Cover not available
Part of
Hispanic Linguistics at the Crossroads: Theoretical linguistics, language acquisition and language contact
Edited by Rachel Klassen, Juana M. Liceras and Elena Valenzuela
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 4] 2015
► pp. 191–210

Perfecting the past

| University of Toronto
| University of Toronto
Studies on Spanish first language (L1) acquisition have shown that the Present Perfect (PP) appears together with the Present tense, or immediately after, and Peninsular Spanish children use it productively before the Preterit. Though the PP has become the default form of past reference in many varieties of Peninsular Spanish, this finding is surprising given the Perfect’s morphological and semantic complexity. In a corpus study of longitudinal spontaneous data of two L1 Peninsular Spanish children (María, 1;09–3;11; Emilio, 1;09–3;10), we explore the emergence and distribution of tenses, and the types of uses of the PP. Results are consistent with the absence of a complex, indirect referential meaning for the PP and suggest that children have a simpler meaning for it, and thus having the form does not necessarily imply having the meaning.
Keywords: L1 acquisition, Peninsular Spanish, Present Perfect, tense and aspect.
Published online: 30 July 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.4.10mar
References (33)
References
Aguado, G. (1995). El desarrollo del lenguaje de 0 a 3 años. Madrid: Ciencias de la educación preescolar y especial.Google Scholar
Bel, A. (2002). Early verbs and the acquisition of tense feature in Spanish and Catalan. In A.-T. Pérez-Leroux & J.M. Liceras (Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax: The L1/L2 connection. (pp. 1–34). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bello, Andrés. (1847). Gramática de la lengua castellana destinada al uso de los americanos. Madrid: Edaf (1984 edition). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. & Slobin, D. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawarence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Binnick, R. (1991). Time and the verb: A guide to tense and aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cowper, E. (2003). Tense, mood and aspect: A feature-geometric approach. Ms. University of Toronto.Google Scholar
. (2005). The geometry of interpretable features: INFL in English and Spanish. Language, 81(1), 10–46.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, D. (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, V.C. (1986). The acquisition of the present perfect: Explaining differences in the speech of Scottish and American children. Journal of Child Language, 13, 537–560. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, A., & Pianesi, F. (1998). Tense and aspect: From semantics to morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hernández Pina, F. (1984). Teorías psicosociolingüísticas y su aplicación a la adquisición del español como lengua materna. Madrid: Siglo veintiuno editores.Google Scholar
Howe, C. (2013). The Spanish perfects. Pathways of emergent meaning. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iatridou, S. (2003). A little bit more on the English perfect. In A. Alexiadou, M. Rathert, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Perfect Explorations (pp. 133–152). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iatridou, S., Anagnostopoulou, E., & Pancheva, R. (2003). Observations about the form and meaning of the perfect. In A. Alexiadou, M. Rathert, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Perfect explorations (pp. 153–204). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamp, H., & Riley, U. (1993). From discourse to logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Klein, W. (1992). The present perfect ‘puzzle’. Language, 68, 525–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1994). Time in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
López Ornat, S. (1994). La adquisición de la lengua española. Madrid: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (Third Edition). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? New York, NY: Dial Press.
McCawley, J. (1971). Tense and time reference in English. In C. Fillmore & T. Langendoen (Eds.), Studies in linguistic semantics (pp. 97–113). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
McCoard, R. (1978). The English perfect: Tense choice and pragmatic inferences. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1990). Events in the semantics of English: A study of subatomic semantics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A.T. (2008). Subjuntivo y conciencia de la subjetividad en la adquisición infantil del lenguaje y la teoría de la mente. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología, 28, 90–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portner, P. (2003). The (temporal) semantics and (modal) pragmatics of the perfect. Linguists and Philosophy, 26, 459–510. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1947). Elements of symbolic logic. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rojo, G., & Veiga, A. (1999). El tiempo verbal: Los tiempos simples. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 2867–2934). Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Schwenter, S., & Torres Cacoullos, R. (2008). Defaults and indeterminacy in temporal grammaticalization: The ‘perfect’ road to perfective. Language Variation and Change, 20, 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vila, I. (1990). Adquisición y desarrollo del lenguaje. Barcelona: Graó.Google Scholar
Vlach, F. (1993). Temporal adverbials, tenses, and the perfect. Linguistics and Philosophy, 16, 231–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Fintel, K., & Iatridou, S. (2005). Since Since. Ms. MIT.
Zagona, K. (2007). Some effects of aspect on tense construal. Lingua, 117, 464–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

LaMontagne, Joanne Markle & Ana Teresa Pérez-Leroux
2016. In search of the perfect tense. In Language Acquisition Beyond Parameters [Studies in Bilingualism, 51], ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.