Part of
Inquiries in Hispanic Linguistics: From theory to empirical evidenceEdited by Alejandro Cuza, Lori Czerwionka and Daniel Olson
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 12] 2016
► pp. 73–94
Edited by Alejandro Cuza, Lori Czerwionka and Daniel Olson
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 12] 2016
► pp. 73–94
Exploring the syntax-semantics-prosody interface
Complement clauses in conversation
This variationist study examines finite clausal complementation with respect to the prosodic integration of matrix clauses (MC) and complement clauses (CC). In both Spanish and English conversational data, MCs and CCs are found to occur in a single prosodic unit, or Intonation Unit (IU), over two-thirds of the time. The presence of syntactic material (e.g., adverbs) intervening between MC verb and CC (and complementizer that, in English) favors CC occurrence in a different IU. A contrary effect, favoring CC occurrence on the same IU, is that of first person MC subjects, which may form part of formulaic expressions. These discourse-cognitive constraints provide cross-linguistic evidence for the interaction of syntax with prosody in speech.
Keywords: Complement clauses, Corpus linguistics, Prosody and syntax, Variation
References (25)
Chafe, W. (1987). Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R.S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp. 1–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 
Croft, W. (1995). Intonation units and grammatical structure. Linguistics, 33(5), 839–882.
. (2007). Intonation units and grammatical structure in Wardaman and in cross-linguistic perspective. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 27(1), 1–39.
Du Bois, J.W., S. Schuetze-Coburn, S., Cumming, S., & Paolino, D. (1993). Outline of discourse transcription. In J. Edwards & M. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse (pp. 45–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Du Bois, J.W., Chafe, W.L., Meyer, C., Thompson, S.A., Englebretson, R., & Martey, N. (2000-2005). Santa Barbara corpus of spoken American English (Files 1–30). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
Givón, T. (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study (Vol. 3). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2001). Verbal complements and clause union. In Syntax. An introduction (Vol. 2, pp. 39–89). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
. (1987). Quantitative analysis of linguistic variation. In U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, K. Mattheier, & P. Trudgill (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society (pp. 6–21). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Myhill, J. (2005). Quantitative methods of discourse analysis. In R. Kohler, G. Altmann, & R.G. Piotrowski (Eds.), Quantitative linguistics: An international handbook (pp. 471–497). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Noonan, M. (2007). Complementation. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (2nd ed.; pp. 53–150). Cambridge: CUP.
Ono, T., & Thompson, S.A. (1995). What can conversation tell us about syntax? In P.W. Davis (Ed.), Alternative linguistics: Descriptive and theoretical modes (pp. 213–271). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pešková, A. (2013). Experimenting with pro-drop in Spanish. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 26, 117–149.
Poplack, S., & Tagliamonte, S.A. (2001). African American English in the diaspora: tense and aspect. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Sánchez-Ayala, I. (2001). Prosodic integration in Spanish complement constructions. In A.J. Cienki, B.J. Luka, & M.B. Smith (Eds.), Conceptual and discourse factors in linguistic structure (pp. 201–213). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Sankoff, D. (1988). Sociolinguistics and syntactic variation. In F.J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey (Vol. 4: pp. 140–161). Cambridge: CUP.
Sankoff, D., Tagliamonte, S.A., & Smith, E. (2005). Goldvarb X: A variable rule application for Macintosh and Windows. Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.
Thompson, S. (2002). ‘Object complements’ and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language, 26(1), 125–164.
Torres Cacoullos, R., & Walker, J.A. (2009). On the persistence of grammar in discourse formulas: A variationist study of that. Linguistics, 47(1), 1–43.
. (2011). Collocations in grammaticalization and variation. In H. Narrog & B. Heine (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 225–238). Oxford: OUP.
Travis, C.E. (2005). Discourse markers in Colombian Spanish: A study in polysemy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Travis, C.E., & Torres Cacoullos, R. (2012). 30 Discourse syntax. In J.I. Hualde, A. Olarrera & E. O’Rourke (Eds.), The handbook of Hispanic linguistics (pp. 653–672). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
. (2014). Stress on I: Debunking unitary contrast accounts. Studies in Language, 38(2), 360–392.
van der Houwen, F. (1998). Organizing discourse. Direct and indirect speech in Mexican Spanish. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 15, 123–134.
Yoon, J., & Wulff, S. (to appear). A Corpus-based Study of Infinitival and Sentential Complement Constructions in Spanish. In J. Yoon & S.T. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to Construction Grammar (pp. 145–164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Beatty-Martínez, Anne L., Christian A. Navarro-Torres & Paola E. Dussias
2020. Codeswitching: A Bilingual Toolkit for Opportunistic Speech Planning. Frontiers in Psychology 11 
Torres Cacoullos, Rena
2020. Code-Switching Strategies: Prosody and Syntax. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Steuck, Jonathan & Rena Torres Cacoullos
2019. Chapter 14. Complementing in another language. In Language Variation - European Perspectives VII [Studies in Language Variation, 22], ► pp. 218 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.