Cover not available
Article published In:
Information Design Journal
Vol. 26:3 (2021) ► pp.175–192

Simplification of pharmaceutical pictograms to improve visual acuity

ORCID logo | Royal Danish Academy
ORCID logo | Royal Danish Academy
ORCID logo | Royal Danish Academy
The purpose of pharmaceutical pictograms is to help patients manage their medicinal treatment. However, the pictograms often lack perceptual clarity. While they are frequently tested for aspects such as comprehension, little attention has been paid to their legibility. This paper presents the conception and results of an experiment adapted from the ISO ‘Method for testing perceptual quality’ (ISO 9186-2:2008) to measure the visibility of pictogram elements in two sets: 15 American USP pictograms and 15 redesigned versions reduced in complexity. The statistical analysis did not show reliable significant differences, which indicates that there are more factors at stake.
Keywords: pharmaceutical pictograms, legibility, perimetric complexity, test methods, psychophysics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Medicine leaflets
    • 1.2Legibility versus comprehension
    • 1.3Visual complexity
    • 1.4Crowding
  • 2.Experiment
    • 2.1Respondents
    • 2.2Stimuli
    • 2.3Procedure
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Scoring system
    • 3.2Data analysis
    • 3.3Recognition accuracy
    • 3.4Recognition acuity
  • 4.Qualitative explorations
    • 4.1Perimetric complexity
    • 4.2Effects of crowding
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Identification versus interpretation
    • 5.2Methodological approach and implications of results
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 15 April 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.21003.ped
References (46)
References
Askehave, I., & Zethsen, K. K. (2014). A comparative analysis of the lay-friendliness of Danish EU patient information leaflets from 2000 to 2012. Communication & Medicine, 11 (3), 209–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barros, I. M. C., Alcântara, T. S., Mesquita, A. R., Santos, A. C. O., Paixão, F. P., & Lyra, Jr. (2014). The use of pictograms in the health care: A literature review. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 10 (5), 704–719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beier, S. (2012). Reading Letters: Designing for legibility. BIS Publishers.Google Scholar
Beier, S., Bernard, J.-B., & Castet, E. (2018, June 28). Numeral Legibility and Visual Complexity. Design Research Society Conference 2018. DOI logo
Bernard, J. B., & Chung, S. T. (2011). The dependence of crowding on flanker complexity and target–flanker similarity. Journal of Vision, 11 (8). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersema, T., & Adams, A. S. (2017). Does my symbol sign work? Information Design: Research and Practice, Edited by Alison Black, Paul Luna, Ole Lund and Sue Walker (pp. 303–314). Routlege.Google Scholar
Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226 1, 177–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choi, J. (2011). Literature review: Using pictographs in discharge instructions for older adults with low-literacy skills. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20 (21–22), 2984–2996. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Del Re, L., Vaillancourt, R., Villarreal, G., & Pouliot, A. (2016). Pictograms: Can They Help Patients Recall Medication Safety Instructions? Visible Language, Vol. 50 (1), 127–151.Google Scholar
Dickinson, D., & Gallina, S. (2017). Chapter 47: Information design in medicine package leaflets – How detailed design and usability testing can help medicine users. In Information Design – Research and Practice (pp. 685–700). Routlege.Google Scholar
Directive 92/27/EEC, Council Directive 92/27/EEC of 31 March 1992 on the labelling of medicinal products for human use and on package leaflets OJ No L 113 of 30.4.1992 (1992).Google Scholar
Dowse, R. (2021). Designing and reporting pictogram research: Problems, pitfalls and lessons learnt. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 17 (6), 1208–1215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowse, R., & Ehlers, M. S. (1998). Pictograms in pharmacy. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 6 (2), 109–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamm, L. M., Yeoman, J. P., Anstice, N., & Dakin, S. C. (2018). The Auckland Optotypes: An open-access pictogram set for measuring recognition acuity. Journal of Vision, 18 (3), 13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, L. H. (2006). Using visual concept mapping to communicate medication information to patients with low health literacy; a preliminary study. Second International Conference on Concept Mapping, 621–628.Google Scholar
Houts, P. S., Doak, C. C., Doak, L. G., & Loscalzo, M. J. (2006). The role of pictures in improving health communication: A review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Education and Counseling, 61 (2), 173–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ISO 9186-2:2008. (2008). Graphical symbols – Test methods – Part 2: Method for testing perceptual quality. Geneva: ISO.Google Scholar
Kanji, L., Xu, S., & Cavaco, A. (2018). Assessing the Understanding of Pharmaceutical Pictograms among Cultural Minorities: The Example of Hindu Individuals Communicating in European Portuguese. Pharmacy, 6 (1:22). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, M. G., Kripalani, S., & Weiss, B. D. (2006). Use of pictorial aids in medication instructions: A review of the literature. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 63 (23), 2391–2397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kline, D. W., & Fuchs, P. (1993). The Visibility of Symbolic Highway Signs Can Be Increased among Drivers of All Ages. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 35 (1), 25–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knapp, P., Raynor, D. K., Jebar, A. H., & Price, S. J. (2005). Interpretation of Medication Pictograms by Adults in the UK. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 39 (7–8), 1227–1233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korenevsky, A., Vaillancourt, R., Pouliot, A., Revol, M., Steed, E., Besançon, L., Wahrendorf, M.-S., & Patel, J. R. (2013). How Many Words Does a Picture Really Tell? Cross-sectional Descriptive Study of Pictogram Evaluation by Youth. The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 66 (4), 219–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lalor, S. J. H., Formankiewicz, M. A., & Waugh, S. J. (2016). Crowding and visual acuity measured in adults using paediatric test letters, pictures and symbols. Vision Research, 121 1, 31–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Legge, G. E., Cheung, S.-H., Yu, D., Chung, S. T., Lee, H.-W., & Owens, D. P. (2007). The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading. Journal of Vision, 7 (2), 9–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lesch, M. F., Powell, W. R., Horrey, W. J., & Wogalter, M. S. (2013). The use of contextual cues to improve warning symbol comprehension: Making the connection for older adults. Ergonomics, 56 (8), 1264–1279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pander Maat, H., & Lentz, L. (2010). Improving the usability of patient information. Patient Education and Counseling, Volume 80 (Issue 1), 113–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, P. (2019). Legibility of Pharmaceutical Pictograms: Towards defining a paradigm. Visible Language, 53 (2), 72–99.Google Scholar
Pelli, D. G., Burns, C. W., Farell, B., & Moore-Page, D. C. (2006). Feature detection and letter identification. Vision Research, 46 (28), 4646–4674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radner, W. (2017). Reading charts in ophthalmology. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 255 (8), 1465–1482. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosa, E., Perea, M., & Enneson, P. (2016). The role of letter features in visual-word recognition: Evidence from a delayed segment technique. Acta Psychologica, 169 1, 133–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosen, S., Chakravarthi, R., & Pelli, D. G. (2014). The Bouma law of crowding, revised: Critical spacing is equal across parts, not objects. Journal of Vision, 14 (6), 10–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sayim, B., & Wagemans, J. (2017). Appearance changes and error characteristics in crowding revealed by drawings. Journal of Vision, 17 (11), 8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schubert, T. (2017). Why are digits easier to identify than letters? Neuropsychologia. 95 1, 136–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharif, S. I., Abdulla, M., Yousif, A., & Mohamed, D. (2014). Interpretation of Pharmaceutical Pictograms by Pharmacy and Non-Pharmacy University Students. Pharmacology Pharmacy, 05 (08), 821–827. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strauss, A., & Zender, M. (2017). Design by Consensus: A New Method for Designing Effective Pictograms. Visible Language, 51 (2), 7–33.Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, R., Giby, C. N., Murphy, B. P., Pouliot, A., & Trinneer, A. (2019). Recall of Pharmaceutical Pictograms by Older Adults. The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 72 (6). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waarde, K. van der. (2008). Measuring the quality of information in medical package leaflets: Harmful or helpful? Information Design Journal, 16 (3), 216–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2010). Visual Communication for Medicines: Malignant Assumptions and Benign Design? Visible Language, Vol. 44 (1), 39–69.Google Scholar
. (2017). Chapter 49 Medical information design and its legislation. In A. Black, P. Luna, O. Lund, & S. Walker (Eds.), Information Design – Research and Practice (pp. 715–730). Routlege.Google Scholar
Waarde, K. van der, & Spinillo, C. (2015). Chapter 12: The development of visual information about medicines in Europe. In J. Frascara (Ed.), Information design as principled action: Making information accessible, relevant, understandable, and usable (pp. 185–189). Common Ground Publishing.Google Scholar
WHO. (2019). Medication Safety in Polypharmacy (WHO/UHC/SDS/2019.11). World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Wogalter, M. S., Conzola, V. C., & Smith-Jackson, T. L. (2002). Research-based guidelines for warning design and evaluation. Applied Ergonomics, 33 (3), 219–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wogalter, M. S., La Murray, T. A., Glover, B. L., & Shaver, E. F. (2002). Comprehension of Different Types of Prohibitive Safety Symbols with Glance Exposure. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 46 (19), 1753–1757. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, B., & Szücs, D. (2013). Single-digit Arabic numbers do not automatically activate magnitude representations in adults or in children: Evidence from the symbolic same–different task. Acta Psychologica, 144 (3), 488–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J. Y., Zhang, T., Xue, F., Liu, L., & Yu, C. (2007). Legibility variations of Chinese characters and implications for visual acuity measurement in Chinese reading population. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 48 (5), 2383–2390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zender, M., & Mejía, G. M. (2013). Improving Icon Design: Through Focus on the Role of Individual Symbols in the Construction of Meaning. VISIBLE LANGUAGE, 48 (1), 69–95.Google Scholar