Article published in:
Information Design Journal
Vol. 25:3 (2019) ► pp. 259264
References

References

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E.
(2016) e-Learning and the science of instruction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E.
(2016) Effects of observing the instructor draw diagrams on learning from multimedia messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(4), 528–546. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fiorella, L., Stull, A., Kuhlmann, S., & Mayer, R. E.
in press). Instructor presence in video lectures: The role of dynamic drawings, eye contact, and instructor visibility. Journal of Educational Psychology.
Fiorella, L., van Gog, T., Hoogerheide, V., & Mayer, R. E.
(2017) It’s all a matter of perspective: Viewing first-person video modeling examples promotes learning of an assembly task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(5), 653–665. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E.
(1997) The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 92–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 414–434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. E.
(2020) Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Applying the science of learning. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E., & DaPra, C. S.
(2012) An embodiment effect in computer-based learning with animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(3), 239–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. E., Fennell, S., Farmer, L., & Campbell, J.
(2004) A personalization effect in multimedia learning: Students learn better when words are in conversational style rather than formal style. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 389–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. E., Griffith, E., Jurkowitz, I. T. N., & Rothman, D.
(2008) Increased interestingness of extraneous details in a multimedia science presentation leads to decreased learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14(4), 329–339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. E., & Jackson, J.
(2005) The case for coherence in scientific explanations: Quantitative details can hurt qualitative understanding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(1), 13–18.Google Scholar
Reynolds, G.
(2012) Presentation Zen (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
van Merrienboer, J. J. G. & Kester, L.
(2014) The four-component instructional design model: Multimedia principles in environments for complex learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed.; pp. 104–148). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, N., Johnson, W. L., Mayer, R. E., Rizzo, P., Shaw, E., & Collins, H.
(2008) The politeness effect: Pedagogical agents and learning outcomes. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(2), 98–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar