Chapter 1
Language use and identity negotiation in the linguistic landscape
of Chipilo, Mexico
This is the first study exploring the
characteristics of the Linguistic Landscape of Chipilo, a town of an
immigrant community of Italian origin in Mexico, which has
maintained its language and ethnic identity over six generations.
The linguistic landscape (hereafter: LL) marks the geographical
space inhabited by Chipileños and reflects the relation among the
languages used (Spanish, Veneto, Italian and English). Its
distinctive trait is the combination of textual items with the
typical sounds, smells and tastes that can be perceived in the
streets of the town. The multisensory LL creates a unique ambience
and contributes to the symbolic construction of a distinct public
space and the promotion of the collective ethnic identity within the
community in relation to other groups.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Theoretical framework
- Chipilo, a brief sociolinguistic background
- Methodology
- Results
- Official signs
- Nonofficial signs
- Nonofficial signs in Veneto and Spanish
- Italian in the linguistic landscape of Chipilo
- Nonofficial signs in Italian and Spanish
- English in the linguistic landscape of Chipilo
- The interanimation of various -scapes in Chipilo
- Conclusions
-
References
References (25)
References
Backhaus, P. (2006). Multilingualism in Tokyo: A look into the
linguistic landscape. In D. Gorter (Ed.), Linguistic landscape. A new approach to
multilingualism (pp. 52–66). Multilingual Matters.
Ben-Rafael, E., Shohamy, E., Amara, M. H., & Trumper-Hecht, N. (2006). Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of
the public space: The case of Israel. In D. Gorter (Ed.), Linguistic landscape: A new approach to
multilingualism (pp. 7–31). Multilingual Matters.
Blommaert, J. (2013). Semiotic and spatial scope towards a materialist
semiotics. In N. Pachler, & M. Böck (Eds.), Multimodality and social semiosis. Communication,
meaning-making, and learning in the work of Gunther
Kress (pp. 29–38). Routledge.
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: a sociocultural
linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614.
Calvi, M. V. (2018). Español e italiano en el paisaje lingüístico de
Milán: ¿Traducción, mediación o
translanguaging? Lingue e Linguaggi, 25, 145–172.
Calvi, M. V., & Uberti-Bona, M. (2020). Negotiating languages, identities and space in
Hispanic linguistic landscape in Milan. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development RMMM, 41(1), 25–44.
Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2006). Linguistic landscape and minority
languages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 67–80.
De Fina, A., Schiffrin, D., & Bamberg, M. G. W. (Eds.). (2006). Discourse and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in
natural languages. Cambridge University Press.
García Negroni, M. M., & Tordesillas Colado, M. (2001). La enunciación en la lengua. De la deixis a la
polifonía. Editorial Gredos.
Gee, J. P. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis. Theory and
method. Routledge.
Gorter, D. (2006). Linguistic landscape: An approach to
multilingualism. Multilingual Matters.
Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic
vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16, 23–49.
Kaplan-Weinger, J., & Ullman, C. (2015). Methods for the ethnography of communication. Language
in use in schools and communities. Routledge.
Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1990). Language and social
identification. In D. Abrams, & M. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical
advances (pp. 211–229). Harvester-Wheatsheat.
Sbrighi, L. (2018). El aumento de las uniones mixtas en Chipilo,
México: Actitudes y percepción identitaria en una comunidad
inmigrante de origen italiano. Cuadernos Aispi, 12, 191–214.
Sbrighi, L. (2019). Construcción discursiva de la identidad propia y
de la nueva percepción del otro en Chipilo,
México (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Mexico.
Sbrighi, L., Greathouse Amador, L. M., & Preciado Lloyd, P. N. (2020). The new perception of the other in Chipilo,
Mexico. Lengua y migración / Language and Migration, 12(1), 7–35.
Shohamy, E., & Gorter, D. (Eds.). (2009). Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery. Routledge.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2000). Ideología. Gedisa.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Bhujel, Birendra & Sweta Sinha
2024.
Linguistic landscape as a tool of identity negotiation: The case of the Nepali ethnic communities in West Bengal.
Ethnicities
Crivelli Minutti, Eduardo
2023.
Cuarenta años de Hermanamiento Segusino-Chipilo: integración y asimilación segmentada de una comunidad véneta en el altiplano mexicano.
Revista Española de Desarrollo y Cooperación 50:1
► pp. 65 ff.
Álvarez, Alba Arias & Sheryl Bernardo-Hinesley
2023.
Uncovering minoritized voices: The linguistic landscape of Mieres, Asturies.
Open Linguistics 9:1
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.