Article published in:
Forms of Address in the Spanish of the Americas
Edited by María Irene Moyna and Susana Rivera-Mills
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 10] 2016
► pp. 171–196

¿De dónde sos?

Differences between Argentine and Salvadoran voseo to tuteo accommodation in the United States

| University of Central Arkansas
The current study investigates the address systems of Argentines and Salvadorans living in the United States in order to determine whether these voseante speakers accommodate to forms used by other Hispanic groups with whom they come into contact by shifting from voseo to tuteo. Previous research has shown a decrease from high levels of voseo among Salvadorans in El Salvador to significantly lower levels among their U.S.-based counterparts. In the current study, the same methodology has been used to study Argentine immigrants. It was hypothesized that for reasons such as national pride and socioeconomic status, the Argentines would maintain voseante forms of address at a much higher rate, something borne out by the data.
Published online: 25 August 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.10.09sor
References

References

Aizenman, N.C.
(2007, December 19). DC Area a stop in Salvadoran campaign. Washington Post, p. A15.Google Scholar
Arana, A.
(2005, May/June). How the street gangs took Central America. Foreign Affairs, 84. Retrieved from http://​foreignaffairs​.com DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker-Cristales, B.
(2004) Salvadoran migration to Southern California: Redefining el hermano lejano. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Barrancos, A.
(2008) Linguistic accommodation by Argentinean immigrants in Spain: The case of the pronoun vos and other features. Birkbeck Studies in Applied Linguistics, 3, 27-51.Google Scholar
Baumler-Schreffler, S.
(1994) Second person singular pronoun options in the speech of Salvadorans in Houston, TX. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 13(1-2), 101-119.Google Scholar
Behares, L.E.
(1981) Estudio sociodialectológico de las formas verbales de segunda persona en el español de Montevideo. In A. Elizaincín (Ed.), Estudios sobre el español del Uruguay (pp. 29-49). Montevideo: Universidad de la República, Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias.Google Scholar
Benavides, C.O.
(2003) La distribución del voseo en Hispanoamérica. Hispania, 86(3), 612-623. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, K., & Michnowicz, J.
(2010) Forms of address in Chilean Spanish. Hispania, 93(3), 413-429.Google Scholar
Chambers, J.K.
(2002) Patterns of variation including change. In J.K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), Handbook of language variation and change (pp. 349-372). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cisneros Estupiñán, M.
(1996) Aspectos histórico-pragmáticos del voseo. Boletín del Instituto Caro y Cuervo, 51(1), 27-43.Google Scholar
(1998) Hacia un estudio del voseo. Revista de la Asociación de Ex Alumnos del Seminario Andrés Bello, 7, 76-94.Google Scholar
City-Data
(2013) Top 101 cities with the most residents born in Argentina (Population 500+). Retrieved from http://​www​.city​-data​.com
Cordova, C.B.
(2005) The Salvadoran Americans. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Donni de Mirande, N.E.
(1992) El español actual hablado en la Argentina. In C.H. Alonso (Ed.), Historia y presente del español de América (pp. 383-412). Valladolid: Junta de Castilla y León.Google Scholar
Driscoll, A.
(2001, July 30). S. Florida Hispanics seek out diversity. Miami Herald. Retrieved from http://​www​.latinamericanstudies​.orgGoogle Scholar
Eckert, P.
(1997) Age as a sociolinguistic variable. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), The handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 151-167). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fontanella de Weinberg, M.B.
(1979) La oposición ‘cantes/cantés’ en el español de Buenos Aires. Thesaurus, 34, 72-83.Google Scholar
(1989) El voseo bonaerense: Visión diacrónica. Bahía Blanca, Argentina: Universidad Nacional del Sur.Google Scholar
(1992a) El español de América. Madrid: MAPFRE.Google Scholar
(1992b) Una variedad lingüística en busca de su propia identidad: el español bonaerense a lo largo del siglo XX. In M.B. Fontanella de Weinberg, P. Vallejos, & Y. Hipperdinger (Eds.), Estudios sobre el español de la Argentina (pp. 63-81). Bahía Blanca, Argentina: Departamento de Humanidades, Universidad Nacional del Sur.Google Scholar
(1993) Usos americanos y peninsulares de segunda persona singular: Siglos XVI y XVII. In L. Martínez Cuitiño & E. Lois (Eds.), Actas del III Congreso Argentino de Hispanistas: España en América y América en España (pp. 144-153). Buenos Aires: Instituto de Filología y Literaturas Hispánicas/ Facultad de Filosofía y Letras de la Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
(1999) Sistemas pronominales de tratamiento usados en el mundo hispánico. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 1401-1425). Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Giles, H.
(1973) Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics, 15, 87-105.Google Scholar
Giles, H., Taylor, D.M., & Bourhis, R.
(1973) Towards a theory of interpersonal accommodation through language use: Some Canadian data. Language in Society, 2, 177-192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giles, H., Coupland, J., & Coupland, N.
(1991) Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In H. Giles, J. Coupland, & N. Coupland (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied linguistics (pp. 1-68). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, E.
1972[1962] Schizoglossia and the linguistic norm. In A. Dil (Ed.), The ecology of language: Essays by Einar Haugen (pp. 148-158). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Heguy, S.
(2002, April 10). La crisis de miles de argentinos que viven como ilegales en Miami. Clarín. Retrieved from http://​edant​.clarin​.comGoogle Scholar
Hernández, J.E.
(2002) Accommodation in a dialect contact situation. Filología y Lingüística, 28(2), 93-110.Google Scholar
(2007)  Ella me dijo, seguí adelante, sigue estudiando: Social and semantic differentiation in casual form of address variation. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, 84(6), 703-724. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jachimowicz, M.
(2006, February 1). Argentina: A new era of migration and migration policy. Migration Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://​www​.migrationpolicy​.orgGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M., & Grinstead, J.
(2011) Variation in the tuteo and voseo negative imperatives in Argentine Spanish. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 17(2), 99-104.Google Scholar
Kapovic, M.
(2007) Fórmulas de tratamiento en dialectos de español: Fenómenos de voseo y ustedeo . Hieronymus, 1, 65-87.Google Scholar
Kany, C.E.
(1994[1945]) Sintaxis hispanoamericana (translated by Martín Blanco Álvarez). Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Kerswill, P.
(2002) Koineization and accommodation. In J.K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), Handbook of language variation and change (pp. 669-702). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Klein, N.
(2003, October 27). Miami or bust. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://​www​.theguardian​.comGoogle Scholar
Labov, W.
(1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
(1990) The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change, 2, 205-254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lapesa, R.
(1970) Las formas verbales de segunda persona y los orígenes del ‘voseo.’ In C.H. Magis (Ed.),Actas del Tercer Congreso Internacional de Hispanistas (pp. 519-531). Mexico City: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
(1980) Historia de la lengua española. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
León, A.E.
(1998) American ‘voseo’: Archaism or neologism? Lingua Americana, 2(1), 130-147.Google Scholar
Lipski, J.M.
(1988) Central American Spanish in the United States: Some Remarks on the Salvadoran Community. Aztlán, 17(2), 91-123.Google Scholar
(1994) Latin American Spanish. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
(2008) Varieties of Spanish in the United States. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Micheau, C.
(1991) The ‘Voseo’ in Latin America. In C.A. Klee & L.A. Ramos-García (Eds.), Sociolinguistics of the Spanish-speaking world: Iberia, Latin America, United States (pp. 77-91). Tempe, AR: Bilingual Press.Google Scholar
Monkman, G.
(2010) The Argentines. In J.L. Simich & T.C. Wright (Eds.), More peoples of Las Vegas: One city, many faces (pp. 149-164). Reno, NV: University of Nevada Press.Google Scholar
Ortiz, M.D.
(2000) “Voseo” in El Salvador. (Unpublished MA thesis). San Jose State University, San Jose, CA.Google Scholar
Páez Urdaneta, I.
(1981) Historia y geografía hispano-americana del voseo. Caracas: La Casa de Bello.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center
(2013, February 13). A statistical portrait of U.S. Hispanics . Retrieved from http://​www​.pewhispanic​.org
Pinkerton, A.
(1986) Observations on the tú/vos option in Guatemalan Ladino Spanish. Hispania, 69(3), 690-698. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quintanilla Aguilar, J.R.
(2009) Actitudes de los hablantes de San Salvador hacia el tuteo y el voseo. Hispania, 92(2), 361-373.Google Scholar
Real Academia Española
(2005)  Diccionario panhispánico de dudas . Retrieved from http://​www​.rae​.es​/recursos​/diccionarios​/dpd
Rebollo, L., & Moriondo, Z.
(2011) El voseo argentino y el voseo chileno: Diferencias sociolingüísticas y conversacionales a través de diálogos cinematográficos y textos en internet. In L. Rebollo & C.R. dos Santos (Eds.), Las formas de tratamiento en español y en portugués: Variación, cambio y funciones conversacionales (pp. 497-531). Niterói, Brazil: Universidade Federal Fluminense.Google Scholar
Rivera-Mills, S.V.
(2011) Use of voseo and Latino identity: An intergenerational study of Hondurans and Salvadorans in the western region of the U.S. In L.A. Ortiz-López (Ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 13th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 94-106). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, A.P.
(2009) Dividing the isthmus. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Rona, J.P.
(1967) Geografía y morfología del “voseo.” Porto Alegre: Pontífica Universidade Católica do Río Grande do Sul.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G., & Blondeau, H.
(2007) Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language, 83(3), 560-588. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinner, C.
(2010) ¿Cómo te hablé, de vos o de tú?: Uso y acomodación de las formas de tratamiento por emigrantes y turistas argentinos en España y Alemania. In M. Hummel, B. Kluge, & M.E. Vázquez Laslop (Eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico (pp. 829-856). Mexico City/Graz: El Colegio de México/Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz.Google Scholar
Siracusa, M.I.
(1972) Morfología verbal del voseo en el habla culta de Buenos Aires. Filología, 16, 201-213.Google Scholar
Sonneland, A.M.
(2001) El voseo: ¿una manera americana de hablar? Romansk Forum, 14(2), 3-8.Google Scholar
Sorenson, T.D.
(2010) Voseo to tuteo accommodation among two Salvadoran communities in the United States. (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.Google Scholar
(2013)  Voseo to tuteo accommodation among Salvadorans in the United States. Hispania, 96(4), 763-781. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, J.L.
(2007)  The sociolinguistic variables of Chilean “voseo.” (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P.
(1983) On dialect: Social and geographical perspectives. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau
(2010a)  2010 Census . Retrieved from http://​www​.census​.gov
(2010b)  The Hispanic Population: 2010 . Retrieved from http://​www​.census​.gov
Vigil, J.D.
(2002) A rainbow of gangs. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Villegas, F.
(1963) The voseo in Costa Rican Spanish. Hispania, 46(3), 612-615. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Woods, M., & Rivera-Mills, S.V.
(2010) Transnacionalismo del voseante: Salvadoreños y hondureños en los Estados Unidos. Lengua y migración, 2, 97-112.Google Scholar
(2012) El tú como un ‘mask’: Voseo and Salvadoran and Honduran Identity in the United States. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 5(1), 191-218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar