Article published in:Inquiries in Hispanic Linguistics: From theory to empirical evidence
Edited by Alejandro Cuza, Lori Czerwionka and Daniel Olson
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 12] 2016
► pp. 39–52
On the grammaticality of recomplementation in Spanish
In English, an overt secondary complementizer has been described as a grammatical violation, a claim that cannot be corroborated for Spanish. The present study fills this gap in the literature by asking whether the overt variety is associated with a decrement in acceptability judgment when compared to the null variety. Results from a speeded aural acceptability judgment task suggest that there is indeed a significant decrement in acceptability rating. This finding is robust across both statement and question constructions. A processing-based account is offered in order to unify results from both Spanish and English. Importantly, given that the native Spanish speakers do not fully reject the overt variety, the proposed account is meant to complement rather than to replace existing grammar-based accounts.
Published online: 01 November 2016
Casasanto, L., & Sag, I
(2008) The advantage of the ungrammatical. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society , Austin, TX.
Cuza, A., & Frank, J
Demonte V., & Fernández-Soriano O
Demonte, V., & Fernández-Soriano, O
Ferreira, F., Lau, E.F., & Bailey, K.G
Flege, J.E., MacKay, I.R., & Piske, T
González i Planas, F
MacIntyre, P.D., Noels, K.A., & Clément, R
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.