Article published in:New Perspectives on the Study of Ser and E star
Edited by Isabel Pérez-Jiménez, Manuel Leonetti and Silvia Gumiel-Molina
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 5] 2015
► pp. 51–84
Ser, estar and two different modifiers
Assuming a novel model based on a minimal cartography where every syntactic node in the structure encodes semantic information (see Romeu, 2014), in this paper I argue that the difference between ser and estar in Spanish is due to the presence of two different modifiers (Conjoint and Disjoint) of the node Stat (which introduces a state) in their respective underlying structures, similarly to the way that the prepositions a and en are distinguished in Romeu (2014). Although both ser and estar lexicalize Stat, ser can also lexicalize Conjoint, which gives the interpretation that there is only one state in the situation described, and estar also lexicalizes Disjoint, which gives the interpretation that the state encoded by Stat is linked to a different state and that there exists a link or relation between these two states. This contrast accounts for the different properties of ser and estar that have been pointed out in the literature: individual-level/stage-level opposition, permanent/temporary interpretation, scalar interpretation of estar, evidential use of estar, etc.
Keywords: Conjoint, copulas, Disjoint, estar, semantics, ser, Spanish, states, syntax
Published online: 28 October 2015
Cited by 1 other publications
Bazaco, Carmelo & Melvin González-Rivera
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Amritavalli, R., & Jayaseelan, K.A.
Bassa, M., & Romeu, J.
Chung, S., & McCloskey, J.
Escandell-Vidal, M.V., & Leonetti, M.
Fernández Leborans, M.J.
Gallego, Á. & Uriagereka, J.
(2011) The lexical syntax of ser and estar (Unpublished manuscript). Barcelona, Spain: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
Gallego, Á., & Uriagereka, J.
(2009) Estar=Ser+P. Paper presented at the XIX Colloquium on Generative Grammar. Universidad del País Vasco, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain: April 1–3, 2009.
Gumiel-Molina, S., Moreno-Quibén, N., & Pérez-Jiménez, I.
Hale, K., & Keyser, S.J.
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G.K.
(2012) What information structure tells us about individual/stage-level predicates. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 1, 1–32. Retrieved from http://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/borealis/article/view/2293/2163 DOI:
Raposo, E., & Uriagereka, J.
(2007) Nanosyntax class lectures. Center for Advanced Studies in Theoretical Linguistics, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway: Fall 2007.
(2006) The emergence of axial parts. In P. Svenonius & M. Pantcheva (Eds.), Adpositions, special issue of Nordlyd: Tromsø Working Papers in Language and Linguistics, 33(1) (pp. 49–77). Tromsø, Norway: University of Tromsø. Retrieved from http://www.ub.uit.no/baser/nordlyd/
de Swart, H.
(2001) Adjectival clues. Keynote speech at Acquisition of Spanish & Portuguese/Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL: October 11–14, 2001.
Zagona, K., & Contreras, H.