2024. 2024 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon), ► pp. 590 ff.
Punsongserm, Rachapoom
2023. Effectiveness of Predominant Letterforms in Multi-Viewing Distances: Thai Universal Design Font Versus Familiar Thai Text Fonts. Archives of Design Research 36:4 ► pp. 87 ff.
Schmid, Pascale, Guido Carim jr., David Sargent & Dominique Falla
2023. Type does matter!. Information Design Journal 28:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Elbardawil, Shaima
2022. Legibility research of highway signage typefaces: A critical review and a potential design-centred approach. The Design Journal 25:1 ► pp. 86 ff.
Oderkerk, Chiron A. T. & Sofie Beier
2022. Fonts of wider letter shapes improve letter recognition in parafovea and periphery. Ergonomics 65:5 ► pp. 753 ff.
Beier, Sofie, Chiron A. T. Oderkerk, Birte Bay & Michael Larsen
Dobres, Jonathan, Nadine Chahine, Bryan Reimer, David Gould, Bruce Mehler & Joseph F. Coughlin
2016. Utilising psychophysical techniques to investigate the effects of age, typeface design, size and display polarity on glance legibility. Ergonomics 59:10 ► pp. 1377 ff.
2013. Where Theory Meets Practice: A Critical Comparison of Research into Identifying Letters and Craft Knowledge of Type Design. The Design Journal 16:3 ► pp. 271 ff.
Hazlett, Richard L., Kevin Larson, A. Dawn Shaikh & Barbara S. Chaparo
2012. Letter processing and font information during reading: Beyond distinctiveness, where vision meets design. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 74:1 ► pp. 132 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.