Cover not available
Part of
Current Theoretical and Applied Perspectives on Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics
Edited by Diego Pascual y Cabo and Idoia Elola
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 27] 2020
► pp. 253–272

Chapter 12
Proposing a tripartite intensifier system

Re, muy, and bien in Buenos Aires and Tucumán, Argentina

 | University of Pittsburgh
 | Georgia College & State University
Tripartite systems demonstrate how a dominant form coexists with other variants without any falling into disuse, as each occupies a particular space (Kapatsinski, 2009). Intensifiers reveal language change through rapid variability and recycling in popularity (Tagliamonte, 2008), as seen in variationist analyses of Spanish intensification via bien and muy (Brown & Cortés-Torres, 2013).
We consider an additional variant (i.e., re) and determine to what extent we can classify Argentinean intensifiers as a tripartite system. In a contextualized task which manipulated adjective quality, verb type, and animacy, 136 speakers from Buenos Aires and Tucumán selected their preferred intensifier. Mixed-effects regressions indicated re is constrained linguistically and socially, and that it occupies a different, specialized space from bien, while muy pervades cross-contextually.
Keywords: intensifiers, variable intensification, default forms, Argentinean Spanish
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous research
    • 2.1Default forms and tripartite systems
    • 2.2Intensifiers
  • 3.The current study
  • 4.Method
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2Tasks
    • 4.3Analysis
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Distribution of forms
    • 5.2Mixed-effects regression models
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Limitations, future directions, and conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 June 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.27.12kan
References (39)
References
Agostini, T. D., & Schwenter, S. A. (2018). Variable negative concord in Brazilian Portuguese: Acceptability and frequency. In J. E. MacDonald (Ed.), Contemporary trends in Hispanic and Lusophone linguistics: Selected papers from the Hispanic Linguistic Symposium 2015 (pp. 71–94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Álvarez Catalá, S. (2009). Uso revitalizador del prefijo latino RE- como recurso de neología expresiva o apreciativa en la lengua coloquial del español rioplatense. Debate Terminológico. Ago. 2009, No. 05.Google Scholar
Arjona, M. (1990). El adverbio muy y otros intensificadores en el habla popular de México. Anuario de Letras, 28, 75–96.Google Scholar
Brown, E. L., & Cortés-Torres, M. (2013). Puerto Rican intensifiers: Bien/muy variables. In A. M. Carvalho & S. Beaudrie (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics (pp. 11–19). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2003). Typology and universals (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö. (1985). Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Davies, M., & Hayward Davies, K. (2018). A frequency dictionary of Spanish: Core vocabulary for learners (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Wulff, S. (2015). Usage-based approaches to SLA. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 75–93). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Enrique-Arias, A. (2010). On language contact as an inhibitor of language change. In A. Breitbarth, C. Lucas, S. Watts, & D. Willis (Eds.), Continuity and change in grammar (pp. 97–117). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K. L. (2003). A comparison of copula choice in advanced and native Spanish. Language Learning, 53, 703–764. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Rexach, J., & González–Rivera, M. (2017). Adverbial elatives in Caribbean Spanish. In O. Fernández-Soriano, E. Castroviejo Miró, & I. Pérez-Jiménez (Eds.), Boundaries, phases, and interfaces: Case studies in honor of Violeta Demonte (pp. 108–128). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (2014). The three adnominal possessive constructions in Egyptian-Coptic: Three degrees of grammaticalization. In M. Haspelmath, E. Grossman, & T. S. Richter (Eds.), Egyptian-Coptic linguistics in typological perspective (pp. 262–285). Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ito, R., & Tagliamonte, S. (2003). Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool: Layering and recycling in English intensifiers. Language in Society, 32(2), 257–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. (2009). Getting off the GoldVarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed- effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1), 359–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanwit, M. (2017). What we gain by combining variationist and concept-oriented approaches: The case of acquiring Spanish future-time expression. Language Learning, 67(2), 461–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanwit, M., Elias, V., & Clay, R. (2018). Acquiring intensifier variation abroad: Exploring muy and bien in Spain and Mexico. Foreign Language Annals, 51(2), 455–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanwit, M., & Solon, M. (2013). Acquiring variation in future-time expression abroad in Valencia, Spain and Mérida, Mexico. In J. E. Aaron, J. Cabrelli Amaro, G. Lord, & A. de Prada Pérez (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 16th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 206–221). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Kanwit, M., Terán, V., & Pisabarro Sarrió, S. (2017). Un fenómeno bien curioso: New methods for analyzing variable intensification across four dialects of Spain and Argentina. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 10(2), 259–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kapatsinski, V. (2009). Adversative conjunction choice in Russian: Semantic and syntactic influences on lexical selection. Language Variation and Change, 21(2), 157–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (2001). Principles of linguistic change, Vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Martín García, J. (1998). Los prefijos intensivos del español: Caracterización morfo- semántica. E.L.U.A., 12, 103–116.Google Scholar
McColl Miller, R. (2007). Trask’s historical linguistics (2nd ed.). London: Hodder.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. A., & Schwenter, S. A. (2016). Vosotros, ustedes, and the myth of the symmetrical Castilian pronoun system. In A. Cuza, L. Czerwionka, & D. J. Olson (Eds.), Inquiries in Hispanic linguistics: From theory to empirical evidence (pp. 263–280). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, K. R., & Myors, B. (2004). Statistical power analysis (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mustanoja, T. F. (1960). A Middle English syntax. Helsinki: Societe Neophilologique.Google Scholar
Pastor, A., & Armstrong, G. (2016). Una “buena” manera de hablar acerca de grados: Bien con adjetivos en español. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 9(2), 401–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penny, R. (2004). Variación y cambio en español. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Peters, H. (1992). English boosters: Some synchronic and diachronic aspects. In G. Kellermann & M. D. Morrissey (Eds.), Diachrony within synchrony: Language history and cognition (pp. 529–45). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Pharies, D. (2009). Rebién, retebién, requetebién: Allomorphy of the Spanish prefix re-. Romance Quarterly, 56(1), 13–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salvador Salvador, F. (1987). La gradación adjetiva en el habla popular de Ciudad de México. In Actas del I Congreso Internacional del Español de América (pp. 419–430). San Juan de Puerto Rico: Academia Puertorriqueña de la Lengua Española.Google Scholar
Schwenter, S. A., & Torres Cacoullos, R. (2008). Defaults and indeterminacy in temporal grammaticalization: The “perfect” road to perfective. Language Variation and Change, 20, 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sedano, M. (2002–2004). Este tema es muy/bien interesante. Archivo de Filología Aragonesa, 59–60, 859–873.Google Scholar
Serradilla Castaño, A. (2006). Bien + adjetivo como perífrasis de superlativo en español. Particularidades semánticas y sintácticas. Verba, 33, 215–233.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. (2008). So different and pretty cool! Recycling intensifiers in Toronto, Canada. English Language and Linguistics, 12(2), 361–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terán, V., & Kanwit, M. (2018). Variable past-time expression across multiple tasks in Tucumán, Argentina. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada / Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 605–637. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terán, V., & Ortega-Llebaria, M. (2017). A description of Tucumán Spanish intonation in Argentina. Open Linguistics, 3, 456–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar