Cover not available
Part of
Portuguese-Spanish Interfaces: Diachrony, synchrony, and contact
Edited by Patrícia Amaral and Ana Maria Carvalho
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 1] 2014
► pp. 1–8

Introduction

ORCID logo | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
ORCID logo | University of Arizona
Published online: 30 October 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.1.01int
References (23)
References
Abreu, M.I. (1964). Estudo comparativo de padrões estruturais em Português e em Espanhol. Luso-Brazilian Review, 1(2), 89–96.Google Scholar
Arriola, P.M. (1973). Portuguese and Spanish homonyms and homophones. Hispania, 56(2), 426–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Azevedo, M. (2005). Portuguese linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beardsley, W. (1953). A brief comparison of Spanish and Portuguese syntax. Hispania, 25(1), 420–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beswick, J. (2002). Galician language planning and implications for regional identity: Restoration or elimination? National Identities, 4(3), 257–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2005). Linguistic homogeneity in Galician and Portuguese borderland communities. Estudios de Sociolingüística, 6(1), 39–64.Google Scholar
. (2007). Regional nationalism in Spain. Language use and ethnic identity in Galicia. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Brakel, A. (1980). Infinitives, subjects, word order, and case in Portuguese and Spanish. Hispania, 63(1), 85–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cassol, A. (1969). Português - Espanhol: As preposições para e por. Lenguaje y Ciencias, 32, 21–26.Google Scholar
Cavell, A.J. (1972). The problem of the personal infinitive in Portuguese and Spanish. Jackson State College Review, 4(1), 39–59.Google Scholar
Clements, J.C. (2009). The linguistic legacy of Spanish and Portuguese: colonial expansion and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clements, J.C., Amaral, P., & Luís, A. (2008). El Barranqueño: Una lengua de contacto en Iberia. Estudios Portugueses 7, Revista de Filología Portuguesa, 37–46.Google Scholar
. (2011). Spanish in contact with Portuguese: The case of Barranquenho. In M. Diaz-Campos (Ed.), The handbook of Hispanic sociolinguistics (pp. 395–417). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldman, D. (1967). A comparison of the segmental phonemes of Brazilian Portuguese and American Spanish. Linguistics, 29, 44–57Google Scholar
King, L.D., & Suñer, M. (1980). On the notion of stativity in Spanish and Portuguese. Contemporary studies in Romance languages: Proceedings of the eighth annual symposium on Romance languages (pp. 183–201). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lipski, J. (2010). Spanish and Portuguese in contact. In R. Hickey (Ed.), Handbook of language contact (pp. 550–580). New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). Encontros fronteiriços espanhol-português. Ideação, 13(2), 83–100.Google Scholar
Mattoso Camara, J., Jr. (1972). The Portuguese language. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Maiden, M. (2005). Morphological autonomy and diachrony. In G. Booij and J. van Marle (Eds.). Yearbook of Morphology 2004 (pp. 137–175). Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/1-4020-2900-4_6Google Scholar
Navas Sánchez-Élez, M.V. (2011). El barranqueño: Un modelo de lenguas en contacto. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid/Centro de Linguística, Universidade de Lisboa.Google Scholar
Perini, M. (2002). Modern Portuguese: A reference grammar. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Radefeldt, J. (1972). Readings in Portuguese linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Schmitz, J.R. (1970). Some lexical constrasts in Spanish and Portuguese: Contrastive analysis. Hispania, 53(4), 976–979. DOI logoGoogle Scholar