Cover not available
Part of
New Perspectives on the Study of Ser and Estar
Edited by Isabel Pérez-Jiménez, Manuel Leonetti and Silvia Gumiel-Molina
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 5] 2015
► pp. 23–50

More than a copula

complex predicates with estar and the clitic se

| ILLA-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
| ILLA-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
This paper aims to provide an analysis of the construction consisting of the clitic se and the copula estar ‘beESTAR’ followed by an adjective (estarse + A) in Spanish. Combining the clitic with the copula triggers two changes in ‘estar + A’ predicates: first, it modifies the eventive structure and, as a consequence, a complex event is obtained that consists of an achievement followed by a result state; and second, it modifies the thematic role of the subject entity from theme to agent by increasing its degree of involvement in the event. This effect of the clitic is not limited to the copula estar ‘beESTAR’, but rather there is a parallel in other predicates with consumption verbs such as comer ‘to eat’ and movement verbs such as salir ‘to leave’.
Keywords: agentivity, clitic se, copulas, lexical aspect, states, theta theory
Published online: 28 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.5.02gar
References (45)
References
Adger, D., & Ramchand, G. (2003). Predication and equation. Linguistic Inquiry, 34(3), 325–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E., & Schäfer, F. (2006). The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In M. Fracarelli (Ed.), Phases of interpretation (pp. 187–212). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arche, M.J. (2006). Individuals in time: Tense, aspect and the individual/stage distinction. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, G. (2013). Agentive reflexive clitics and transitive se constructions in Spanish. Borealis. An international Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 2(2), 81–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Basilico, D. (2010). The se clitic and its relationship to paths. Probus, 22(2), 271–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertinetto, P.M. (1986). Tempo, aspetto e azione nel verbo italiano. Firenze, Italy: Accademia della Crusca.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, M. (1989). The semantics of gradation. In M. Bierwisch & E. Lang (Eds.), Dimensional adjectives: Grammatical structure and conceptual interpretation (pp. 71–237). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bogard, S. (2006). El clítico se. Valores y evolución. In C. Company (Dir.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Primera parte: la frase verbal, vol. 2 (pp. 755–870). México, D.F.: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Bosque I., & Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. (2009). Fundamentos de sintaxis formal. Madrid, Spain: Akal.Google Scholar
Bowers, J. (2001). Predication. In M. Baltin & C. Collins (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory (pp. 299–333). Oxford, England: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camacho, J. (2012). Ser and estar: Individual/stage level predicates or aspect? In J.I. Hualde, A. Olarrea & E. O’Rourke (Eds.), The handbook of hispanic linguistics (Blackwell handbooks in linguistics) (pp. 453–476). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. (1982). Where have all the adjectives gone? Studies in Language, 1, 19–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, A. (2012). A guide to IL and SL in Spanish: Properties, problems and proposals. Borealis. An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 1(2), 1–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Felser, C. (1999). Verbal complement clauses. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández, M.J. (2007). Sobre la oposición Individuo/Estadio en los predicados nominales. In A. Puigvert & I. Delgado (Coord.), Ex admiratione et amicitia. Homenaje a Ramón Santiago (pp. 377–394). Madrid, Spain: Ediciones del Orto.Google Scholar
Fernández Leborans, M.J. (1999). La predicación: las oraciones copulativas. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Dir.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 2357–2460). Madrid, Spain: RAE/Espasa.Google Scholar
Folli, R., & Harley, H. (2005). Consuming results in Italian and English: Flavours of v . In P. Kempchinsky & R. Slabakova (Eds.), Aspectual inquiries (pp. 95–120). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Fernández, L. (2011). Algunas observaciones sobre se aspectual. In J. Cuartero Otal, L. García Fernández & C. Sinner (Eds.), Estudios sobre perífrasis y aspecto (pp. 43–71). München, Germany: Peniope.Google Scholar
. (2000). La gramática de los complementos temporales. Madrid, Spain: Visor.Google Scholar
Gumiel-Molina, S., Moreno-Quibén, N., & Pérez-Jiménez, I. (2015). Comparison classes and the relative/absolute distinction: A degree-based compositional account of the ser/estar alternation in Spanish. To appear in B. Gehrke & E. Castroviejo (Eds.), Degree and manner modification across categories, special volume of Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, K., & Keyser, S.J. (1993). On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In K. Hale & S.J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 53–110). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, J. (2005). Event positions: Suppression and emergence. Theoretical Linguistics, 31(3), 349–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, A. (1996). Severing the external argument from its verb. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (Eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon (pp. 109–137). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1994). On external arguments. In E. Benedicto & J. Runner (Eds.), Functional projections (pp. 103–130). Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Krifka, M., Pelletier, F.J., Carlson, G.N., ter Meulen, A., Chierchia, G., & Link, G. (1995). Genericity: An introduction. In G.N. Carlson & F.J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 1–124). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marín, R. (2010). Spanish adjectives within bounds. In P. Cabredo-Hofherr & O. Matushansky (Eds.), Adjectives: Formal analyses in syntax and semantics (pp. 307–332). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, F. (2009). Les prédicats statifs: Étude sémantique et pragmatique. Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: De Boeck-Duculot.Google Scholar
de Miguel, E. (1999). El aspecto léxico. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Dir.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 2977–3060). Madrid, Spain: RAE/Espasa.Google Scholar
de Miguel, E., & Fernández Lagunilla, M. (2000). El operador aspectual se . Revista Española de Lingüística, 30(1), 13–44.Google Scholar
Morimoto, Y. (2008). Me estuve quieto: el concepto de estado y el llamado se aspectual. In I. Olza Moreno, M. Casado Velarde & R. González Ruiz (Coords.), Actas del XXXVII Simposio Internacional de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística (pp. 591–599). Pamplona, Spain: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra.Google Scholar
Nishida, C. (1994). The Spanish reflexive clitic se as an aspectual class marker. Linguistics, 32(3), 425–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsky, J. (1991). The syntax of event structure. Cognition, 41, 47–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, G. (2011). Minimalist semantics. In C. Boeckx (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism (pp. 449–471). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. (2008). Verb meaning and the lexicon. A first phase syntax. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2005). Post-davidsonianism. Theoretical Linguistics, 31(3), 359–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, S. (2004). Structuring events: A study in the semantics of lexical aspect. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sanz, M., & Laka, I. (2002). Oraciones transitivas con se: el modo de acción en la sintaxis. In C. Sánchez (Ed.), Las construcciones con se (pp. 309–338). Madrid, Spain: Visor.Google Scholar
Sigurđsson, H.A. (2012). Minimalist C/case. Linguistic Inquiry, 43(2), 191–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, C.S. (1991). The parameter of aspect. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stowell, T. (1991). The alignment of arguments in adjective phrases. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Perspectives on phrase structure: Heads and licensing (Syntax and Semantics 25) (pp. 105–135). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
di Tullio, A. (2012). La interpretación del se no argumental: la lectura agentiva frente a la lectura aspectual (Unpublished manuscript). Neuquén, Argentina: Universidad Nacional del Comahue.
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66(2), 143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zagona, K. (2012). Ser and estar: Phrase structure and aspect. In C. Nishida & C. Russi (Eds.), Building a bridge between linguistic communities of the Old and the New World, Cahiers Chronos, 25 (pp. 303–327). Amsterdam, The Netherlands and New York, NY: Rodopi.Google Scholar
. (1996). Compositionality of aspect: Evidence from Spanish aspectual SE. In C. Parodi, C. Quicoli, M. Saltarelli & M.L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Aspects of Romance Linguistics. Selected Papers from the LSRL XXIV (pp. 475–488). Washington, DC: Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Silvagni, Federico
2022. Whenestaris not there: A cross-linguistic analysis of individual/stage-level copular sentences in Romance. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 108 ff. DOI logo
Fábregas, Antonio
2021. SE in Spanish. Borealis – An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 10:2 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.