2024. 2024 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon), ► pp. 590 ff.
Punsongserm, Rachapoom
2023. Effectiveness of Predominant Letterforms in Multi-Viewing Distances: Thai Universal Design Font Versus Familiar Thai Text Fonts. Archives of Design Research 36:4 ► pp. 87 ff.
Schmid, Pascale, Guido Carim jr., David Sargent & Dominique Falla
2023. Type does matter!. Information Design Journal 28:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Elbardawil, Shaima
2022. Legibility research of highway signage typefaces: A critical review and a potential design-centred approach. The Design Journal 25:1 ► pp. 86 ff.
Oderkerk, Chiron A. T. & Sofie Beier
2022. Fonts of wider letter shapes improve letter recognition in parafovea and periphery. Ergonomics 65:5 ► pp. 753 ff.
Beier, Sofie, Chiron A. T. Oderkerk, Birte Bay & Michael Larsen
Dobres, Jonathan, Nadine Chahine, Bryan Reimer, David Gould, Bruce Mehler & Joseph F. Coughlin
2016. Utilising psychophysical techniques to investigate the effects of age, typeface design, size and display polarity on glance legibility. Ergonomics 59:10 ► pp. 1377 ff.
2013. Where Theory Meets Practice: A Critical Comparison of Research into Identifying Letters and Craft Knowledge of Type Design. The Design Journal 16:3 ► pp. 271 ff.
Hazlett, Richard L., Kevin Larson, A. Dawn Shaikh & Barbara S. Chaparo
2012. Letter processing and font information during reading: Beyond distinctiveness, where vision meets design. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 74:1 ► pp. 132 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.