Chapter published in:
Complement Clauses in Portuguese: Syntax and acquisition
Edited by Ana Lúcia Santos and Anabela Gonçalves
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 17] 2018
► pp. 2758
Ambar, M.
(1994) ‘Aux-to-Comp’ and lexical restrictions on verb movement. In G. Cinque, J. Koster, J.-Y. Pollock, L. Rizzi, & R. Zanuttini (Eds.), Paths towards universal grammar (pp. 1–24). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Andersson, L-G.
(1975) Form and function of subordinate clauses (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Gothenburg University.
Andrews, A. D.
(1971) Case agreement of predicate modifiers in Ancient Greek. Linguistic Inquiry, 2, 127–151.Google Scholar
(1976) The VP-complement analysis in Modern Icelandic. In J. Maling & A. Zaenen (Eds.), NELS 6 – Proceedings of the 6th meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society (pp. 1–21). Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Baker, M. C.
(1988) Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1997) Thematic roles and syntactic structure. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar (pp. 73–137). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, P.
(2009) A case for an Agree-based theory of control. 11th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar Proceedings , 101–123. Available at http://​ling​.auf​.net​/lingbuzz​/000911
Bobaljik, J., & Landau, I.
(2009) Icelandic Control is not A-movement: The case from Case. Linguistic Inquiry, 40, 113–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, C., & Hornstein, N.
(2004) Movement under Control. Linguistic Inquiry, 35, 431–452. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) The virtues of Control as movement. Syntax, 9, 118–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, C., Hornstein, N., & Nunes, J.
(2010) Control as movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, D.
(1984) On the content of empty categories. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1981) Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
(2000) Minimalist inquiries. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2001) Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 28–53). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, G.
(2006) Restructuring and functional heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Constantini, F.
(2005) Subjunctive obviation: An interface perspective (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia.
Fiéis, A., & Madeira, A.
(2012) Predicados de controlo na diacronia do português. In A. Costa, C. Flores, & N. Alexandre (Eds.), Textos selecionados do XXVII Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística (pp. 271–284). Lisboa: Associação Portuguesa de Linguística.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, A., Santos, A. L., & Duarte, I.
(2014) (Pseudo-)Inflected infinitives and Control as Agree. In K. Lahousse & S. Marzo (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory (pp. 161–180). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grano, T.
(2012) Control and restructuring at the syntax-semantics interface (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Chicago.
Hornstein, N.
(1999) Movement and Control. Linguistic Inquiry, 30, 69–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kempchinsky, P.
(2009) What can the subjunctive disjoint reference effect tell us about the subjunctive. Lingua, 119, 1788–1810. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landau, I.
(2000) Elements of control: Structure and meaning in infinitival constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) The scale of finiteness and the calculus of Control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22, 811–877. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Two routes of control: Evidence from case transmission in Russian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 26, 877–924. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Control in generative grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016). Agreement at PF: An argument from partial control. Syntax, 19, 79–109.Crossref
Ledgeway, A.
(1998) Variation in the Romance infinitive: The case of the Southern Calabrian inflected infinitive. Transactions of the Philological Society Volume, 96(1), 1–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luján, M.
(1978) Clitic promotion and mood in Spanish verbal complements. Montreal Working Papers in Linguistics, 10, 103–190.Google Scholar
Madeira, A.
(1994) On the Portuguese inflected infinitive. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 6, 179–203.Google Scholar
Martins, A. M.
(2000) A minimalist approach to clitic climbing. In J. Costa (Ed.), Portuguese syntax (pp. 169–190). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maurer Júnior, T. H.
(1968) O infinito flexionado português. São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional.Google Scholar
McFadden, T., & Sundaresan, S.
(2014) Finiteness in South Asian languages: An introduction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 32, 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Modesto, M.
(2010) What Brazilian Portuguese says about Control: Remarks on Boeckx & Hornstein. Syntax, 13, 78–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Picallo, C.
(1985) Opaque domains (Unpublished PhD dissertation). City University of New York.
Pires, A.
(2006) The minimalist syntax of defective domains: Gerunds and infinitives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, L.
(2008) Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quicoli, A. C.
(1996) Inflection and parametric variation: Portuguese vs. Spanish. In R. Freidin (Ed.), Current issues in comparative grammar (pp. 46–80). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rabelo, P. C.
(2010) Argumentos nulos no português do Brasil em contextos oracionais finitos e infinitivos (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Universidade de Brasília.
Raposo, E.
(1985) Some asymmetries in the Binding Theory in Romance. The Linguistic Review, 5, 75–110.Google Scholar
(1987) Case Theory and Infl-to-Comp: The inflected infinitive in European Portuguese. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 85–109.Google Scholar
(1989) Prepositional infinitival constructions in European Portuguese. In O. Jaeggli & K. Safir (Eds.), The null subject parameter (pp. 277–305). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rigau, G.
(1995) Temporal infinitive constructions in Catalan and Spanish. Probus, 7, 279–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L.
(1982) Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, C.
(2007) Agreement and flotation in partial and inverse partial Control configurations. In W. D. Davies & S. Dubinsky (Eds.), New horizons in the analysis of control and raising (pp. 213–229). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, C., & Hornstein, N.
(2013) Epicene agreement and inflected infinitives when the data is “under control”: A reply to Modesto (2010). Syntax, 16(3), 292–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schlenker, P.
(2005) The Lazy Frenchman’s approach to the subjunctive (speculations on reference to worlds, presuppositions, and semantic defaults in the analysis of mood). In T. Geerts, I. van Ginneken, & H. Jacobs (Eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003 (pp. 269–309). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scida, E.
(2004) The inflected infinitive in Romance languages. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sheehan, M.
(2012) A new take on partial control: Defective thematic intervention. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 6, 1–47.Google Scholar
(2014a) Partial Control in Romance Languages: The covert comitative analysis. In K. Lahousse & S. Marzo (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory (pp. 181–198). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2014b). Portuguese, Russian and the theory of control. In H. Huang, E. Poole, & A. Rysling (Eds.), Proceedings of the 43rd annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society 43 (NELS 43) (Vol. 2, pp. 115–126). Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, H.
(2008) The case of PRO. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 26, 403–450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sitaridou, I.
(2002) The synchrony and diachrony of Romance infinitives with nominative subjects (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Manchester.
(2007) Romance infinitives with subjects, subjunctive obviation and Control Theory. In L. Eguren & O. Fernández Soriano (Eds.), Coreference, modality, and focus: Studies on the syntax-semantics interface (pp. 191–236). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sundaresan, S.
(2014) Making sense of silence: Finiteness and the (OC) pro vs. pro distinction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 32(1), 59–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sundaresan, S., & McFadden, T.
(2009) Subject distribution in Tamil and other languages: Selection vs. case. Journal of South Asian Linguistics, 2(1), 5–34.Google Scholar
Suñer, M.
(1980) Clitic promotion in Spanish revisited. In F. Neussel (Ed.), Contemporary studies in Romance languages (pp. 300–330). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
(1986) On the referential properties of embedded finite clause subjects. In I. Bordelois, H. Contreras, & K. Zagona (Eds.), Generative studies in Spanish syntax (pp. 183–196). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, A.
(2009) Overt nominative subjects in infinitival complements cross-linguistically: Data, diagnostics, and preliminary analyses. NYU Working Papers in Linguistics, 2, 1–54.Google Scholar
Torrego, E.
(1998) Nominative subjects and pro-drop INFL. Syntax, 1(2), 206–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsoulas, G.
(1996) The nature of the subjunctive and the formal grammar of obviation. In K. Zagona (Ed.), Grammatical theory and Romance languages (pp. 293–306). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Urk, C.
(2010) On obligatory control: A movement and PRO approach (Unpublished manuscript). MIT.
Williams, E.
(1980) Predication. Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 203–238.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Barbosa, Pilar P.
2021.  In Non-canonical Control in a Cross-linguistic Perspective [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 270],  pp. 35 ff. Crossref logo
Ledgeway, Adam
2021.  In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 355],  pp. 206 ff. Crossref logo
Rivas, Javier & Esther L. Brown
2021. O infinitivo flexionado en galego: unha análise variacionista baseada na lingua oral. Estudos de Lingüística Galega  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Santos, Ana Lúcia
2021.  In L1 Acquisition and L2 Learning [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 65],  pp. 84 ff. Crossref logo
Sheehan, Michelle, Jeffrey Blokzijl & M. Carmen Parafita Couto
2020.  In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 16 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 16],  pp. 260 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.