Cover not available
Part of
Portuguese-Spanish Interfaces: Diachrony, synchrony, and contact
Edited by Patrícia Amaral and Ana Maria Carvalho
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 1] 2014
► pp. 11–34

The position of Ibero-Romance in the Romania and of Portuguese within Ibero-Romance

| The Ohio State University
This chapter places major linguistic varieties within the Iberian Peninsula vis-à-vis each other and also in relation to the broader Romance context. The largely a-theoretical description is based on an ad hoc set of salient surface aspects, from phonetics to morphology and syntax. Rather than surveying the entire Romania in detail, the focus shifts more to the languages of the Iberian Peninsula, and within this domain, Portuguese will be emphasized, reversing the frequent choice of Castilian/Spanish as the Iberian pivot. This typological plus historical approach characterizes Portuguese not only in its intimate connections to other Ibero-Romance varieties, but also in its sometimes striking discrepancies from Spanish, and affinities with more distant Romance languages.
Published online: 30 October 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.1.03wan
References (70)
References
Aebischer, P. (1948). Contribution à la protohistoire des articles ILLE et IPSE dans les langues romanes. Cultura Neolatina, 8, 181–204.Google Scholar
Alvar, M. (1953). El dialecto aragonés. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Álvarez, R., & Xove, X. (2011). Gramática da lingua galega. Lugo: Galaxia.Google Scholar
Alonso, D. (1962). La fragmentación fonética peninsular. In Enciclopedia Língüística Hispánica, Suplemento I. Madrid: CSIC.Google Scholar
Badía Margarit, A.M. (1947). Los complementos pronominalo-adverbiales derivados de ibi e inde en la península ibérica. Revista de Filología Española, 38.Google Scholar
. (1951). Gramática histórica catalana. Barcelona: Noguer.Google Scholar
Baldinger, K. (1971). La formación de los dominios lingüísticos en la Península Ibérica. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Barbosa, P. (1996). Clitic placement in European Portuguese and the position of subjects. In A. Halpern & A.M. Zwicky (Eds.), Approaching second: Second position clitics and related phenomena (pp. 1–40). Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bartoli, M. (1925). Introduzione alla neolinguistica (princìpi – scopi – metodi). Geneva: Olschki.Google Scholar
Bertoni, G. (1925). Breviario di neolinguistica. Modena: Società tipografica modenese.Google Scholar
Bossong, G. (1991). Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. In D. Wanner & D.A. Kibbee (Eds.), New analyses in Romance linguistics (pp. 143–170). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandi, L., & Cordin, P. (1989). Two Italian dialects and the null subject parameter. In O. Jaeggli & K. Safir (Eds.), The null subject parameter (pp. 111–142). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butt, J., & Benjamin C. (2004). A new reference grammar for modern Spanish (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Cunha, C., & Cintra, L.F.L. (1984). Nova gramática do português contemporâneo. Lisboa: Sá da Costa.Google Scholar
Ebneter, T. (1994). Syntax des gesprochenen Rätoromanischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Entwistle, W.J. (1951). The Spanish language together with Portuguese, Catalan and Basque. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Ferreiro, M. (1999). Gramática histórica galega: I. Fonética e morfosintaxe. Santiago de Compostela: Laiovento.Google Scholar
Fischer, S. (2002). The Catalan clitic system. A diachronic perspective on its syntax and phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Franzén, T. (1939). Étude sur la syntaxe des pronoms personnels sujets en ancien français. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells.Google Scholar
Galmés de Fuentes, Á. (1983). Dialectología mozárabe. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Green, J.N. (1988). Spanish. In M. Harris & N. Vincent (Eds.), The Romance languages (pp. 79–130). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. (1988). Rhaeto-Romance. In M. Harris & N. Vincent (Eds.), The Romance languages (pp. 351–390). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Harris, M. (1988). The Romance languages. In M. Harris & N. Vincent (Eds.), The Romance languages (pp. 1–33). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Harris, M., & Vincent N. (Eds.), (1988). The Romance languages. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hofmann, J.B., & Szantyr, A. (1972). Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Institutul de Lingvistică din București. (1954). Gramatica limbii romîne (Vols. 1–2). Bucharest: Editura Academiei Republicii Populare Romîne.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, O., & Safir, K.J. (1989). The null subject parameter and parametric theory. In O. Jaeggli & K.J. Safir (Eds.), The null subject parameter (pp. 1–44). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kato, M.A., & Negrão, E.V. (2000). Brazilian Portuguese and the null-subject parameter. Frankfurt: Vervuert & Madrid: Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Kayne, R.S. (2000). Microparametric syntax: Some introductory remarks. In R.S. Kayne (Ed.), Parameters and universals (pp. ix-xviii). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lapesa, R. (1980). Historia de la lengua española (8th ed.). Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Lausberg, H. (1956–62). Romanische Sprachwissenschaft (Vols. 1–3). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lloyd, P.M. (1987). From Latin to Spanish. Philadelphia, PA: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
McMahon, A.M.S. (1994). Understanding language change. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maiden, M. (1991). Interactive morphonology: Metaphony in Italy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mallinson, G. (1988). Rumanian. In M. Harris & N. Vincent (Eds.), The Romance languages (pp. 391–419). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Martins, A.M. (1994). Clíticos na história do português. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Lisbon.Google Scholar
Mattoso Câmara, J. (1975). História e estrutura da língua portuguesa. Rio de Janeiro: Padrão.Google Scholar
Menéndez Pidal, R. (1950). Orígenes del español (3rd ed.). Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
. (1962). Manual de gramática histórica española (11th ed.). Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, W. (1897–1900). Grammaire des langues romanes (Vols. 1–4). Paris: Champion (Reprint, New York: Stechert, 1923).Google Scholar
. (1920). Einführung in das Studium der romanischen Spachwissenschaft. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
. (1925). Das Katalanische: Seine Stellung zum Spanischen und Provenzalischen. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Mussafia, A. (1886). Una particolarità sintattica della lingua italiana dei primi secoli. In G.I. Ascoli et al. (Eds.), Miscellanea di filologia e linguistica in memoria di N. Caix e U. A. Canello (pp. 255–261). Florence: LeMonnier.Google Scholar
Parkinson, S. (1988). Portuguese. In M. Harris & N. Vincent (Eds.), The Romance languages (pp. 131–169). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Penny, R. (2002). A history of the Spanish language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pereira Barbosa, M.P. (2009). Two kinds of subject pro. Studia Linguistica, 63(1), 2–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poletto, C. (2000). The higher functional field: Evidence from northern Italian dialects. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Pope, M.K. (1952). From Latin to modern French with special consideration of Anglo-Norman. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, R. (1996). The Romance languages. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ramsden, H. (1963). Weak pronoun position in the early Romance languages. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Renzi, L. (1985). Nuova introduzione alla filologia romanza. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Renzi, L, Vanelli, L., & Benincà, P. (1985). Typologie des pronoms sujets dans les langues romanes. In C. Touratier (Ed.), Linguistique descriptive: Phonétique, morphologie et lexique (Actes du XVII CILPR) (pp. 161–176). Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, G. (1935). Le gascon: Études de philologie pyrénéenne. Halle/Saale: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
. (1966–69). Grammatica storica della ingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti (Vols. 1–3). Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Salvi, G. (2004). La formazione della struttura di frase romanza. Ordine delle parole e clitici dal latino alle lingue romanze antiche. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, S.A., & Cacoullos, R.T. (2008). Defaults and indeterminacy in temporal grammaticalization: The ‘perfect’ road to perfective. Language Variation and Change, 20(1), 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva Neto, S. (1970). História da língua portuguesa. Lisbon: Sá da Costa.Google Scholar
Tagliavini, C. (1964). Le origini delle língue neolatine (3rd ed.). Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar
Tobler, A. (1912). Reseña de J. Le Coultre, De l’ordre des mots dans Chrétien de Troyes. In Vermischte Beiträge zur französischen Grammatik (Vol. 5; pp. 395–414). Leipzig: Hirzel. (Original work published 1875)Google Scholar
Vázquez Cuesta, P., & Mendes da Luz, M.A. (1971). Gramática portuguesa (Vols. 1–2). Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Veny, J. (1982). Els parlars catalans: Síntesi de dialectologia (3rd ed.). Mallorca: Moll.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, J. (1892). Über ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung. Indogermanische Forschungen, 1, 333–436.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wanner, D. (1987). The development of Romance clitic pronouns: From Latin to early Romance. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1996). Second position clitics in Medieval Romance. In A. Halpern & A.M. Zwicky (Eds.), Approaching second: Second position clitics and related phenomena (pp. 537–578). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
. (2000). La pérdida del clítico adverbial y en castellano. In J. Kabatek & D. Jacob (Eds.), Lengua medieval y tradiciones discursivas en la Península Ibérica. Descripción gramatical, pragmática histórica, metodología (pp. 1–28). Frankfurt: Vervuert & Madrid: Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Wartburg, W.V. (1950). Die Ausgliederung der romanischen Sprachräume. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M.W. (1988). Catalan. In M. Harris & N. Vincent (Eds.), The Romance languages (pp.170–208). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Whitlam, J. (2010). Modern Brazilian Portuguese grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williams, E.B. (1938). From Latin to Portuguese. Historical phonology and morphology of the Portuguese language. Philadelphia, PA: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
Zamora Vicente, A. (1967). Dialectología española (3rd ed.). Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar