Article published In:
Information Visualization
Edited by Marian Dörk and Isabel Meirelles
[Information Design Journal 25:1] 2019
► pp. 2842
References
van Amstel, F. M. C., Hartmann, T., van der Voort, M. C., & Dewulf, G. P. M. R.
(2016) The social production of design space. Design Studies, 461. 199–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Archer, L. B.
(1968) The structure of design processes. Doctoral thesis. London: Royal College of Art. Available on British Library Ethos (ID: 697935). Also available on RCA Research Repository. Retrieved from [URL]
(1979) Design as a discipline. Design Studies, 1(1), 17–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995) The nature of research. Co-design, 6–13.Google Scholar
Arnheim, R.
(1993) Sketching and the psychology of design. Design Issues, 9(2), 15–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & McLain Smith, D.
(1985) Action Science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Bailey, J., & Pregill, L.
(2014) Speak to the eyes: The history and practice of information visualization. Art Documentation, 33(2), 168–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berners-Lee, T. J.
(1989) Information management: A proposal. CERN-DD-89-001-OC. Geneva: CERN.Google Scholar
Bertin, J.
(1967) Sémiologie graphique. Paris: Mouton/Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Biemann, C., Crane, G. R., Fellbaum, C. D., & Mehler, A.
(2014) Computational humanities: Bridging the gap between computer science and digital humanities (Dagstuhl Seminar 14301). Dagstuhl Reports, 4(7). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyd Davis, S.
(2019) Time machines. In: J. Pilcher (Ed.), Culture, technology and the image. Bristol: Intellect Books. 52–70.Google Scholar
Boyd Davis, S., & Gristwood, S.
(2018) ‘A dialogue between the real-world and the operational model’: the realities of design in Bruce Archer’s 1968 doctoral thesis. Design Studies, 561, 185–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyd Davis, S., & Kräutli, F.
(2015) The idea and image of historical time: Interactions between design and digital humanities. Visible Language, 49(3) [Special issue ‘Critical making: Design and the digital humanities’], 100–119.Google Scholar
Buchanan, R.
(1992) Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bush, V.
(1945) As we may think. The Atlantic Monthly, July 1945.Google Scholar
Cockburn, A., Karlson, A., & Bederson, B. B.
(2009) A review of overview+detail, zooming, and focus+context interfaces. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cottrell, S.
(2017) Understanding textual uncertainty in dates using interactive timelines. Proc. Electronic Visualisation and the Arts, EVA 2017 (pp. 68–73). London: British Computer Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crilly, N., Maier, A., & Clarkson, P. J.
(2008) Representing artefacts as media: Modelling the relationship between designer intent and consumer experience. International Journal of Design, 2(3), 15–27.Google Scholar
Dávila, P.
(2017) Visualization as assemblage. Information Design Journal, 23(1) [‘Information Visualization’], 19–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörk, M., Pietsch, C., & Credico, G.
(2017) One view is not enough: High-level visualizations of a large cultural collection. Information Design Journal, 23(1), 39–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dorst, K., & Cross, N.
(2001) Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drucker, J.
(1984) Letterpress language: Typography as a medium for the visual representation of language. Leonardo, 17(1), 8–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Graphesis: the visual production of knowledge in a digital era. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Drucker, J., & Nowviskie, B.
(2004) Speculative computing: Temporal modelling. In: S. Schreibman, R. Siemens, & J. Unsworth (Eds.), A companion to digital humanities (pp. 431–447). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engelbart, D. C.
(1962) Augmenting human intellect: A conceptual framework. Summary Report AFOSR-3233. Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Research Institute. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frayling, C.
(1993) Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1(1). London: Royal College of Art.Google Scholar
Glanville, R.
(2007) Try again. Fail again. Fail better: The cybernetics in design and the design in cybernetics. Kybernetes, 36(9/10), 1173–1206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glanville, R., & Pak, B.
(2010) Quasi entailment mesh. European Meetings on Cybernetics and Systems Research. University of Vienna 6–9 April 2010 [n.p.].Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, G.
(1991) The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 123–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goody, J.
(1987) The Interface between the written and the oral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. A.
(1986) The muse learns to write. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, E. B.
(2018) Building video game adaptations of dramatic and literary texts. In L. Levenberg, T. Neilson, & D. Rheams (Eds.), Research methods for the digital humanities (pp. 173–194). London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, E.
(1999) Cognitive artifacts. In R. A. Wilson & F. C. Keil (Eds.), MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences (pp. 126–127). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jänicke, S.
(2016) Valuable research for visualization and digital humanities: A balancing act. Workshop on Visualization for the Digital Humanities, VisWeek, Hilton Baltimore hotel, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 23–28 October 2016.
Kimbell, L.
(2011) Rethinking design thinking: Part I. Design and Culture, 3(3), 285–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, L. F.
(2013) The image of absence: Archival silence, data visualization, and James Hemings. American Literature, 85(4), 661–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kräutli, F.
(2016) Visualising cultural data: Exploring digital collections through timeline visualisations. PhD thesis, Royal College of Art, London. Retrieved from [URL]
Kräutli, F., & Boyd Davis, S.
(2013) Known unknowns: Representing uncertainty in historical time. In K. Ng, J. P. Bowen, & S. McDaid (Eds.), Proceedings of EVA London, British Computer Society, London, 29–31 July 2013 (pp. 61–68). London: British Computer Society.Google Scholar
Lloyd, D., & Dykes, J.
(2011) Human-centered approaches in geovisualization design: Investigating multiple methods through a long-term case study. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12), 2498–2507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacEachren, A. M.
Nelson, T. H.
(1974) Computer lib / Dream machines. [Self-published].Google Scholar
Noël, G.
(2014) Design education: Creating diagrams to help students understand complex problems. Information Design Journal, 21(2), 88–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norman, D. A.
(1991) Cognitive artifacts. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ong, W. J.
(1982) Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen & Co.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pask, G., Kallikourdis, D., & Scott, B. C. E.
(1975) The representation of knowables. International Journal for Man-Machine Studies, 7(1), 15–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Priestley, J.
(1764) A description of a chart of biography. Warrington: British Library General Reference Collection.Google Scholar
Ratto, M.
(2011) Critical making: Conceptual and material studies in technology and social life. Information Society, 27(4), 252–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rittel, H.
(1972) On the planning crisis: Systems analysis of the ‘first and second generations’. Bedriftsøkonomen, 81, 390–396.Google Scholar
Rudd, J., Stern, K., & Isensee, S.
(1996) Low vs. high-fidelity prototyping debate. Interactions, 3(1), 76–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rust, C., Hawkins, S., Whiteley, G., Wilson, A., & Roddis, J.
(2000) Knowledge and the artefact. In D. Durling, & K. Friedman (Eds.), Proceedings of Doctoral Education in Design Conference (pp. 395–404). La Clusaz, France 8–12 July 2000.Google Scholar
Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y.
(1996) External cognition: How do graphical representations work? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 451, 185–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schön, D. A.
(1983) The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A.
(1956) Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spivey, M. J.
(2007) Redesigning our theories of human information processing. Information Design Journal, 15(3), 261–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Staley, D.
(2017) On the “maker turn” in the humanities. In J. Sayers (Ed.), Making things and drawing boundaries: Experiments in the digital humanities (Debates in the digital humanities). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, J.
(2013) Design as communication in microstrategy: Strategic sensemaking and sensegiving mediated through designed artifacts. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 27(2), 133–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweeting, B.
(2016) Design research as a variety of second order cybernetic practice. Constructivist Foundations, 11(3), 572–579.Google Scholar
Thompson Klein, J.
(2017) The boundary work of making in digital humanities. In J. Sayers (Ed.), Making things and drawing boundaries: Experiments in the digital humanities (Debates in the Digital Humanities). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Trouillot, M. R.
(2015) Silencing the past: Power and the production of history (2nd ed.). Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Vane, O.
(2019) Cultural visualisation and the value of simplicity. Europeana Tech Insight, 111: Generous Interfaces. Retrieved from [URL]
Visser, W.
(2006) The cognitive artifacts of designing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warde, B.
(2009) The crystal goblet, or why printing should be invisible. In H. Armstrong (Ed.), Graphic Design Theory: readings from the field (pp. 39–43). New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
Whitelaw, Mitchell
(2015) Generous interfaces for digital cultural collections. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 9(1), Retrieved from [URL]
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Boyd Davis, Stephen, Olivia Vane & Florian Kräutli
2021. Can I believe what I see? Data visualization and trust in the humanities. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 46:4  pp. 522 ff. DOI logo
Brehmer, Matthew, Robert Kosara & Carmen Hull
2022. Generative Design Inspiration for Glyphs with Diatoms. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 28:1  pp. 389 ff. DOI logo
Hendrie, Maggie, Hillary Mushkin, Santiago Lombeyda & Scott Davidoff
2022. JPL/Caltech ArtCenter. Information Design Journal 27:1  pp. 76 ff. DOI logo
Oberbichler, Sarah, Katharina Gallner-Holzmann & Theo Hug
2021. Generous and inviting interfaces revisited. Information Design Journal 26:2  pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Parsons, Paul
2022. Understanding Data Visualization Design Practice. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 28:1  pp. 665 ff. DOI logo
Savasta, Daniele & Zeynep Tuna Ultav
2022. Exposing Collections through Interaction Ecologies: A Prototype for Architectural Ephemera. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 15:4  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 january 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.