Cover not available
Part of
New Approaches to Language Attitudes in the Hispanic and Lusophone World
Edited by Talia Bugel and Cecilia Montes-Alcalá
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 25] 2020
► pp. 11–38

Prosody perception meets language attitudes

Vowel lengthening, status judgments, and stereotypes in Argentina

| James Madison University
A long pre-tonic vowel is associated with the regional variety of Cordoban Spanish in Argentina (Lang-Rigal, 2015a). This paper seeks to discover how, and if, prosodic production is correlated with perceived competence. Listeners judged the intelligence and occupation of anonymous speakers based on samples of their spontaneous speech. Results show that perceived speaker intelligence and occupation correlate with the degree of pre-tonic vowel lengthening (t = 4.577, p < .01). When a longer pre-tonic vowel was produced, the speaker’s competence was more negatively evaluated. However, Córdoba speakers were evaluated positively for attractiveness and integrity, supporting Labov et al. (1968), Giles (1971, 1973), and Preston (1999) who found regional varieties were viewed as non-standard and of lower social status relative to the perceived standard dialect.
Keywords: Córdoba Argentina, language attitudes, perception, vowel lengthening, dialects of Argentina
Article outline
  • Introduction
    • The tonada cordobesa
    • Language attitudes
    • Language attitudes in Argentina
    • Research questions
  • Methodology
    • Speakers
    • Listeners
    • Audio stimuli
    • Test instrument
    • Procedure
    • Analysis
    • Perceived intelligence
    • Perceived occupation
    • Vowel lengthening
    • Dialect identification
  • Results
    • Dialect identification of speaker
    • Perceived speaker competence
      • Intelligence
    • Occupation
    • Vowel lengthening
    • Research questions
  • Discussion
    • Dialect identification of speaker
    • Perceived speaker competence and integrity
    • The standard dialect of Argentina
  • Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 April 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.25.01lan
References (39)
References
Alonso, A. (1935). El problema de la lengua en América. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Berry, G. (October 2014). Transcribing the “tune”: Prosodic and sociolinguistic properties of the to:nada cordobesa. Paper presented at First Symposium on Intonation and Tone in the Spanish speaking World, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. <[URL]> (21 October, 2019).
Blanco, M. I. (1993). Lengua e identidad: Actitudes hacia el español de España y el español de la Argentina. In L. Martínez Cuitiño, E. Lois, & A. Barrenechea (Eds.), Actas del III Congreso Argentino de Hispanistas ‘España en América y América en España’ (pp. 333–339). Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Bugel, T. (2012). Buenas y no tan buenas variedades del español: Opiniones y actitudes en Montevideo y Buenos Aires. Revista Internacional De Lingüística Iberoamericana: RILI, 19, 83–107.Google Scholar
Capusotto, P. (2006). Curso de Cordobés [video]. Retrieved from <[URL]> (21 October, 2019).
Castro, A. (1941). La peculiaridad lingüística rioplatense y su sentido histórico. Buenos Aires: Losada.Google Scholar
Colantoni, L. (2011). Broad-focus declaratives in Argentine Spanish contact and non-contact varieties. In C. Gabriel & C. Lleó (Eds.), Intonational phrasing in Romance and Germanic: Cross-linguistic and bilingual studies (pp. 183–212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Criscordobes. (2006). Curso de Cordobés para extranjeros [video]. Retrieved from <[URL]> (21 October, 2019).
Edwards, J. (1999). Refining our understanding of language attitudes. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18(1), 101–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fontanella de Weinberg, M. B. (1971). La entonación del español de Córdoba (Argentina). Thesaurus: Boletín del Instituto Caro y Cuervo, 26(1), 11–21.Google Scholar
Garrett, P. N., Coupland, N., & Williams, A. (2003). Investigating language attitudes: Social meanings of dialect, ethnicity, and performance. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Giles, H. (1971). Patterns of evaluation to R.P., South Welsh and Somerset accented speech, British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 280–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1973). Communicative effectiveness as a function of accented speech. Speech Monographs, 40, 330–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giles, H., & Coupland, N. (1991). Language: Contexts and consequence. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
De Granda, G. (2003). Estudios lingüísticos hispanoamericanos: Historia, sociedades y contactos (Vol. 3). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
van Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hualde, J. (2002). Intonation in Romance. Probus: International Journal of Latin and Romance Linguistics, 14(1), 1–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaworski. (2010). Pequeña gramática cordobesa: Para extranjeros: reglas básicas de la tonada cordobesa [website]. Retrieved from <[URL]> (21 October 2019).
Labov, W., Cohen, P., Robins, C., & Lewis, J. (1968). A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City. Final Report, Cooperative Research Project 3288 (Vols. I. & II. Washington, DC: Office of Education.Google Scholar
Lang, J. (2010). Prosody in Córdoba, Argentina: A sociolinguistic analysis of the Tonada cordobesa. Paper presented at the annual meeting of New Ways of Analyzing Variation, San Antonio, TX.
Lang-Rigal, J. (2015a). Dialect identification and listener attributes: Do you hear la tonada? In R. Klassen, J. M. Liceras, & E. Valenzuela (Eds.), Hispanic linguistics at the crossroads: Theoretical linguistics, language acquisition and language contact. Proceedings of the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium 2013 (pp. 269–292). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b). Regional variation in the devoicing of the alveopalatal fricative in Argentina. Estudios de Fonética Experimental, XXIV, 141–170.Google Scholar
(2015c). La percepción del habla de Córdoba, Argentina: Una prueba que combina las actitudes con la identificación de dialecto. Signo y Seña, 28, 111–138.Google Scholar
Lenardon, M. L. (2010). Variation of the palatals in Spanish from Córdoba (Argentina). Paper presented at the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, University of Indiana, Bloomington, IN.
Lipski, J. (1994). Latin American Spanish. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Llull, G., & Pinardi, L. C. (2014). Actitudes lingüísticas en la Argentina. El español en Buenos Aires: Una aproximación a las representaciones de sus hablantes. In A. B. Chiquito & M. A. Quesada Pacheco (Eds.), Actitudes lingüísticas de los hispanohablantes hacia el idioma español y sus variantes, Bergen Language and Linguistic Studies (BeLLS), 5 (pp. 1–62). <[URL]> (21 October, 2019).
Mackenzie, I. (2001). A linguistic introduction to Spanish. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Malanca, A., Prevedello, N. L., & Toniolo, M. T. (1981). Actitud del hablante frente a su lengua. Resultado de una encuesta realizada en la ciudad de Córdoba, Argentina. Lingüística Española Actual, 3(1), 33–47.Google Scholar
Najle, M "Matzorama". (2016) MuyLiebre – Curso de Cordobés 01 [video]. Retrieved from <[URL]> (2 December, 2019).
Papapavlou, A., & Sophocleous, A. (2009). Language attitudes and folk perceptions towards linguistic variation. In S. Tsiplakou, M. Karyolemou, & P. Pavlou (Eds.), Language variation: European perspectives, II (pp. 179–189). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2002). Mother tongues, governmentality, and protectionism. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 154, 11–28.Google Scholar
Preston, D. R. (1999). A language attitude approach to the perception of regional variety. In D. R. Preston (Ed.), Handbook of perceptual dialectology (Vol. I, pp. 359–374). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Louro, C. (2008). Speakers’ attitudes and the ‘standard’ in Argentinian Spanish. Paper presented at the Australian Linguistic Society Conference, University of Sydney, Australia.
(2013). Actitudes lingüísticas de los hablantes rioplatenses: Un estudio cualitativo. In L. Colantoni & C. Rodriguez Louro (Eds.), Perspectivas teóricas y experimentales en el español de la Argentina (pp. 453–468). Madrid & Frankfurt: Iberoamericana & Vervuert.Google Scholar
Ryan, E., Giles, H., & Sebastian, R. J. (1982). An integrative perspective for the study of attitudes toward language variation. In E. B. Ryan & H. Giles (Eds.), Attitudes toward language variation: Social and applied contexts (pp. 1–19). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Solé, C. A. (1987). Lenguaje y nacionalismo en la Argentina. In T. Morgan, J. Lee, & B. Van Patten (Eds.), Language and language use: Studies in Spanish (pp. 209–218). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Vidal de Battini, B. (1964). El español de la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Consejo Nacional de Educación.Google Scholar
Viramonte de Ávalos, M., & Carullo de Díaz, A. M. (1993). Enseñanza y Aprendizaje de la lengua materna en Córdoba (capital). Realidad y Problemática. Trabajos del CIL, VI, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.Google Scholar
Yorio, C. A. (1973). Phonological style in the dialect of Spanish of Córdoba, Argentina (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan.Google Scholar