For some decades, institutions such as galleries, libraries, archives, and museums (often abbreviated as GLAM institutions) have digitized numerous archival documents and made at least parts of these documents publicly available online. However, there is still a shortage of user-friendly and easily accessible interfaces for various user groups, especially regarding collections based on text sources. After a brief introduction to the research area and the project, this paper discusses a visualization and design study based on a selection of digitized archival material from the Ernst von Glasersfeld estate. We present a conceptual outline of this work and examples concerning discourse mapping, the analysis of argumentative structures as well as some didactical approaches. In so doing, conceptual backgrounds, educational material and design principles are outlined. The paper concludes with critical considerations as regards the limitations of the approaches discussed.
Aspelmeier, J. (2019). “Geschichte selber erkunden”: Geschichtsdidaktische Überlegungen zu Chancen und Grenzen Historischen Lernens im und mit dem Archiv. Archivar. Zeitschrift für Archivwesen,
72
(2), 105–108.
Belkin, N. J. (2008). Some(What) Grand Challenges for Information Retrieval. In C. Macdonald, I. Ounis, V. Plachouras, I. Ruthven, & R. W. White (Eds.), Advances in Information Retrieval (pp. 1–1). Springer.
Bludau, M. J., Brüggemann, V., Busch, A., & Dörk, M. (2020). Reading Traces: Scalable Exploration in Elastic Visualizations of Cultural Heritage Data. Computer Graphics Forum,
39
(3), 77–87.
Bludau, M.-J., Dörk, M., & Heidmann, F. (2019). Relational Perspectives as Situated Visualizations of Art Collections. ADHO 2019 – Utrecht. [URL]
Bradley, A. J., El-Assady, M., Coles, K., Alexander, E., Chen, M., Collins, C., Ja, S., & Wrisley, D. J. (2018). Visualization and the Digital Humanities. IEEE COMPUTER GRAPHICS AND APPLICATIONS, 131.
Brüggemann, V., Bludau, M.-J., & Dörk, M. (2020). Die Falte: Ein Denkraum für interaktive und kritische Datenvisualisierungen. DHd 2020 Spielräume: Digital Humanities zwischen Modellierung und Interpretation. Konferenzabstracts, 114–116.
Butler, B. (2013, April19). Visual Exploration of Australian Prints and Printmaking. The annual conference of Museums and the Web, Portland.
Craft, B., & Cairns, P. (2005). Beyond Guidelines: What Can We Learn from the Visual Information Seeking Mantra?Ninth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV’05), 110–118.
Dörk, M., Carpendale, S., & Williamson, C. (2011). The information flaneur: A fresh look at information seeking. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1215–1224.
Drucker, J. (2011). Humanities Approaches to Graphical Display. Digital Humanities Quarterly,
005
(1).
Drucker, J. (2013). Performative Materiality and Theoretical Approaches to Interface. Digital Humanities Quarterly,
007
(1).
Frantiska, J. J. (2019). Interface development for learning environments: Establishing connections between users and learning. [URL].
Gallner-Holzmann, K. (2020). Visualisierung und Didaktisierung digitaler Archivbestände: MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung, 373–399.
Grünberger, N. (2014). Räume zum Flanieren, Spielen und Lernen. Überlegungen zur Gestaltung von Bildungs- und Lernräumen im Kontext kultureller Entwicklungen. In K. Rummler (Ed.), Lernräume gestalten – Bildungskontexte vielfältig denken (pp. 56–67). Waxmann.
Hahnel, C., Goldhammer, F., Naumann, J., & Kröhne, U. (2016). Effects of linear reading, basic computer skills, evaluating online information, and navigation on reading digital text. Computers in Human Behavior,
55
1(Part A), 486–500.
Hinton, S., & Whitelaw, M. (2010). Exploring the digital commons: An approach to the visualisation of large heritage datasets. Electronic Visualisation and the Arts (EVA 2010).
Jäger, S. (2009). Kritische Diskursanalyse: Eine Einführung. Unrast-Verl.
Jänicke, S. (2016). Valuable Research for Visualization and Digital Humanities: A Balancing Act. /paper/Valuable-Research-for-Visualization-and-Digital-%3A-A-J%C3%A4nicke/1b2663f566266de4cc725e15c92b99a705b86bed
Jänicke, S., Franzini, G., Cheema, M. F., & Scheuermann, G. (2015). On Close and Distant Reading in Digital Humanities: A Survey and Future Challenges. Eurographics Conference on Visualization (EuroVis), 211.
Jänicke, S., Franzini, G., Cheema, M. F., & Scheuermann, G. (2017). Visual Text Analysis in Digital Humanities: Visual Text Analysis in Digital Humanities. Computer Graphics Forum,
36
(6), 226–250.
Krippendorff, K. (2020). Why discourses in action? In K. Krippendorff & N. Halabi (Eds.), Discourses in action (pp. 13–72). Routledge.
Lange, T., & Lux, T. (2004). Historisches Lernen im Archiv: Methoden Historischen Lernens (1., Edition). Wochenschau Verlag.
Lawrence, J., & Reed, C. (2020). Argument Mining: A Survey. Computational Linguistics,
45
(4), 765–818.
Link, J. (1999). Diskursive Ereignisse, Diskurse, Interdiskurse: Sieben Thesen zur Operativität der Diskursanalyse, am Beispiel des Normalismus. In H. Bublitz, A. D. Bührmann, C. Hanke, & A. Seier (Eds.), Das Wuchern der Diskurse: Perspektiven der Diskursanalyse Foucaults (pp. 148–161). Campus Verlag.
Lippi, M., & Torroni, P. (2016). MARGOT: A web server for argumentation mining. Expert Systems with Applications,
65
1, 292–303.
Liu, K. (2013). Designing visitor experience for open-ended creative engagement in art museums: A conceptual multi-touch prototype design. [URL]
Mochales, R., & Moens, M.-F. (2011). Argumentation mining. Artificial Intelligence and Law,
19
(1), 1–22.
Schwabe, A. (2012). Historisches Lernen im World Wide Web: Suchen, flanieren oder forschen? Fachdidaktisch-mediale Konzeption, praktische Umsetzung und empirische Evaluation der regionalhistorischen Website Vimu.info. V & R unipress.
Shneiderman, B. (1996). The Eyes Have It: A Task by Data Type Taxonomy for Information Visualizations. Proceedings / IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, September 3 – 6, 1996, Boulder, Colorado, 336–343.
Supriyanto, Fahana J., & Handoko, S. (2018). Gamification to Improve Digital Data Collection in Ecotourism Management. 2018 2nd East Indonesia Conference on Computer and Information Technology (EIConCIT), 139–142.
Terhart, E. (1999). Konstruktivismus und Unterricht. Gibt es einen neuen Ansatz in der Allgemeinen Didaktik?Zeitschrift für Pädagogik,
45
1, 629–647.
Vann, S. W., & Tawfik, A. A. (2020). Flow Theory and Learning Experience Design in Gamified Learning Environments – Learner and User Experience Research. Games-Based Learning. [URL]
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1990). Zuerst muß man zu zweit sein. Rationale Gedanken zur Liebe. Ernst von Glasersfeld (1990) Zuerst Zeitschrift Der Österreichischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft Für Systemische Therapie,
2
1, 119–135.
Von Glasersfeld, E., & Cobb, P. (1983). Knowledge as Environmental Fit. Man-Environment Systems,
13
(5), 216–224.
Vörös, Z., Rouet, J.-F., & Pléh, C. (2011). Effect of high-level content organizers on hypertext learning. Computers in Human Behavior,
27
(5), 2047–2055.
Wendel, K. (2020). MediaWiki – eine ideale Erschließungssoftware für Archive, Museen und Bibliotheken?Archivalia. [URL]
Whitelaw, M. (2015). Generous Interfaces for Digital Cultural Collections. Digital Humanities Quarterly,
9
(1). [URL]
Winston, E. A., & Monikowski, C. (2000). Discourse Mapping. Developing Textual Cohernce Skills and Interpreters. In C. B. Roy (Ed.), Innovative practices for teaching sign language interpreters. Gallaudet University Press.
Wojton, M. A., Hayde, D., Heimlich, J. E., & Börner, K. (2018). Begin at the Beginning: A Constructionist Model for Interpreting Data Visualizations. Curator: The Museum Journal,
61
(4), 559–574.