Article published in:
Information Visualization
Edited by Marian Dörk and Isabel Meirelles
[Information Design Journal 25:1] 2019
► pp. 28–42

Design as externalization

Enabling research

| Royal College of Art
| Royal College of Art
The article is concerned with a central contribution of designing to information visualization in the digital humanities. The activity is characterized as one of externalization, instantiation in visible or tangible form of ideas. A spectrum of different interpretations of this process in the existing literature is discussed. The arguments are illustrated with recent practical examples from the authors’ own work in designing with a range of cultural organizations. The article concludes with reflections on how projects may best benefit from this work of design, empowering the designer as a co-researcher, alongside the historian, curator or other humanities scholar.
Keywords: data visualization, design methods, design research, prototyping, externalization, digital humanities
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 16 March 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.25.1.03van

Full-text

Design as externalization
References

References

van Amstel, F. M. C., Hartmann, T., van der Voort, M. C., & Dewulf, G. P. M. R.
(2016) The social production of design space. Design Studies, 46. 199–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Archer, L. B.
(1968) The structure of design processes. Doctoral thesis. London: Royal College of Art. Available on British Library Ethos (ID: 697935). Also available on RCA Research Repository. Retrieved from http://​researchonline​.rca​.ac​.uk​/2949/
(1979) Design as a discipline. Design Studies, 1(1), 17–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) The nature of research. Co-design, 6–13.Google Scholar
Arnheim, R.
(1993) Sketching and the psychology of design. Design Issues, 9(2), 15–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & McLain Smith, D.
(1985) Action Science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Bailey, J., & Pregill, L.
(2014) Speak to the eyes: The history and practice of information visualization. Art Documentation, 33(2), 168–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berners-Lee, T. J.
(1989) Information management: A proposal. CERN-DD-89-001-OC. Geneva: CERN.Google Scholar
Bertin, J.
(1967) Sémiologie graphique. Paris: Mouton/Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Biemann, C., Crane, G. R., Fellbaum, C. D., & Mehler, A.
(2014) Computational humanities: Bridging the gap between computer science and digital humanities (Dagstuhl Seminar 14301). Dagstuhl Reports, 4(7). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyd Davis, S.
(2019) Time machines. In: J. Pilcher (Ed.), Culture, technology and the image. Bristol: Intellect Books. 52–70.Google Scholar
Boyd Davis, S., & Gristwood, S.
(2018) ‘A dialogue between the real-world and the operational model’: the realities of design in Bruce Archer’s 1968 doctoral thesis. Design Studies, 56, 185–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyd Davis, S., & Kräutli, F.
(2015) The idea and image of historical time: Interactions between design and digital humanities. Visible Language, 49(3) [Special issue ‘Critical making: Design and the digital humanities’], 100–119.Google Scholar
Buchanan, R.
(1992) Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bush, V.
(1945) As we may think. The Atlantic Monthly, July 1945.Google Scholar
Cockburn, A., Karlson, A., & Bederson, B. B.
(2009) A review of overview+detail, zooming, and focus+context interfaces. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cottrell, S.
(2017) Understanding textual uncertainty in dates using interactive timelines. Proc. Electronic Visualisation and the Arts, EVA 2017 (pp. 68–73). London: British Computer Society. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crilly, N., Maier, A., & Clarkson, P. J.
(2008) Representing artefacts as media: Modelling the relationship between designer intent and consumer experience. International Journal of Design, 2(3), 15–27.Google Scholar
Dávila, P.
(2017) Visualization as assemblage. Information Design Journal, 23(1) [‘Information Visualization’], 19–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dörk, M., Pietsch, C., & Credico, G.
(2017) One view is not enough: High-level visualizations of a large cultural collection. Information Design Journal, 23(1), 39–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dorst, K., & Cross, N.
(2001) Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425–437. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drucker, J.
(1984) Letterpress language: Typography as a medium for the visual representation of language. Leonardo, 17(1), 8–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Graphesis: the visual production of knowledge in a digital era. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Drucker, J., & Nowviskie, B.
(2004) Speculative computing: Temporal modelling. In: S. Schreibman, R. Siemens, & J. Unsworth (Eds.), A companion to digital humanities (pp. 431–447). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Engelbart, D. C.
(1962) Augmenting human intellect: A conceptual framework. Summary Report AFOSR-3233. Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Research Institute. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frayling, C.
(1993) Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1(1). London: Royal College of Art.Google Scholar
Glanville, R.
(2007) Try again. Fail again. Fail better: The cybernetics in design and the design in cybernetics. Kybernetes, 36(9/10), 1173–1206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glanville, R., & Pak, B.
(2010) Quasi entailment mesh. European Meetings on Cybernetics and Systems Research. University of Vienna, 6–9 April 2010 [n.p.].Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, G.
(1991) The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 123–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goody, J.
(1987) The Interface between the written and the oral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. A.
(1986) The muse learns to write. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, E. B.
(2018) Building video game adaptations of dramatic and literary texts. In L. Levenberg, T. Neilson, & D. Rheams (Eds.), Research methods for the digital humanities (pp. 173–194). London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, E.
(1999) Cognitive artifacts. In R. A. Wilson & F. C. Keil (Eds.), MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences (pp. 126–127). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jänicke, S.
(2016) Valuable research for visualization and digital humanities: A balancing act. Workshop on Visualization for the Digital Humanities, VisWeek, Hilton Baltimore hotel, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 23–28 October 2016.
Kimbell, L.
(2011) Rethinking design thinking: Part I. Design and Culture, 3(3), 285–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klein, L. F.
(2013) The image of absence: Archival silence, data visualization, and James Hemings. American Literature, 85(4), 661–688. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kräutli, F.
(2016) Visualising cultural data: Exploring digital collections through timeline visualisations. PhD thesis, Royal College of Art, London. Retrieved from http://​researchonline​.rca​.ac​.uk​/1774/
Kräutli, F., & Boyd Davis, S.
(2013) Known unknowns: Representing uncertainty in historical time. In K. Ng, J. P. Bowen, & S. McDaid (Eds.), Proceedings of EVA London, British Computer Society, London, 29–31 July 2013 (pp. 61–68). London: British Computer Society.Google Scholar
Lloyd, D., & Dykes, J.
(2011) Human-centered approaches in geovisualization design: Investigating multiple methods through a long-term case study. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12), 2498–2507. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacEachren, A. M.
(2001) An evolving cognitive-semiotic approach to geographic visualization and knowledge construction. Information Design Journal, 10(1), 26–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, T. H.
(1974) Computer lib / Dream machines. [Self-published].Google Scholar
Noël, G.
(2014) Design education: Creating diagrams to help students understand complex problems. Information Design Journal, 21(2), 88–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norman, D. A.
(1991) Cognitive artifacts. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ong, W. J.
(1982) Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen & Co.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pask, G., Kallikourdis, D., & Scott, B. C. E.
(1975) The representation of knowables. International Journal for Man-Machine Studies, 7(1), 15–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Priestley, J.
(1764) A description of a chart of biography. Warrington: British Library General Reference Collection.Google Scholar
Ratto, M.
(2011) Critical making: Conceptual and material studies in technology and social life. Information Society, 27(4), 252–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rittel, H.
(1972) On the planning crisis: Systems analysis of the ‘first and second generations’. Bedriftsøkonomen, 8, 390–396.Google Scholar
Rudd, J., Stern, K., & Isensee, S.
(1996) Low vs. high-fidelity prototyping debate. Interactions, 3(1), 76–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rust, C., Hawkins, S., Whiteley, G., Wilson, A., & Roddis, J.
(2000) Knowledge and the artefact. In D. Durling, & K. Friedman (Eds.), Proceedings of Doctoral Education in Design Conference (pp. 395–404). La Clusaz, France, 8–12 July 2000.Google Scholar
Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y.
(1996) External cognition: How do graphical representations work? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 185–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schön, D. A.
(1983) The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A.
(1956) Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spivey, M. J.
(2007) Redesigning our theories of human information processing. Information Design Journal, 15(3), 261–265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Staley, D.
(2017) On the “maker turn” in the humanities. In J. Sayers (Ed.), Making things and drawing boundaries: Experiments in the digital humanities (Debates in the digital humanities). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, J.
(2013) Design as communication in microstrategy: Strategic sensemaking and sensegiving mediated through designed artifacts. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 27(2), 133–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweeting, B.
(2016) Design research as a variety of second order cybernetic practice. Constructivist Foundations, 11(3), 572–579.Google Scholar
Thompson Klein, J.
(2017) The boundary work of making in digital humanities. In J. Sayers (Ed.), Making things and drawing boundaries: Experiments in the digital humanities (Debates in the Digital Humanities). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Trouillot, M. R.
(2015) Silencing the past: Power and the production of history (2nd ed.). Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Vane, O.
(2019) Cultural visualisation and the value of simplicity. Europeana Tech Insight, 11: Generous Interfaces. Retrieved from https://​pro​.europeana​.eu​/page​/issue​-11​-generous​-interfaces
Visser, W.
(2006) The cognitive artifacts of designing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Warde, B.
(2009) The crystal goblet, or why printing should be invisible. In H. Armstrong (Ed.), Graphic Design Theory: readings from the field (pp. 39–43). New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
Whitelaw, Mitchell
(2015) Generous interfaces for digital cultural collections. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 9(1), Retrieved from http://​www​.digitalhumanities​.org​/dhq​/vol​/9​/1​/000205​/000205​.html