Cover not available
Part of
Aspects of Latin American Spanish Dialectology: In honor of Terrell A. Morgan
Edited by Manuel Díaz-Campos and Sandro Sessarego
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 32] 2021
► pp. 47–68

Chapter 3
Variable constraints on se lo(s) in Mexican Spanish

| The Ohio State University
| The Ohio State University
We examine the alternation between normative se lo/la and se los/las to express a plural indirect object and singular direct object. Using corpus data from Mexico City and Monterrey, we find that significant predictors of the more frequent variant, se los, are number of the verb, referential distance, and presence of a dative prepositional phrase. Contra previous claims that se los marks plurality in ambiguous dative referents, we argue that it serves as an accessibility marker that makes a plural referent more salient if not recently mentioned. Se los is used most frequently with first-person singular verbs, resulting in (near-)fixed expressions. These findings demonstrate the sensitivity of Spanish clitics to discourse-pragmatic context and highlight limitations of sentence-level analysis of morphosyntactic variants.
Keywords: datives, object clitics, Mexican Spanish, discourse accessibility
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous literature
  • 3.Research questions and hypotheses
  • 4.Methodology
    • 4.1The corpora
    • 4.2Variable context
    • 4.3Coding of predictors
    • 4.4Statistical methods
  • 5.Results
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 January 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.32.03sch
References (33)
References
Alvar, M. (2010). El español en México. Estudios, mapas, textos. Madrid, Spain: Universidad de Alcalá.Google Scholar
Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun phrase antecedents. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Belloro, V. (2004). A role and reference grammar account for third-person clitic clusters in Spanish (Unpublished MA Thesis). The State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Bonet, E. (1995). Feature structure of Romance clitics. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 13, 607–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Company, C. (1992). Un cambio en proceso: “El libro, ¿Quién se los prestó?” In E. L. Traill (Ed.), Scripta philologica in honorem Juan M. Lope Blanch (Vol. 2, pp. 349–362). México, DF: UNAM.Google Scholar
(2006). El objeto indirecto. In C. Company (Ed.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Primera parte: La frase verbal, (Vol. 1, pp. 479–574). México, DF: UNAM/Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
DeMello, G. (1992). Se los for se lo in the spoken cultural Spanish of eleven cities. Hispanic Journal, 13, 165–179.Google Scholar
Gili y Gaya, S. (1993 [1943]). Curso superior de sintaxis española (15th ed.). Barcelona, Spain: Biblograf.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In T. Givón (Ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study (pp. 1–42). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gustafson, G. (2017). Variable number agreement in the Spanish dative pronoun le(s). Ms. The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (1996). The morphology of Spanish clitics. In H. Campos & P. Kempchinsky (Eds.), Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory (pp. 168–197). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Hothorn, T., Hornik, K., & Zeileis, A. (2006). Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 15(3), 651–674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kailuweit, R. (2006). “Floating plurals,” prodrop and agreement – an optimality-based RRG approach. In R. D. Van Valin, Jr. (Ed.), Investigations of the syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface (pp. 179–202). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kany, C. (1945). American Spanish Syntax. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest Package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lope Blanch, J. M. (Ed.). (1990–2000). Atlas lingüístico de México. México, DF: Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Menéndez Pidal, R. (1965). Manual de gramática histórica española (12th ed.). Madrid, Spain: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Moreno de Alba, J. G. (2013a). ‘Se los dije [a ellos]’ por ‘se lo dije [a ellos].’ El Atlas Lingüístico de México. Anuario de Letras. Lingüística y Filología, 1(1), 147–182.Google Scholar
(2013b). Notas de gramática dialectal (El Atlas Lingüístico de México). México, DF: UNAM.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, F. (2011). Clitics in Spanish. In J. I. Hualde, A. Olarrea, & E. O’Rourke (Eds.), The handbook of Hispanic linguistics (pp. 423–451). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rael, J. B. (1940). Associative interference in Spanish. Hispanic Review, 8(4), 346–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Real Academia Española. (2005). Diccionario panhispánico de dudas. Madrid, Spain: Santillana/RAE.Google Scholar
. (2009). Nueva gramática de la lengua española (2 Vols.). Madrid, Spain: Espasa.Google Scholar
Real Academia Española: Banco de datos (CREA) [en línea]. Corpus de referencia del español actual. <[URL]> (17 July, 2020).
Reig Alamillo, A. (2009). Cross-dialectal variation in propositional anaphora: Null objects and propositional lo in Mexican and Peninsular Spanish. Language Variation & Change, 21, 381–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Revilla, M. (1910). Provincialismos de expresión en Méjico. In Memorias de la Academia Mexicana de la Lengua VI (pp. 352–367). Mexico, DF: Ediciones del centenario de la Academia Mexicana.Google Scholar
Rivarola, J. L. (1985). Se los por se lo. Lexis, 9, 239–244.Google Scholar
Romero Morales, J. (2008). Los dativos en el español. Madrid, Spain: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D. (1988). Sociolinguistics and syntactic variation. In F. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, IV: The socio-cultural context (pp. 140–161). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, S. A. (2006). Null objects across South America. In T. L. Face & C. Klee (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 8th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 23–36). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Tippets, I. & Schwenter, S. A. (2007). Relative animacy and differential object marking in Spanish. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 36, Philadelphia, PA.