Cover not available
Part of
Variation and Evolution: Aspects of language contact and contrast across the Spanish-speaking world
Edited by Sandro Sessarego, Juan J. Colomina-Almiñana and Adrián Rodríguez-Riccelli
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 29] 2020
► pp. 11–32

Chapter 1
Cross-dialectal productivity of the Spanish subjunctive in nominal clause complements

| The Ohio State University
| Universiteit Gent
We performed a large-scale corpus study of the subjunctive across Argentine, Mexican, and Peninsular Spanish, in order to determine possible differences in productivity across dialects. Our data (N = 6,822) from the web/dialects section of Davies’ (2016–) Corpus del Español were collected through random sampling of 22 matrix verb governors. All three dialects were significantly different from one another in type:token ratio, whereas only Spain differed from the others in terms of hapax legomena:type ratio. Furthermore, only eight verbs showed the same behavior across all dialects. Subjunctive productivity thus varies by both dialect and governor, thereby revealing the critical importance of both inter- and intra-dialectal variation for the correct analysis of morphosyntactic phenomena. The conditioning of the variation across dialects, nevertheless, was similar: mixed-effects logistic regression in R revealed that negated governors and cases of non-coreferentiality between main and subordinate clause subjects select significantly more subjunctive.
Keywords: subjunctive, nominal clauses, productivity, type:token ratio, variation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous literature
    • 2.1The Spanish subjunctive
    • 2.2Morphological productivity
  • 3.Research questions and hypotheses
  • 4.Methods
  • 5.Results
  • 6.Discussion and conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 11 August 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.29.01sch
References (26)
References
Baayen, R. H. (2009). Corpus linguistics in morphology: Morphological productivity. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kyto (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook (pp. 900–919). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blake, R. (1981). Some empirically based observations on adult usage of the subjunctive mood in Mexico City. In J. Lantolf & G. Stone (Eds.), Current research in Romance languages (pp. 13–22). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Bosque, I. (2012). Mood: Indicative vs. subjunctive. In J. I. Hualde, A. Olarrea & E. O’Rourke (Eds.), The handbook of hispanic linguistics (pp. 373–394). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Busch, H-J. (2017). A complete guide to the Spanish subjunctive: A reference for teachers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., & Torres Cacoullos, R. (2009). The role of prefabs in grammaticization: How the particular and the general interact in language change. In R. Corrigan, E. Moravcsik, H. Ouali & K. Wheatley (Eds.), Formulaic language, Vol 1: Distribution and historical change (pp. 187–217). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. (2016–). Corpus del español: Two billion words, 21 countries. Retrieved from <[URL]> (16 March, 2020).
DeMello, G. (1995). Alternancia modal indicativo/subjuntivo con expresiones de posibilidad y probabilidad. Verba, 22, 339–361.Google Scholar
Gallego, M. (2016). An analysis of subjunctive frequency and semantic predictors of mood in Central Argentinian Spanish. In A. Cuza, L. Czerwionka, & D. J. Olsen (Eds.), Inquiries in Hispanic linguistics: From theory to empirical evidence (pp. 301–316). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallego, M., & Alonso-Marks, E. (2014). Degrees of subjunctive vitality among monolingual speakers of Peninsular and Argentinian Spanish. Borealis: An international journal of Hispanic linguistics, 2(2), 95–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González-Salinas, A. (2003). The use of present subjunctive and modal alternation in three socio-educational groups from Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico: A descriptive and comparative linguistic analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). State University of New York.Google Scholar
Hoff, M. (2019). Settledness and mood alternation: A semantic-pragmatic analysis of Spanish future-framed adverbials (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Kempchinsky, P. (2009). What can the subjunctive disjoint reference effect tell us about the subjunctive? Lingua, 119, 1788–1810. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Subjuntivo. In J. Gutiérrez-Rexach (Ed.), Enciclopedia de lingüística hispánica, vol. 2 (pp. 65–74). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Labov, W (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
LaCasse, D. (2018). Structural and semantic conditioning of the New Mexican Spanish subjunctive: Maintenance in a contact variety. Presented at NWAV 47, NYU, 18–21 October, 2018.
Martín Butragueño, P., & Lastra, Y. (2011–2015). Corpus sociolingüístico de la ciudad de México. México: El Colegio de México. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Pierrehumbert, J., & Granell, R. (2018). On hapax legomena and morphological productivity. In S. Kübler & G. Nicolai (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th SIGMORPHON Workshop on Computational Research in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology (pp. 125–130). Brussels: The Special Interest Group on Computational Morphology and Phonology. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poplack, S., Torres Cacoullos, R., Dion, N., Berlinck, R. de A., Digesto, S., Lacasse, D., & Steuck, J. (2018). Variation and grammaticalization in Romance: A cross-linguistic study of the subjunctive. In W. Ayres-Bennett & J. Carruthers (Eds.), Manuals in linguistics: Romance sociolinguistics (pp. 217–52). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quer, J. (2001). Interpreting mood. Probus, 13(1), 81–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosemeyer, M., & Schwenter, S. (2019). Entrenchment and persistence in language change: The Spanish past subjunctive. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 15(1), 167–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. (1994). The gradual loss of mood distinctions in Los Angeles Spanish. Language Variation and Change, 6(3), 255–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. (2006). Historical change in synchronic perspective: The legacy of British dialects. In Ans van Kemenade and Bettelou Los (eds.), The handbook of the history of English, 477–506. Malden and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, R., LaCasse, D., Johns, M., & De la Rosa Yacomelo, J. (2017). El subjuntivo: Hacia la rutinización. Moenia: Revista Lucense de Lingüística y Literatura, 23, 73–94.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, R., & Travis, C. (2018). Bilingualism in the community: Code-switching and grammars in contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Villalta, E. (2008). Mood and gradability: An investigation of the subjunctive mood in Spanish. Linguistics and Philosophy, 31, 467–522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

HOFF, MARK
2023. The Role of Frequency in Morphosyntactic Variation. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics, ► pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
KANWIT, MATTHEW & JUAN BERRÍOS
2023. Corpora, Cognition, and Usage‐Based Approaches. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics, ► pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Potowski, Kim & Lourdes Torres
2023. Spanish in Chicago, DOI logo
Giancaspro, David, Silvia Perez‐Cortes & Josh Higdon
2022. (Ir)regular Mood Swings: Lexical Variability in Heritage Speakers’ Oral Production of Subjunctive Mood. Language Learning 72:2 ► pp. 456 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.