Cover not available
Part of
Complement Clauses in Portuguese: Syntax and acquisition
Edited by Ana Lúcia Santos and Anabela Gonçalves
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 17] 2018
► pp. 1–26

Complement clauses in Portuguese

Some facts and open questions

| University of Lisbon
| University of Lisbon
Article outline
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.17.01gon
References (98)
References
Agostinho, C. (2014). The acquisition of control in European Portuguese complement clauses (Unpublished MA dissertation). University of Lisbon.
Ambar, M. (1992). Temps et structure de la phrase en portugais. In H. Obenhauer & A. Zribi-Hertz (Eds.), Structure de la phrase et théorie du liage (pp. 29–49). Saint-Denis: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar
(2007). Verb movement and tense – EPP and T-completeness. In M. C. Picchi & A. Pona (Eds.), Proceedings of the XXXII Incontro di Grammatica Generativa (pp. 1–20). Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Avrutin, S., & Wexler, K. (2000). Children’s knowledge of subjunctive clauses: Obviation, binding, and reference. Language Acquisition, 8(1), 69–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, P. (1995). Null subjects (Unpublished PhD dissertation). MIT.
(2013). Subordinação argumental finita. In E. Raposo, M. F. Bacelar do Nascimento, M. A. Mota, L. Segura, & A. Mendes (Eds.), Gramática do português (pp. 1821–1897). Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.Google Scholar
Barbosa, P., & Raposo, E. (2013). Subordinação argumental infinitiva. In E. Raposo, M. F. Bacelar do Nascimento, M. A. Mota, L. Segura, & A. Mendes (Eds.), Gramática do português (pp. 1901–1977). Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.Google Scholar
Becker, M. (2005). Raising, control and the subset principle. In J. Alderete, C. Han, & A. Kochetov (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 52–60). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Belletti, A. (2005). Extended doubling on the VP periphery. Probus, 17, 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blake, R. (1983). Mood selection among Spanish speaking children, ages 4 to 12. The Bilingual Review, 10, 21–32.Google Scholar
Boeckx, C., & Hornstein, N. (2003). Reply to ‘Control is not movement’. Linguistic Inquiry, 34, 269–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Movement under control. Linguistic Inquiry, 35, 431–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeckx C., Hornstein, N., & Nunes, J. (2010). Control as movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, H., & Wexler, K. (1987). The maturation of syntax. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (Eds.), Parameter setting (pp. 123–172). Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., & Terrell, T. D. (1990). Análisis semántico del modo en español. In I. Bosque (Ed.), Indicativo y subjuntivo (pp. 145–163). Madrid: Taurus Universitaria.Google Scholar
Chomsky, C. (1969). The acquisition of syntax in children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
(1986). Knowledge of language – Its nature, origin and use. New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (2006). Restructuring and functional heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Costa, J. (2011). Topic prominence is not a factor of variation between Brazilian and European Portuguese. In J. Berns, H. Jacobs, & T. Scheer (Eds.), Romance Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2009 (pp. 71–88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, J., & Rooryck, J. (1995). On pseudo-raising in English and Portuguese. In L. Nash (Ed.), Proceedings of Langue et Grammaire 2 (pp. 48–58). Paris: Université Paris VII.Google Scholar
Culicover, P., & Jackendoff, R. (2001). Control is not movement. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 493–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cunha, C., & Cintra, L. F. L. (1984). Nova gramática do português contemporâneo. Lisboa: Sá da Costa.Google Scholar
Cyrino, S. (2010). On Romance syntactic complex predicates: Why Brazilian Portuguese is different. Estudos da Língua(gem), 8, 187–222.Google Scholar
Declerck, R. (1991). Tense in English: Its structure and use in discourse. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duarte, I. (1993). Complementos infinitivos preposicionados e outras construções temporalmente defectivas em português europeu. Actas do VIII Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística (pp. 145–158). Lisboa: APL.Google Scholar
Duarte, I., & Figueiredo Silva, M. C. (2016). The null subject parameter and the structure of the sentence in European and Brazilian Portuguese. In L. Wetzels, S. Menuzzi, & J. Costa (Eds.), The handbook of Portuguese linguistics (pp. 234–253). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duarte, I., Gonçalves, A., Miguel, M., & Mota, M. A. (1999). ‘Não cheguei de aprender nada’. Áreas de variação e tendências de mudança em português de Moçambique. In A. C. Macário Lopes & C. Martins (Eds.), Actas do XIV Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística (Vol. I, pp. 477–493). Braga: APL.Google Scholar
Duarte, I., Santos, A. L., & Gonçalves, A. (2016). O infinitivo flexionado na gramática do adulto e na aquisição de L1. In A. M. Martins & E. Carrilho (Eds.), Manual de linguística portuguesa (pp. 453–480). Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Espada, C. (2008). Indicativo e conjuntivo em completivas objecto. Contributos didácticos para o ensino do português como língua materna (Unpublished MA dissertation). University of Lisbon.
Fernández-Salgueiro, G. (2005). Agree, the EPP-F and further-raising in Spanish. In R. S. Gess & E. J. Rubin (Eds.), Theoretical and experimental approaches to Romance linguistics. Selected papers from the 34th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (pp. 97–107). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ferreira, M. (2004). Hyperraising and null subjects in Brazilian Portuguese. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 47: Collected papers on Romance syntax (pp. 57–85). Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Figueiredo Silva, M. C. (1996). A posição sujeito em português brasileiro. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
Flores, C., Santos, A. L., Jesus, A., & Marques, R. (2016). Age and input effects in the acquisition of mood in Heritage Portuguese. Journal of Child Language. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, A. (1998). Polarity sensitivity as (non)veridical dependency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, A., Cunha, L. F., & Silvano, P. (2010). Interpretação temporal dos domínios infinitivos na construção de reestruturação do português europeu. In A. Brito, J. Veloso, & A. Fiéis (Eds.), Textos seleccionados do XXV Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística (pp. 435–447). Porto: APL.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, A., Santos, A. L., & Duarte, I. (2014). (Pseudo-)Inflected infinitives and control as Agree . In K. Lahousse & S. Marzo (Eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2012 (pp. 161–180). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, P., & Maciel, C. (1998). Estruturas de subordinação na aquisição do português/língua segunda. In P. Gonçalves (Ed.), Mudanças do português em Moçambique: Aquisição e formato de estruturas de subordinação (pp. 5–66). Maputo: UEM, Livraria Universitária.Google Scholar
Goodluck, H., Terzi, A., & Díaz, G. C. (2001). The acquisition of control crosslinguistically: Structural and lexical factors in learning to license PRO. Journal of Child Language, 28(1), 153–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grano, T. A. (2012). Control and restructuring at the syntax-semantics interface (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Chicago.
Grevisse, M. (1953). Le bon usage. Grammaire française avec des remarques sur la langue française d'aujourd'hui (5th ed.). Paris: Duculot.Google Scholar
Hirsch, C., Orfitelli, R., & Wexler, K. (2008). The acquisition of raising reconsidered. In A. Gavarró & M. João Freitas (Eds.), Proceedings of the conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition (pp. 253–262). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Hirsch, C., & Wexler, K. (2007). The late development of raising: What children seem to think about seem. In S. Dubinsky & B. Davies (Eds.), New horizons in the analysis of control and raising (pp. 35–70). New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hooper, J. B. (1975). On assertive predicates. In J. P. Kimball (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 4 (pp. 91–124). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hornstein, N. (1999). Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry, 30, 69–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). Move! A minimalist theory of construal. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Issak, A. (1998). Estruturas de complementação verbal do português de Moçambique. In P. Gonçalves (Ed.), Mudanças do português em Moçambique: Aquisição e formato de estruturas de subordinação (pp. 67–110). Maputo: UEM, Livraria Universitária.Google Scholar
Jesus, A. (2014). Aquisição do modo em orações completivas do Português Europeu (Unpublished MA dissertation). University of Lisbon.
Jones, M. A. (1993). Sardinian syntax. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kempchinsky, P. (1990). Más sobre el efecto de referencia disjunta del subjuntivo. In I. Bosque (Ed.), Indicativo y subjuntivo. Madrid: Taurus Universitaria.Google Scholar
Kirby, S. (2011). Move Over, Control freaks: Syntactic raising as a cognitive default. In N. Danis, K. Mesh, & H. Sung (Eds.), Boston University Conference on Language Development 35 – Online proceedings supplement. Available at <[URL]>Google Scholar
Landau, I. (2000). Elements of control: Structure and meaning in infinitival constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22, 811–877. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Control in generative grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). A two-tiered theory of control. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landau, I., & Thornton, R. (2011). Early child control. Lingua, 121(5), 920–941. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Limber, J. (1973). The genesis of complex sentences. In T. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 169–186). New York, NY: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luján, M. (1993). La subida de clíticos y el modo en los complementos verbales del español. In O. Fernández-Soriano (Ed.), Los pronombres átonos (pp. 235–283). Madrid: Taurus Universitária.Google Scholar
Madeira, A. M. (1994). On the Portuguese inflected infinitive. In J. Harris (Ed.), UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 6, 179–203.Google Scholar
Marques, R. (1995). Sobre o valor dos modos conjuntivo e indicativo em português (Unpublished MA dissertation). University of Lisbon.
(2013). Modo. In E. P. Raposo, M. F. Bacelar do Nascimento, M. A. Mota, L. Segura, & A. Mendes (Eds.), Gramática do português (pp. 673–693). Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.Google Scholar
(2014). Référence au réel et concordance des temps en porugais européen. Travaux Linguistiques du Cerlico, 27, 31–46.Google Scholar
(2016). O modo conjuntivo. In A. M. Martins & E. Carrilho (Eds.), Manual de linguística portuguesa (pp. 610–635). Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marques, R., Silvano, P., Gonçalves, A., & Santos, A. L. (2015). Sequence of tenses in complementation structures: Lexical restrictions and effects on language acquisition. In R. Klassen, J. M. Liceras, & E. Valenzuela (Eds.), Hispanic linguistics at the crossroads. Theoretical linguistics, language acquisition and language contact (pp. 69–88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Martins, A. M. (2006). Aspects of infinitival constructions in the history of Portuguese. In R. Gess & D. Arteaga (Eds.), Historical Romance linguistics: Retrospective and perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martins, A. M., & Nunes, J. (2005). Raising issues in Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 4, 53–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Syntactic change as chain reaction: The emergence of hyper-raising in Brazilian Portuguese. In P. Crisma & G. Longobardi (Eds.), Historical syntax and linguistic theory (pp. 144–157). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Apparent hyper-raising in Brazilian Portuguese: Agreement with topics across a finite CP. In P. E. Panagiotidis (Ed.), The complementiser phase: Subjects and operators (pp. 142–163). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meireles, J., & Raposo, E. (1983). Subjunctives and disjoint reference in Portuguese: Some implications for the Binding Theory. Paper presented at Colloqui Internacional de Linguistica Teorica i Llengues Romaniques. Barcelona.
Mensching, G. (2000). Infinitive constructions with specified subjects. A syntactic analysis of the Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Modesto, M. (2010). What Brazilian Portuguese says about control: Remarks on Boeckx and Hornstein. Syntax, 13, 78–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Infinitivos flexionados em português brasileiro e sua relevância para a teoria do controle. In D. da Hora & E. Negrão (Eds.), Estudos da linguagem, casamento entre temas e perspectivas (pp. 63–87). João Pessoa: Idéia.Google Scholar
Nunes, J. (2008). Inherent Case as a licensing condition for A-movement: The case of hyper‑raising constructions in Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 7, 83–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Subject and topic hyper-raising in Brazilian Portuguese: A case study on reference sets for economy computations. In M. A. Kato & F. Ordoñez (Eds.), The morphosyntax of Portuguese and Spanish in Latin America (pp. 107–134). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, F. (2003). Modalidade e modo. In M. H. M. Mateus, A. M. Brito, I. Duarte, & I. H. Faria (Eds.), Gramática da língua portuguesa (pp. 243–272). Lisboa: Caminho.Google Scholar
Orfitelli, R. (2012). Argument intervention in the acquisition of A-movement (Unpublished MA dissertation). UCLA.
Padilla, F. R. (1990). On the definition of binding domains in Spanish. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Picallo, C. (1984). The Infl node and the null subject parameter. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 75–102.Google Scholar
Pires, A., & Rothman, J. (2009). Acquisition of Brazilian Portuguese in late childhood: Implications for syntactic theory and language change. In A. Pires & J. Rothman (Eds.), Minimalist inquiries into child and adult language acquisition: Case studies across Portuguese (pp. 129–154). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pires, A., Rothman, J., & Santos, A. L. (2011). L1 Acquisition of interface properties across Portuguese dialects: Modular and interdisciplinary interfaces as sources of explanation. Lingua, 121(4), 605–622. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raposo, E. (1985). Some asymmetries in the Binding Theory in Romance. The Linguistic Review, 5, 75–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1987). Case Theory and Infl-to-Comp: The inflected infinitive in European Portuguese. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 85–109.Google Scholar
Rigau, G. (1987). Sobre el carácter quantificador de los pronombres tónicos en Catalán. In V. Demonte & M. Fernández Lagunilla (Eds.), Sintaxis de las lenguas Románicas (pp. 390–407). Madrid: Textos Universitarios.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, C. (2002). Morphology and null subjects in Brazilian Portuguese. In D. Lightfoot (Ed.), Syntactic effects of morphological change (pp. 160–178). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Impoverished morphology and A-movement out of case domains (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Maryland at College Park.
Rodrigues, C., & Hornstein, N. (2013). Epicene agreement and inflected infinitives when the data is “Under Control”: A reply to Modesto (2010). Syntax, 16, 292–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rooryck, J. (2000). Configurations of sentential complementation: Perspectives from Romance languages. New York, NY: Routledge.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., Duarte, I., Pires, A., & Santos, A. L. (2013). How early after all?: Inflected infinitives in European and Brazilian Portuguese L1 production. In S. Stavrakaki, M. Lalioti, & P. Konstatinopoulou (Eds.), Advances in language acquisition (pp. 164–172). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Santos, A. L., Génereux, M., Cardoso, A., Agostinho, C., & Abalada, S. (2014). A corpus of European Portuguese child and child-directed speech. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, H. Loftsson, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, A. Moreno, J. Odijk, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), LREC 2014 Proceedings. European Language Resources Association (ELRA). Available at <[URL]>Google Scholar
Santos, A. L., Gonçalves, A., & Hyams, N. (2016). Aspects of the acquisition of object control and ECM-type verbs in European Portuguese. Language Acquisition, 23, 199–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santos, A. L., Rothman, J., Pires, A., & Duarte, I. (2013). Early or late acquisition of inflected infinitives in European Portuguese?: Evidence from spontaneous production data. In M. Becker, J. Grinstead, & J. Rothman (Eds.), Generative linguistics and acquisition: Studies in honor of Nina M. Hyams (pp. 65–88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, M. (2012). A New take on partial control: Defective thematic intervention. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 6, 1–47.Google Scholar
(2014). Partial control in Romance languages: The covert comitative analysis. In K. Lahousse & S. Marzo (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory (pp. 181–198). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silvano, P. (2002). Sobre a semântica da sequência de tempos em português europeu. Análise das relações temporais em frases complexas com completivas (Unpublished MA dissertation). Universidade do Minho, Portugal.
Szabolcsi, A. (2009). Overt nominative subjects in infinitival complements cross-linguistically. NYU Working Papers in Linguistics, 2, 1–55.Google Scholar
Torrego, E. (1996). On quantifier float in control clauses. Linguistic Inquiry, 27, 111–126.Google Scholar
Ura, H. (1994). Varieties of raising and the feature-based bare phrase structure theory. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 7.Google Scholar