On linguistic aspects of translation.” In On Translation, ed. by Reuben A. Brower, 144–151. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Reprinted in The Translation Studies Reader (2004), ed. by Lawrence Venuti, 138–143. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katan, David. 2016. “Translation at the cross-roads: Time for the transcreational turn?” Perspectives 24 (3): 365–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mossop, Brian. 2016. “‘Intralingual translation’: a desirable concept?” Across Languages and Cultures 17 (1): 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pym, Anthony. 2004. The Moving Text: Localization, Translation and Distribution. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schäffner, Christina. 2012. “Rethinking Transediting.” Meta 57 (4): 866–883. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schäler, Reinhard. 2010. “Localization and translation.” In Handbook of Translation Studies, vol. 1, ed. by Yves Gambier, and Luc van Doorslaer, 378–384. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stetting, Karen. 1989. “Transediting – A New Term for Coping with the Grey Area between Editing and Translating.” In Proceedings from the Fourth Nordic Conference for English Studies, ed. by Graham Caie, 371–382. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Tymoczko, Maria. 2009. “Why Translators Should Want to Internationalize Translation Studies.” The Translator 15 (2): 401–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Doorslaer, Luc. 2018. “Bound to Expand. The Paradigm of Change in Translation Studies.” In Moving Boundaries in Translation Studies, ed. by Helle V. Dam, Matilde Nisbeth Brøgger, and Karen K. Zethsen, 220–230. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Doorslaer, Luc, and Laurence Raw. 2016. “Adaptation Studies and Translation Studies: Very Interactive yet Distinct.” In Border Crossings: Translation Studies and Other Disciplines, ed. by Yves Gambier, and Luc van Doorslaer, 189–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwischenberger, Cornelia. 2019. “From inward to outward: the need for translation studies to become outward-going.” The Translator 25 (3): 256–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Further essential reading
Cattrysse, Patrick. 2014. Descriptive Adaptation Studies: Epistemological and Methodological Issues. Antwerpen: Garant.Google Scholar
Chan, Leo. 2012. “A survey of the ‘new’ discipline of adaptation studies: between translation and interculturalism.” Perspectives 20 (4): 411–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gonne, Maud, Klaartje Merrigan, Reine Meylaerts, and Heleen van Gerwen (eds). 2020. Transfer thinking in translation studies: playing with the black box of cultural transfer. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Littau, Karin. 2011. “First steps towards a media history of translation.” Translation Studies 4 (3): 261–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Doorslaer, Luc. 2020. “Translation Studies: What’s in a name?” Asia Pacific Translation and Intercultural Studies 7 (2): 139–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Dam, Helle V. & Karen Korning Zethsen
2024. Professionals’ views on the concepts of translation: the challenge of categorisation. The Translator 30:3 ► pp. 388 ff. DOI logo
Mertens, Irmak & Sophie Decroupet
2024. Conceptualizing museum translation. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation / Revista Internacional de Traducción 70:5 ► pp. 593 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.