Cover not available
Part of
Portuguese-Spanish Interfaces: Diachrony, synchrony, and contact
Edited by Patrícia Amaral and Ana Maria Carvalho
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 1] 2014
► pp. 35–64

Syntactic change in Portuguese and Spanish

Divergent and parallel patterns of linguistic splitting

ORCID logo | University of Lisbon (CLUL | FLUL)
This chapter describes two cases of divergent syntactic change between Portuguese and Spanish, namely clitic placement and post-nominal algum/alguno. While both changes feature instances of linguistic splitting from a former unity during the Middle Ages, they nevertheless exhibit different patterns of development, illustrating what the author calls the ‘inverted-Y’ and the ‘I’ patterns of change. Under the former, the two languages start diverging as soon as grammatical change is set in motion. Under the latter, the two languages show a similar/parallel path of change and eventually split apart when one of them goes a step further than the other. Clitic placement in the history of Spanish and Portuguese exemplifies the ‘inverted-Y’ pattern, post-nominal algum/alguno exemplifies the ‘I’ pattern of change.
Published online: 30 October 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.1.04mar
References (70)
References
Badia Margarit, A.M. (1947). Los complementos pronominalo-adverbiales derivados de IBI e INDE en la Península Ibérica. Anejos de la Revista de Filología Española, 38.Google Scholar
Barry, A.K. (1987). Clitic pronoun position in thirteenth-century Spanish. The Hispanic Review, 55, 213–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Batllori, M., Iglésias, N., & Martins, A.M. (2005). Sintaxi dels clítics pronominal sen el catalã medieval. Caplletra 38, 137–177.Google Scholar
Benincà, P. (1995). Complement clitics in medieval Romance: The Tobler-Mussafia Law. In A. Battye & I. Roberts (Eds.), Clause structure and language change (pp. 325–344). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bosque, I. (1996). La polaridad modal. Actas del Cuarto Congreso de Hispanistas de Asia, 7–14. Seúl: Asociación Asiática de Hispanistas.Google Scholar
Bouzouita, M. (2008). The diachronic development of Spanish clitic placement. Ph.D. dissertation. King’s College London.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, A. (1991). On pronoun movement: The Italian dative loro. Probus, 3(2),127–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1999). Pronouns in Germanic and Romance languages: An overview. In H. van Riemsdijk (Ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe (pp. 33–82). Berlin: Mouton the Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, A., & Starke, M. (1996). Deficient pronouns: A view from Germanic: A study in the unified description of Germanic and Romance. In H. Thráinsson, S.D. Epstein, & S. Peter (Eds.), Germanic syntax (pp. 21–65). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, A. (1999). The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In H. van Riemsdijk (Ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe (pp. 145–233). Berlin: Mouton the Gruyter.Google Scholar
Castro, I. (1991). Curso de História da Língua Portuguesa. Lisboa: Universidade Aberta.Google Scholar
. (2002). Sur le bilinguisme littéraire castillan-portugais. La littérature d’auteurs portugais en langue castillane: Arquivos do Centro Cultural Português, 40, 11–23.Google Scholar
Chenery, W.H. (1905). Object-pronouns in dependent clauses: A study in Old Spanish word-order. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 20, 1–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cintra, L.F.L.(1954). Crónica Geral de Espanha de 1344: Edição crítica do texto português (Vol. 2). Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional- Casa da Moeda.Google Scholar
Corpus do Português: Davies, Mark and Michael Ferreira. (2006). Corpus do Português (45 million words, 1300s–1900s). Available online at <[URL]>Google Scholar
Lisboa, J., Reis Miranda, T.C.P., & Olival, F. (Eds.). (2002). Gazetas manuscritas da Biblioteca pública de Évora (1729–1731) (Vol. 1). Lisboa: Colibri, CIDEHUS, CHC-UNL.Google Scholar
. (Eds.). (2005). Gazetas manuscritas da Biblioteca pública de Évora (1732–1734) (Vol. 2). Lisboa: Colibri, CIDEHUS, CHC-UNL.Google Scholar
. (Eds.). (2007). Gazetas manuscritas da Biblioteca pública de Évora (1735–1737) (Vol. 3). Lisboa: CIDEHUS, CHC-UNL. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Couto, D. (1782). Da Ásia de diogo do couto. Decada setima. Parte primeira. Lisboa: Na Regia Oficina Typografica. (Original work published 1616).Google Scholar
Duarte, L.F. (1986). Os documentos em Português da chancelaria de D. Afonso III (Edição). Unpublished Master Dissertation. Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa.Google Scholar
Fontana, J.M. (1993). Phrase structure and the syntax of clitics in the history of Spanish. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Pennsylvania. Available online at <[URL]>Google Scholar
. (1997). On the integration of second position phenomena. In A. van Kemenade & N. Vicent (Eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change (pp. 207–249). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, A. (1997). The landscape of polarity items. Groningen: Groningen dissertations in Linguistics 18.Google Scholar
Gili Gaya, S. (1950). Diego de San Pedro, Obras . Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Granberg, R.A. (1988). Object pronoun position in medieval and early modern Spanish. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Halpern, A. (1995). On the placement and morphology of clitics. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Halpern, A., & J. M. (CSLI, 1994). X0 Clitics and Xmax Clitics”. In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL XII). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Huber, J. (1986). Gramática do Português Antigo. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian (Original work published 1933)Google Scholar
Kaiser, G. (1992). Zur Grammatik der klitischen Personalpronomina im Französischen und Portugiesischen: Eine synchronische und diachronische Analyse im Rahmen der Prinzipien- und Parameter- theorie. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Universität Hamburg. Available at <[URL]>Google Scholar
. (1999). A ordem das palavras e a posição do verbo finito no português antigo. In Actas do congresso internacional organizado por motivo dos vinte anos do Português no ensino superior (pp. 248–259). Budapeste: Departamento de Língua e Literatura Portuguesas da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade Etövös Loránd.Google Scholar
Keniston, H. (1937). The syntax of Castillian prose: The sixteenth century. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kok, A. (1985). La place du pronom personnel régime conjoint en Français: Une étude diachronique. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Kroch, A. (1989). Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change, 1, 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2001). Syntactic change. In M. Baltin & C. Collins (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary syntactic theory (pp. 699–729). Oxford: Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labelle, M., & Hirschbühler, P. (2002). Changes in clausal organization and the position of clitics in Old French. Paper delivered at VII Diachronic Generative Syntax Conference, Girona.Google Scholar
Lapa, M.R. (1965). Cantigas d'escarnho e de mal dizer dos cancioneiros medievais galego-portugueses. Vigo: Galaxia.Google Scholar
Martins, A.M. (1994). Clíticos na história do Português. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa.Google Scholar
. (2001). Documentos portugueses do noroeste e da região de Lisboa: Da produção primitiva ao século XVI. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional Casa da Moeda.Google Scholar
. (2002). The loss of IP-scrambling in Portuguese: Clause structure, word order variation and change. In D. Lightfoot (Ed.), Syntactic effects of morphological change (pp. 232–248). Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2005). Clitic placement, VP-ellipsis, and scrambling in Romance. In M. Batllori, M.L. Hernanz, C. Picallo, & F. Roca (Eds.), Grammaticalization and parametric change (pp. 175–193). Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011a). Clíticos na história do português à luz do teatro vicentino. Estudos de Linguística Galega, 3, 55–83.Google Scholar
. (2011b). Scrambling and information focus in old and contemporary Portuguese. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 10, 1–26.Google Scholar
. (Forthcoming). Negation and NPI composition inside DP. In T. Biberauer & G. Walkden (Eds.), Syntax over time: Lexical, morphological and information-structural interactions. Oxford: OUP.
Menéndez-Pidal, R. (1919). Documentos lingüísticos de España (Vol. 1): Reino de Castilla. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Históricos.Google Scholar
Menéndez Pidal, R. (1980). Cantar de mio cid: Texto, gramática y vocabulario (Vol. 3). Madrid: Espasa-Calpe. (Original work published 1946)Google Scholar
Menéndez-Pidal, R. (1965). Crestomatía del Español medieval. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Menéndez Pidal, R. (1978). Primera crónica general de España, editada por Ramón Menéndez Pidal con un estudio actualizador de Diego Catalán (Vol. 1). Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, W. (1897). Zur Stellung der tonlosen Objektspronomina. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie, 21, 313–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muidine, S.A. (2000). Os pronomes i e en(de) no português dos séculos XIII a XVI. Unpublished M. A. Dissertation. Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa.Google Scholar
Mussafia, A. (1886). Una particolarità sintattica della lingua italiana dei primi secoli. In G.I. Ascoli et al. (Ed.), Miscellanea di filologia e linguistica in memoria di Napoleone Caix e ugo Angelo Canello (pp. 255–261). Firenze: LeMonnier.Google Scholar
Nieuwenhuijsen, D. (2006). Cambios en la colocación de los pronombres átonos. In C. Company Company (Ed.), Sintaxis histórica del español (pp. 1337–1404). México: UNAM & Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Nunes, J.J. (1932). Cantigas d’amor dos trovadores galego-portugueses. Lisboa: Centro do Livro Brasileiro.Google Scholar
Nunes, I.F. (Ed.). (2005). A Demanda do Santo Graal: 2ª edição revista. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional Casa da Moeda.Google Scholar
Pádua, M.P.C. (1960). A ordem das palavras no português arcaico. Coimbra: Instituto de Estudos Românicos.Google Scholar
Pato, R.A.B. (Ed.). (1884). Cartas de Afonso de Albuquerque seguidas de documentos que as elucidam (Vol. 1). Lisboa: Academia Real das Sciencias de Lisboa.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, I. (1995a ). Evidence for a verb-second phase in Old Portuguese. In A. Battye & I. Roberts (Eds.), Language change and verbal systems (pp. 110–139). Oxford: OUP.
. (1995b). A sintaxe da ordem no português arcaico: O efeito V2. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Campinas.Google Scholar
Rivero, M.L. (1986). La tipología de los pronombres átonos en el español medieval y en el español actual. Anuario de Lingüística Hispánica, 2, 197–220.Google Scholar
. (1991). Clitic and NP climbing in Old Spanish. In H. Campos & F. Martínez-Gil (Eds.), Current studies in Spanish linguistics (pp. 241–282). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
. (1997). On two locations for complement clitic pronouns: Serbo-Croatian, Bulgarian and Old Spanish. In A. van Kemenade & N. Vincent (Eds), Parameters of morphosyntactic change (pp. 170–206). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Roberts, I. (1993). A formal account of grammaticalisation in the history of Romance futures. Folia Linguistica Historica, 8(1–2), 219–258.Google Scholar
Roberts, I., & Roussou, A. (1999). Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Silva, R.V.M. (1989). Estruturas trecentistas: Elementos para uma gramática do Português arcaico. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional Casa da Moeda.Google Scholar
Teyssier, P. (1981). Le système des deíctiques spatiaux en portugais aux XIVe, XVe et XVIe siècles. Cahiers de Linguistique Hispanique Médiévale, 6, 5–39. (Reprinted from Études de Littérature et de Linguistique (pp. 161–198). Paris: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian & Centro Cultural Português. 1990.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2005). A língua de Gil Vicente. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional Casa da Moeda.Google Scholar
Tobler, A. (1875). Review of “J. Le Coultre, De L’ordre des mots dans Chrétien de Troyes”. Göttingische Gelehrte Anzeigen, Stück, 34, 1057–1082. (Reprinted from Vermischte Beiträge zur Französischen Grammatik V, 1902 & 197. Amsterdam: Rodopi.)Google Scholar
. (1889). Pronominales Objekt zu Infinitiv oder Partizipium. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 13, 186–191. (Reprinted from Vermischte Beiträge zur Französischen Grammatik II, 1902 & 1971. Amsterdam: Rodopi.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wanner, D. (1987). The development of Romance clitic pronouns: From Latin to Old Romance. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1991). The Tobler-Mussafia law in Old Spanish. In H. Campos & F. Martínez-Gil (Eds.), Current studies in Spanish linguistics (pp. 313–378). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
van der Wouden, T. (1997). Negative Contexts: Collocation, polarity and multiple negation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Nkollo, Mikolaj
2020. Cumbersome paths to indefiniteness. Evidence from an Old Occitan customary. Verba: Anuario Galego de Filoloxía 47 ► pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Nkollo, Mikołaj & Alexandra Fiéis
2020. Thenãointerpolation in Classical and early Modern European Portuguese and the mapping between syntactic and phonological structures: An empirical study. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Nkollo, Mikołaj
2019. Clitic-verb non-adjacency and the inertial theory of grammatical change: evidence from the history of European Portuguese. Lingua Posnaniensis 61:1 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.