Cover not available
Part of
Forms of Address in the Spanish of the Americas
Edited by María Irene Moyna and Susana Rivera-Mills
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 10] 2016
► pp. 197–232

Use and perception of the pronominal trio vos, tú, usted in a Nicaraguan community in Miami, Florida*

| The Ohio State University
This study investigates how, in a context of dialect contact and possible shift, members of the Nicaraguan community in Miami use and talk about the 2sg pronominal trio vos, tú, usted. Through observations, a questionnaire, and audio recordings of interactions and interviews, this paper explores the patterns of personal pronoun choice, their frequency, their contexts, interlocutors’ awareness of the switch between vos and tú, and generational differences. I present evidence of participants indexing a politeness distinction that includes, at times, not two pronouns but all three. Ultimately, what is observed is a dialect leveling that may be rooted, at least partially, in one-on-one accommodation by Nicaraguans to the more unmarked Miami pronominal system of Cuban-Americans.
Published online: 25 August 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.10.10lop
References (27)
References
Benavides, C. (2003). La distribución del voseo en Hispanoamérica. Hispania, 86(3), 612-623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carricaburo, N. (1997). Las fórmulas de tratamiento en el español actual. Madrid: Arco libros.Google Scholar
Castro, A. (2000). Pronominal address in Honduran Spanish. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Christiansen, A. (2012). Creencias y actitudes lingüísticas acerca de las formas de tratamiento en Nicaragua. University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
Christiansen, A., & Chavarría Úbeda, C. (2010). Entre el habla y la escritura: un análisis de las formas de tratamiento en los anuncios comerciales en Managua, Nicaragua. Revista Cátedra, 14(1), 61-74.Google Scholar
Fontanella de Weinberg, M.B. (2004). El español de la Argentina y sus variedades regionales. Bahía Blanca: Asociación Bernardino Rivadavia.Google Scholar
Giles, H., Taylor, D.M., & Bourhis, R. (1973). Towards a theory of interpersonal accommodation through language: Some Canadian data. Language in Society, 2(2), 172-192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helmbrecht, J. (2003). Politeness distinctions in second person pronouns. In F. Lenz (Ed.), Deictic conceptualization of space, time and person (pp. 185-202). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernández, J.E. (2002). Accommodation in a dialect contact situation. Filología y Lingüística, 28(2), 93-110.Google Scholar
Johnstone, B., Andrus, J., & Danielson, A. (2006). Mobility, indexicality, and the enregisterment of ‘Pittsburghese.’ Journal of English Linguistics, 34(2), 77-104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lipski, J. (2000). The linguistic situation of Central Americans. In S.L. Mackay & S-L.C. Wong (Eds.), New immigrants in the United States (pp.189-215). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. (1994/2007). El español de América (5ª ed.). Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
. (2008). Varieties of Spanish in the United States. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Moser, K. (2006). La variación entre formas ustedeantes y voseantes a nivel del discurso familiar en la clase media y alta de San José Costa Rica: ¿una estrategia de cortesía? In M. Schrader-Kniffki (Ed.), La cortesía en el mundo hispánico: Nuevos contextos, nuevos enfoques metodológicos (pp. 97-116). Frankfurt am Main/ Madrid: Vervuert/ Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
. (2008). Tres hipótesis acerca de la (des)cortesía en el tratamiento diádico informal-familiar de San José, Costa Rica. In M. Perl, M. Portilla Chaves, & V. Sánchez Corrales (Eds.), Estudios sobre el español centroamericano. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana VI (1) (pp.129-148). Frankfurt am Main/ Madrid: Vervuert/ Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
. (2010). Las formas de tratamiento verbales-pronominales en Guatemala, El Salvador, Panamá (y Costa Rica): Hacia una nueva sistematización en la periferia centroamericana. In M. Hummel, B. Kluge, & M.E Vázquez Laslop (Eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico (pp. 271-291). Mexico City/Graz: El Colegio de México/Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz.Google Scholar
Morford, J. (1997). Social indexicality in French pronominal address. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 7(1), 3-37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parodi, C. (2003). Contacto de dialectos del español en Los Ángeles. In G. Perissinotto (Ed.), Ensayos de lengua y pedagogía (pp. 23-38). Santa Barbara, CA: University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute.Google Scholar
Quesada Pacheco, M.A. (1996). El español de América Central. In M. Alvar (Ed.), Manual de dialectología hispánica. El Español de América (pp. 101-115). Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Raymond, C.W. (2012). Reallocation of pronouns through contact: In-the-moment identity construction amongst Southern California Salvadorans. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 16(5), 669-690. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rey, A. (1997). Social correlates of the voseo in Managua, Nicaragua: Workplace, street and party domains. Hispanic Journal, 18, 109-126.Google Scholar
Rivera-Mills, S.V. (2011). Use of voseo and Latino identity: An intergenerational study of Hondurans and Salvadorans in the western region. In L.A. Ortiz-López (Ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 13th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 94-196). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialects of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication, 23, 193-229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorenson, T.D. (2013). Voseo to tuteo accommodation among Salvadorans in the United States. Hispania, 96(4), 763-781. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thiemer, E. (1989). El voseo ante la polémica y la práctica. A propósito de algunos datos recogidos en Nicaragua. In P. Peira, P. Jauralde, J. Sánchez, & J. Urrutia (Eds.), Homenaje a Alonso Zamora Vicente (pp. 229-306). Madrid: Castalia.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). U.S. Census. The Hispanic Population: 2010 . Web. Sept 15. <[URL]>
Zurer Pearson, B., & McGee, A. (1993). Language choice in Hispanic-background junior high school students in Miami: A 1988 update. In A. Roca & J. Lipski (Eds.), Spanish in the United States: Linguistic contact and diversity (pp. 91-102). The Hague: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Guarin, Daniel & Larissa Oliveira Cardoso
2023. A Virtual Linguistic Landscape Analysis of Higher Education Institutions and Their Use of Pronouns of Address in the Hispanic and Lusophone World. In Transformation of Higher Education Through Institutional Online Spaces [Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Fernández-Mallat, Víctor & Michael Newman
2022. Continuity and Change in New Dialect Formation: Tú vs. Usted in New York City Spanish. Journal of Language Contact 15:1 ► pp. 240 ff. DOI logo
Guarin, Daniel
2022. El uso de pronombres de tratamiento en el departamento del Quindío (Colombia). Miradas 17:2 ► pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Guarin, Daniel
2024. Pronominal address in the linguistic landscape of Hispanic Philadelphia. Language, Culture and Society DOI logo
Restrepo-Ramos, Falcon & Nofiya Denbaum-Restrepo
2022. The Syntactic and Discourse Properties of Second Person Singular Forms of Address inPaisaSpanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 15:2 ► pp. 453 ff. DOI logo
López Alonzo, Karen
2021. Chapter 1. Between vos and usted. In Aspects of Latin American Spanish Dialectology [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 32], ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Restrepo-Ramos, Falcon D.
2021. Chapter 2. A changing landscape of voseo in Medellín?. In Linguistic Landscape in the Spanish-speaking World [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 35], ► pp. 45 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.