This paper describes part of the work of the Typographic Design for Children project at The University of Reading. The aim was to find out whether children found serif or sans serif types easier or more difficult to read, and whether they found text with infant characters (e.g. variants of ‘a’ and ‘g’) easier or more difficult to read. We listened to 6-year-old children reading in a classroom, using specially-designed, high quality test material set in Gill Sans and Century with and without infant characters. We also asked children for their views about the typefaces used. We used miscue analysis to study tapes of children’s reading to see whether more errors occurred in text set in a particular typeface. The substitution category of miscue was explored in more depth to see whether differences were attributable to typeface. The results show that children in our test group could read text set in Gill and Century equally well.
2016. Assessing visibility, legibility and comprehension for interactive whiteboards (IWBs) vs. computers. Educational Psychology 36:9 ► pp. 1631 ff.
Treiman, Rebecca, Nicole Rosales & Brett Kessler
2016. Characteristics of print in books for preschool children. Writing Systems Research 8:1 ► pp. 120 ff.
Daniel Alvares Lourenço & Solange Galvão Coutinho
2015. Proceedings of the 7th Information Design International Conference, ► pp. 1104 ff.
Simpson, Ian C., Petroula Mousikou, Juan Manuel Montoya & Sylvia Defior
2013. A letter visual-similarity matrix for Latin-based alphabets. Behavior Research Methods 45:2 ► pp. 431 ff.
Wilkins, Arnold, Roanna Cleave, Nicola Grayson & Louise Wilson
2009. Typography for children may be inappropriately designed. Journal of Research in Reading 32:4 ► pp. 402 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.