Cover not available
Part of
Complement Clauses in Portuguese: Syntax and acquisition
Edited by Ana Lúcia Santos and Anabela Gonçalves
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 17] 2018
► pp. 59–100

Inflected infinitives in Brazilian Portuguese and the theory of Control

| University of São Paulo
In this chapter, we describe the distribution of inflected infinitives in Brazilian Portuguese (BP); discuss the possible interpretations of their subjects when null and address the debate between Modesto (2010) and proponents of the movement theory of Control (MTC, particularly Boeckx & Hornstein, 2006; Rodrigues & Hornstein, 2013) as to whether inflected infinitives constitute a serious argument against the MTC. Data were experimentally tested using a grammaticality judgment task, presented here. Results indicate that inflected infinitives are perfectly grammatical in obligatory Control contexts for BP speakers; but its grammaticality is uncertain in non-control contexts, supporting Modesto’s claims.
Keywords: minimalism, inflected infinitives, Brazilian Portuguese, Movement theory of Control, Two-tiered Theory
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.BP inflection and pro-drop
  • 3. Rodrigues and Hornstein (2013)
    • 3.1The experiment
    • 3.2Partial Control structures
      • 3.2.1The complex DP analysis
      • 3.2.2Inflected infinitives are controlled, null finite subjects are not
    • 3.3BP has nonfinite inflected clauses
    • 3.4Epicene agreement and null finite subjects in Brazilian Portuguese
  • 4.The distribution of inflected infinitives in BP
  • 5.Making sense of the data
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.17.03mod
References (97)
References
Barbosa, P. (2009). A case for an Agree-based Theory of Control (Unpublished manuscript). Universidade do Minho, CEHUM.
(2013). Pro as a Minimal NP: Towards a unified approach to pro-drop (Unpublished manuscript). Retrieved from <[URL]>
Barrie, M., & Pittman, C. M. (2004). Partial Control and the movement towards Movement. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 22, 75–92.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, D., & Landau, I. (2009). Icelandic Control is not A-Movement: The case from Case. Linguistic Inquiry, 40, 113–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, C., & Hornstein, N. (2004). Movement under control. Linguistic Inquiry, 35, 431–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). The virtues of control as movement. Syntax, 9, 118–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, C., Hornstein, N., & Nunes, J. (2010). Control as movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, H. (1989). Anaphoric AGR. In O. Jaeggli & K. Safir (Eds.), The null subject parameter (pp. 69–109). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, D. (1985). PRO, pronominal or anaphor. Linguistic Inquiry, 16, 471–477.Google Scholar
Bowers, J. (2008). On reducing Control to Movement. Syntax, 11, 125–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canever, F. (2013). Brazilian Portuguese inflected infinitives and the dynamic nature of language (Unpublished manuscript). University of São Paulo.
Chierchia, G. (1989). Anaphora and attitudes de se. In R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, & P. van Emde Boas (Eds.), Semantics and contextual expression (pp. 1–31). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2001). Derivation by Phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2008). On phases. In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero, & M. L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory (pp. 133–166). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G. (2006). Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Culicover, P. W., & Jakendoff, R. (2001). Control is not movement. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 493–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Turn over Control to the semantics! Syntax, 9, 131–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duarte, I., Gonçalves, A., & Santos, A. L. (2012). Infinitivo flexionado, independência temporal e controlo. In A. Costa, C. Flores, & N. Alexandre (Eds.), Textos seleccionados do XXVII Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística (pp. 217–234). Lisboa: APL.Google Scholar
Duarte, M. E. (1995). A perda do princípio “evite pronome” no português brasileiro (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Unicamp.
Ferreira, M. (2004). Hyperraising and null subjects in Brazilian Portuguese. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 47 – Collected papers on Romance syntax , 57–85.
Fiéis, A., & Madeira, A. (2014). Towards an analysis of the Portuguese inflected infinitive(s): change and variation. Paper presented at First Seminar on Control and Finiteness at USP . São Paulo.
Figueiredo Silva, M. C. (1994). La position sujet en Portugais Brésilien (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Université de Genève.
Fodor, J. (1975). The language of thought. Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Galves, C. (1993). O enfraquecimento da concordância em português brasileiro. In I. Roberts & M. Kato (Eds.), Português brasileiro, uma viagem diacrônica (pp. 387–408). Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
(2001). Ensaios sobre as gramáticas do português. Campinas: Ed. da Unicamp.Google Scholar
Gorski, E. (2000). Variação no uso do infinitivo pessoal. Organon – Estudos da língua falada, 14, 95–113. Porto Alegre: UFRGS, Instituto de Letras.Google Scholar
Grano, T. A. (2012). Control and restructuring at the syntax-semantics interface (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Chicago.
Higginbotham, J. (1992). Reference and control. In R. Larson, S. Iatridou, U. Lahiri, & J. Higginbotham (Eds.), Control and grammar (pp. 79–108). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, A. (2005). Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 533–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, A., Nayudu, A., & Sheehan, M. (2009). Three partial null-subject languages: A comparison of Brazilian Portuguese, Finnish and Marathi. Studia Linguistica, 63, 59–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, A., & Phimsawat, O. (2015). Generic Pronouns and phi-features: Evidence from Thai (Unpublished manuscript). Newcastle University.
Holmberg A., & Sheehan, M. (2010). Control into finite clauses in partial null-subject languages. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts, & M. Sheehan (Eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory (pp. 125–152). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hornstein, N. (1999). Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry, 30, 69–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). On control. In R. Hendrick (Ed.), Minimalist syntax (pp. 6–81). Oxford: Blackwell.
. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, C-T. J. (1984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 531–574.Google Scholar
Kato, M. (1999). Strong and weak pronominals in the null subject parameter. Probus, 11, 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kato, M. & Negrão, E. V. (2000). Brazilian Portuguese and the null subject parameter. Frankfurt: Vervuert-Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Koizumi, M. (1993). Object agreement phrases and the split VP hypothesis. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 18, 99–148.Google Scholar
Kratzer, A. (2009). Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 40, 187–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, A. (1994). Morphosyntactic variation. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society , 30, 180–201. Chicago, IL: CLS.
Landau, I. (2000). Elements of control: Structure and meaning in infinitival constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Movement out of Control. Linguistic Inquiry, 34, 471–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). The scale of finiteness and the calculus of Control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22, 811–877. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Movement-resistant aspects of control. In S. Dubinsky & W. Davies (Eds.), New horizons in the analysis of control and raising (pp. 293–325). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Two routes of control: Evidence from case transmission in Russian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 26, 877–924. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). The explicit syntax of implicit arguments. Linguistic Inquiry, 41, 357–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Control in generative grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). A two-tiered theory of control. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemle, M. (1984). Análise sintática. São Paulo: Ática.Google Scholar
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1976). Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and topicSubject and topic (pp. 457–489). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (1991). How to set parameters: Arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Livitz, I. (2014). Deriving silence through dependent reference: Focus on pronouns (Unpublished PhD dissertation). NYU.
Lucchesi, D. (2001). As duas grandes vertentes da história sociolinguística do Brasil. Revista de Documentação de Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada (DELTA), 17, 97–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Sistema, mudança e linguagem: Um percurso na história da linguística moderna. São Paulo: Parábola.Google Scholar
(2012). A concordância verbal e a polarização sociolinguística do Brasil (Unpublished manuscript). UFBA.
Lucchesi, D., Baxter, A., & Ribeiro, I. (2009). O português afro-brasileiro. Salvador: EDUFBA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McFadden, T., & Sundaresan, S. (2014). Finiteness in South Asian languages: An introduction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 32, 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miyagawa, S. (2010). Why agree? Why move? Unifying agreement-based and discourse-configurational languages. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Modesto, M. (2000). On the identification of null arguments (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Southern California, USC.
(2007a). Null subjects in Brazilian Portuguese and Finnish: They are not derived by movement. In S. Dubinsky & W. Davies (Eds.), New horizons in the analysis of control and raising (pp. 231–248). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007b). Inflected infinitives in Brazilian Portuguese as an argument both contra and in favor of a movement analysis of control. Revista Letras, 72, 297–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Topic prominence and null subjects. In T. Biberauer (Ed.), The limits of syntactic variation (pp. 375–409). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). What Brazilian Portuguese says about control: Remarks on Boeckx & Hornstein. Syntax, 13, 78–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Finite Control: Where movement goes wrong in Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 10, 3–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Inflected infinitives and restructuring in Brazilian Portuguese. In M. Kato & F. Ordoñez (Eds.), Morphosyntax of Portuguese and Spanish in Latin America (pp. 157–176). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. (2003). Introduction to the practice of statistics. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
Moreira da Silva, S. (1984). Etudes sur la symétrie et l'asymétrie SUJET/OBJET dans le Portugais du Brésil (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Université de Paris VIII.
Ndayiaragije, J. (2012). On raising out of Control. Linguistic Inquiry, 43, 275–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Negrão, E. V. (1986). Anaphora in Brazilian Portuguese complement structures (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Wisconsin, Madison.
(1999). O português brasileiro: Uma língua voltada para o discurso (Full professorship dissertation). University of São Paulo.
Negrão, E. V., & Viotti, E. (2000). Brazilian Portuguese as a discourse-oriented language. In M. Kato & E. Negrão (Eds.), Brazilian Portuguese and the null subject parameter (pp. 105–125). Frankfurt: Vervuert-Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Nunes, J. (2008). Inherent case as a licensing condition for A-movement: The case of hyper-raising constructions in Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 7, 83–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oushiro, L. (2015). Identidade na pluralidade (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of São Paulo.
Pires, A. (2006). The minimalist syntax of defective domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pires, A., & Rothman, J. (2010). Building bridges: Experimental L1 acquisition meets diachronic linguistics. In P. Guijarro-Fuentes & L. Domínguez (Eds.), New directions in language acquisition: Romance languages in the generative perspective (pp. 357–385). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Pitteroff, M., Alexiadou, A., & Fischer, S. (2015). On Partial Control in German (Handout). Universität Stuttgart.
Pontes, E. (1987). O tópico no português do Brasil. Campinas: Pontes Editores.Google Scholar
Quicoli, C. A. (1996). Inflection and parametric variation. In R. Freidin (Ed.), Current issues in comparative grammar (pp. 46–80). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rabelo, P. (2010). Argumentos (EPP) nulos no português do Brasil em contextos oracionais finitos e infinitivos (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Universidade de Brasília.
Raposo, E. (1987). Case Theory and Infl-to-Comp: The inflected infinitive in European Portuguese. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 85–109.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar (pp. 281–337). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, I., & Kato, M. (1993). Português brasileiro, uma viagem diacrônica. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, C. (2004). Impoverished morphology and A-movement out of case domains (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park.
(2007). Agreement and flotation in partial and inverse partial Control configurations. In S. Dubinsky & W. Davies (Eds.), New horizons in the analysis of control and raising (pp. 213–229). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, C., & Hornstein, N. (2013). Epicene Agreement and inflected infinitives when the data is “Under Control”: A reply to Modesto (2010). Syntax, 16, 292–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., Duarte, I., Pires, A., & Santos, A. L. (2013). How early after all? Inflected infinitives in European and Brazilian Portuguese L1 production. In S. Stavrakaki, M. Lalioti, & P. Konstatinopoulou (Eds.), Advances in language acquisition (pp. 164–172). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars. Google Scholar
Scherre, M. P., & Naro, A. J. (2006). Mudança sem mudança: A concordância de número no português brasileiro. Scripta, 18, 107–129.Google Scholar
Sheehan, M. (2012). A new take on Partial Control: Defective thematic intervention. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 6, 1–47.Google Scholar
(2014). Partial Control in Romance languages: The covert comitative analysis. In K. Lahousse & S. Marzo (Eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory (pp. 181–198). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sundaresan, S. (2014). Making sense of silence: finiteness and the (OC) pro vs. pro distinction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 32, 59–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sundaresan, S., & McFadden, T. (2009). Subject distribution in Tamil and other languages: Selection vs. case. Journal of South Asian Linguistics, 2, 5–34.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, A. (2009). Overt nominative subjects in infinitival complements cross-linguistically. NYU Working Papers in Linguistics, 2, 1–55.Google Scholar
Ura, H. (1994). Varieties of raising and the feature-based bare phrase structure theory (MIT Occasional Working Papers in Linguistics 7). Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Wechsler, S., & Zlatić, L. (2003). The many faces of agreement. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Wood, J. (2012). Against the Movement Theory of Control: Another argument from Icelandic. Linguistic Inquiry, 43, 322–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurmbrand, S. (2015). Restructuring cross-linguistically. In T. Bui & D. Özyıldız (Eds.), Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society Annual Meeting 45 (pp. 227–240). Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Landau, Idan
2024. Noncanonical Obligatory Control. Language and Linguistics Compass 18:3 DOI logo
Merchant, Doug & Timothy Gupton
2024. Processing dissociations between raising and control in Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Barbosa, Pilar P.
2021. Alleged obligatorily controlled inflected infinitives. In Non-canonical Control in a Cross-linguistic Perspective [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 270], ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Sheehan, Michelle, Martin Schäfer & Maria Carmen Parafita Couto
2019. Crowdsourcing and Minority Languages: The Case of Galician Inflected Infinitives1. Frontiers in Psychology 10 DOI logo
Fiéis, Alexandra & Ana Madeira
2017. Chapter 12. The Portuguese inflected infinitive across varieties. In Studies on Variation in Portuguese [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 14], ► pp. 280 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.