Cover not available
Part of
Hispanic Linguistics at the Crossroads: Theoretical linguistics, language acquisition and language contact
Edited by Rachel Klassen, Juana M. Liceras and Elena Valenzuela
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 4] 2015
► pp. 269–292

Dialect identification and listener attributes

Do you hear la tonada?

| James Madison University
This study investigates the perception of vowel-lengthening, a feature characteristic of the Spanish spoken in Córdoba, Argentina: the tonada cordobesa. Uniquely, the lengthening occurs on the pre-tonic syllable (Fontanella de Weinberg, 1971; Yorio, 1973; Lang, 2010), and is believed to be accompanied by a pitch peak (Fontanella de Weinberg, 1971). The goals of this experiment are to determine if duration alone (i.e. without intonational changes) is a strong enough cue for identifying speakers from Córdoba, and what listener features affect this perception. A matched-guise methodology is employed in which natural and manipulated (pre-tonic vowel duration) tokens are presented to Argentine listeners in a dialect identification task. Results show that longer pre-tonic vowel durations are associated with a Córdoba speaker origin, regardless of the speaker’s true regional origin or other linguistic cues.
Keywords: Argentina, dialect identification, prosody perception, vowel lengthening
Published online: 30 July 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.4.14lan
References (38)
References
Bezooijen, R. (1988). The relative importance of pronunciation, prosody, and voice quality for the attribution of social status and personality characteristics. In R. Hout & U. Knops (Eds.), Language attitudes in the Dutch language area (pp. 85–103). Providence, RI: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2010). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.44).Google Scholar
Cacciavillani, C.A. (1988). Diferencia lingüística del habla popular de Córdoba (Argentina). In D. Kremer (Ed.), Actes du XVIIIe Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes, V: Section IV: Linguistique pragmatique et linguistique sociolinguistique. (pp. 168–185). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Catinelli, A. (1985). El habla de la provincia de Córdoba. Córdoba, Argentina: Centro de Estudios de la Lengua.Google Scholar
Castellani, G. (1998). The devoicing of Žeísmo in Porteño Spanish. RLA: Romance Languages Annual, 10(2), 488–495.Google Scholar
Clopper, C.G., & Pisoni, D.B. (2004). Homebodies and army brats: Some effects of early linguistic experience and residential history on dialect categorization. Language Variation And Change, 16(1), 31–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, L., & Gurlekian, J. (2002). Modeling intonation for synthesis: Pitch accents and contour patterns in Argentine Spanish. Paper presented at the Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology, University of Minnesota.
. (2004). Convergence and intonation: Historical evidence from Buenos Aires Spanish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 107–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, L. (2005). Dissimilation or dialect contact? The role of internal and external factors in changes affecting palatals and rhotics in Argentine Spanish. In S. Frota, M. Vigario, & M.J. Freitas (Eds.), Prosodies: With special reference to Iberian languages (pp. 315–338). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. (2011). Broad-focus declaratives in Argentine Spanish contact and non-contact varieties. In C. Gabriel & C. Lleó (Eds.), Intonational phrasing in Romance and Germanic: Crosslinguistic and bilingual studies (pp. 183–212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enbe, C., & Tobin, Y. (2011). Phonology as human behavior: The prosody of normal and pathological speech of Buenos Aires Spanish. In B. Jonge & Y. Tobin (Eds.), Linguistic theory and empirical evidence (pp. 197–217). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estebas-Vilaplana, E. (2010). The role of duration in intonational modeling: A comparative study of Peninsular and Argentinean Spanish. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 23, 153–173.Google Scholar
Feizollahi, Z., & Soukup, B. (2011). The role of intonation in Austrian listeners’ perceptions of standard-dialect shifting: An experimental approach. In F. Gregersen, J. Parrott, P. Quist (Eds.), Language variation: European perspectives, III (pp. 31–42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fontanella de Weinberg, M.B. (1971). La entonación del español de Córdoba (Argentina) Thesaurus: Boletín del Instituto Caro y Cuervo, 26(1), 11–21.Google Scholar
. (1980). Three intonational systems of Argentinian Spanish. In L.R. Waugh & C.H. van Schooneveld (Eds.), The melody of language (pp. 115–126). Baltimore MD: Univ. Park Press.Google Scholar
Gabriel, C. (2010). On focus, prosody, and word order in Argentinean Spanish: A Minimalist OT account. Revista Virtual De Estudos Da Linguagem, 8([Supplement 4]), 183–222.Google Scholar
Gabriel, C., Feldhausen, I., Pešková, A., Colantoni, L., Lee, S., Arana, V., & Labastía, L. (2010). Argentinian Spanish intonation. In P. Prieto & P. Roseano (Eds.), Transcription of intonation of the Spanish language (pp. 285–317). Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Gabriel, C., Feldhausen, I., & Pešková, A. (2011). Prosodic phrasing in Porteño Spanish. In C. Gabriel & C. Lleó (Eds.), Intonational phrasing in Romance and Germanic: Crosslinguistic and bilingual studies (pp. 153–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, C., Pešková, A., Labastía, L., & Blázquez, B. (2013). La entonación en el español de Buenos Aires. In L. Colantoni & C. Rodríguez Louro (Eds.), Perspectivas teóricas y experimentales sobre el español de la Argentina (pp. 99–115). Frankfurt: Vervuert.Google Scholar
Gooskens, C. (1997). On the role of prosodic and verbal information in the perception of Dutch and English Language varieties. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.
Hualde, J. (2002). Intonation in Romance. Probus: International Journal of Latin and Romance Linguistics, 14(1), 1–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaisse, E. (2001). The long fall: An intonational melody of Argentinian Spanish. In J. Herschensohn, Mallen, E., & Zagona, K. (Eds.), Features and interfaces in Romance, (pp. 147–160) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labastía, L. (2006). Prosodic prominence in Argentinian Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language Studies, 38(10), 1677–1705. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lang, J. (2010). Pre-tonic vowel lengthening in the Spanish of Córdoba, Argentina. Poster presented at Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Indiana University, Bloomington.
Malmberg, B. (1950). Études sur la Phonétique de l’Espagnol Parlé en Argentine. Lund: Glerrup.Google Scholar
Pešková, A., Feldhausen, I., Kireva, E., & Gabriel, C. (2012). Diachronic prosody of a contact variety: Analyzing Porteño Spanish spontaneous speech. In K. Braunmüller & C. Gabriel (Eds.), Multilingual individuals and multilingual societies (pp. 365–389). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, J., Gilles, P., Auer, P., & Selting, M. (2002). Identification of regional varieties by intonational cues: An experimental study on Hamburg and Berlin German. Language And Speech, 45(2), 115–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prevedello, N.L., & Federico, P. (1991). La inmigración italiana en la ciudad de Córdoba y el contacto de dos lenguas. Cuaderno del Cital: 1 Centro de Italianística. Córdoba: Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, A. (2008). The role of early alignment in broad/narrow focus declaratives in Buenos Aires Spanish. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 69(2), 592–592.Google Scholar
Rojas, E.M. (2000). El español en el noroeste. In M.B. Fontanella de Weinberg & M.N.E. Donni (Eds.), Español de la Argentina y sus variedades regionales (pp. 241–254). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Edicial.Google Scholar
Soukup, B. (2009). Dialect use as interaction strategy: A sociolinguistic study of contextualization, speech perception, and language attitudes in Austria. Wein: Braümuller.Google Scholar
Toledo, G. (1997). Contrato informativo y prosodia en el español de Buenos Aires. Estudios Filológicos, 32, 15–25.Google Scholar
. (1989). Señales prosódicas del foco. Revista Argentina de Lingüistica, 5(1–2), 205–230.Google Scholar
. (2000). H en el español de Buenos Aires. Langues et Linguistique, 26, 107–127.Google Scholar
van Bezooijen, R. & Gooskens, C. (1999). Identification of language varieties: The contribution of different linguistic levels. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 31–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leyden, K. & van Heuven, V. (2006). On the prosody of Orkney and Shetland dialects. Phonetica, 63, 149–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vidal de Battini, B. (1964). El español de la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Consejo Nacional de Educación. Google Scholar
Yorio, C.A. (1973). Phonological style in the dialect of Spanish of Córdoba, Argentina. Unpublished Doctorial Dissertation. University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Lang-Rigal, Jennifer
2020. Prosody perception meets language attitudes. In New Approaches to Language Attitudes in the Hispanic and Lusophone World [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 25], ► pp. 12 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.