Cover not available
Part of
New Perspectives on the Study of Ser and Estar
Edited by Isabel Pérez-Jiménez, Manuel Leonetti and Silvia Gumiel-Molina
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 5] 2015
► pp. 239–266

Origins and development of adjectival passives in Spanish

a corpus study

| Gjøvik University College
ORCID logo | Université de Lille 3
To date, it has generally been assumed that most contemporary uses of Spanish estar ‘be.loc’ arose some time after the use of ser ‘be’, and that the former eventually took over most uses of the latter. Previous analyses of diachronic change in estar claim that the usage of this verb became generalized as a result of some reanalysis or grammaticalization change, presumably taking over the result state and locative uses of ser. In this paper we wish to go one step further and investigate the questions of how adjectival passive estar + participle emerged in Spanish and how it extended its usage at the expense of ser based on an empirical analysis of data coming from a large corpus of Spanish texts from the 12th to the 20th century. We propose that the first and most frequent uses of estar determined the way the participial construction emerged and further extended itself, gradually usurping uses of ser, and that the language change mechanism which drove this development was analogy. More specifically, we argue that this development was driven by the analogical relations established between participles appearing with this verb and locative prepositional phrases.
Keywords: adjectival passives, analogy, copula, language change, locative
Published online: 28 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.5.09mar
References (47)
References
Arche, M.J. (2006). Individuals in time: Tense, aspect and the individual/stage distinction. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, P. (1998). “Crow is sitting chasing them”: Grammaticalization and the verb to sit in the Mantharta languages, Western Australia. In A. Siewierska & J. Jung Song (Eds.), Case, typology and grammar: In honor of Barry J. Blake (Typological Studies in Language 38). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Batllori, M., & Roca, F. (2011). Grammaticalization of ser and estar in Romance. In D. Jonas, J. Whitman & A. Garrett (Eds.), Grammatical change: Origins, nature, outcomes. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bosque, I. (1990). Sobre el aspecto en los adjetivos y en los participios. In I. Bosque (Ed.), Tiempo y aspecto en español (pp. 177–210). Madrid, Spain: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Bouzet, J. (1953). Orígenes del empleo de estar: ensayo de sintaxis histórica. In Estudios dedicados a Menéndez Pidal (pp. 37–58). Madrid, Spain: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.Google Scholar
Bybee, J., & Hopper, P. (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., & Torres Cacoullos, R. (2008). Phonological and grammatical variation in exemplar models. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 1, 399–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cleveland, W.S. (1981). Lowess: A program for smoothing scatterplots by robust locally weighted regression. The American Statistician, 35(1), 54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, M. (2002). Discriminative training methods for hidden Markov models: Theory and experiments with perceptron algorithms. In Proceedings of the ACL-02 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing Volume 10 (pp. 1–8). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Corfis, I.A., O’Neill, J., & Beardsley, T.S. Jr. (Eds.) (1997). Early Celestina electronic texts and concordances. Madison, WI: Hispanic Seminary of Medieval Studies.Google Scholar
Coromines, J., & Pascual, J.A. (1954). Diccionario crítico etimológico de la lengua española. Madrid, Spain: Gredos.Google Scholar
Dowty, D. (1979). Word meaning and montague grammar. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emonds, J. (2005). Adjectival passives: The construction in the iron mask. In M. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, Volume I (pp. 16–60). Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gehrke, B. (2012). Passive states. In V. Demonte & L. McNally (Eds.), Telicity, change, and state: A cross-categorial view of event structure (pp. 185–211). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D. (1988). Metaphor as structure mapping: The relational shift. Child Development, 59, 47–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gruber, J. (1965). Studies in lexical relations. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Cambridge; MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (1990). The grammaticization of passive morphology. Studies in Language, 14(1), 25–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2002). World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herrera, M.T., & González de Fauve, M.E. (1997). Concordancias electrónicas del corpus médico español. Madison, WI: Hispanic Seminary of Medieval Studies.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R.S. (1990). Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kasten, L., Nitti, J., & Jonxis Henkemens, W. (Eds.) (1997). The electronic texts and concordances of the prose works of Alfonso X, El Sabio. Madison, WI: Hispanic Seminary of Medieval Studies.Google Scholar
Luján, M. (1981). The Spanish copulas as aspectual indicators. Lingua, 54, 165–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J. (1968). Existence, location, possession and transitivity. In B. van Rootselaar & J.F. Staal (Eds.), Logic, methodology and philosophy of science (pp. 495–504). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mangialavori, M.E. (2013). Conciliating states and locations: Towards a more comprehensive and in-depth account of the Spanish copula Estar. Studies in Hispanic & Lusophone Linguistics, 6(1), 37–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marín, R. (to appear). Ser y estar . In J. Gutiérrez-Rexach (Ed.), Enciclopedia de lingüística hispánica. London, England.
Mateu, J. (2009). Gradience and auxiliary selection in Old Catalan and Old Spanish. In P. Crisma & G. Longobardi (Eds.), Historical syntax and linguistic theory (pp. 176–193). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2002). Argument structure: Relational construal at the syntax semantics interface. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Barcelona, Spain: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
McWhorter, J. (1994). From focus marker to copula in Swahili. In K.E. Moore, D.A. Peterson & C. Wentum (Eds.), Special session on Historical Issues in African Languages: Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society (pp. 57–66). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society.
Mendeloff, H. (1964). The passive voice in Old Spanish. In D. Jacob, A. Kablitz, B. König, J. Küpper & C. Schmitt (Eds.), Romanistisches Jahrbuch, (pp. 269–287). De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nitti, J., & Kasten, L. (Eds.) (1997). The electronic texts and concordances of medieval Navarro-Aragonese manuscripts. Madison, WI: Hispanic Seminary of Medieval Studies.Google Scholar
O’Neill, J. (Ed.) (1999). Electronic texts and concordances of the Madison corpus of early Spanish manuscripts and printings. Madison, WI: Hispanic Seminary of Medieval Studies.Google Scholar
Padró, L., Collado, M., Reese, S., Lloberes, M., & Castellón, I. (2010). Freeling 2.1: Five years of open-source language processing tools. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, J. Odijk, S. Piperidis, M. Rosner & D. Tapias (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference. Valletta, Malta: European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
Padró, L., & Stanilovsky, E. (2012). Freeling 3.0: Towards wider multilinguality. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, J. Odijk, S. Piperidis, M. Rosner & D. Tapias (Eds.), Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference. Istambul, Turkey: European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
Pountain, C.J. (1985). Copulas, verbs of possession and auxiliaries in Old Spanish: The evidence from structurally interdependent changes. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, 62(4), 337–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Molina, J. (2010). La gramaticalización de los tiempos compuestos en español antiguo: cinco cambios diacrónicos. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Madrid, Spain: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
Sánchez, M.N., Herrera, M.T., & Zabía, M.P. (Eds.) (2003). Textos medievales misceláneos. Madison, WI: Hispanic Seminary of Medieval Studies.Google Scholar
Sánchez Marco, C. (2012). Tracing the development of Spanish participial constructions: An empirical study of semantic change. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Barcelona, Spain: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
Sánchez Marco, C., Boleda, G., & Padró, L. (2011). Extending the tool, or how to annotate historical language varieties. In Proceedings of the 5th ACL-HLT Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, and Humanities (LaTech) (pp. 1–9). Portland, OR.
Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2000). Lexesp: léxico informatizado del español. Barcelona, Spain: Edicions Universitat Barcelona.Google Scholar
Seiler, W. (1985). Imonda, a Papuan language (Pacific linguistics series B 93). Canberra, Australia: Department of Linguistics Research School of Pacific StudiesGoogle Scholar
Søgaard, A. (2010). Simple semi-supervised training of part-of-speech taggers. In Proceedings of the ACL 2010 Conference Short Papers (pp. 205–208). Uppsala, Sweden: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Spoustová, D., Hajic, J., Raab, J., & Spousta, M. (2009). Semi-supervised training for the averaged perceptron POS Tagger. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL (pp. 763–771). Athens, Greece: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Thornell, C. (1997). The Sango language and its lexicon. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Toutanova, K., Klein, D., Manning, C.D., & Singer, Y. (2003). Feature-rich partof-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology (pp. 173–180). Edmonton, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Waltman, F. (Ed.) (1999). Textos y concordancias electrónicos del Fuero general de Navarra. Madison, WI: Hispanic Seminary of Medieval Studies.Google Scholar
Wasow, T. (1977). Transformations and the lexicon. In Peter Culicover (Ed.), Formal Syntax (pp. 327–360). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Mangialavori Rasia, Mª Eugenia & Josep Ausensi
2023. Stativity and inchoativity. Spanish in Context 20:2 ► pp. 343 ff. DOI logo
Bartens, Angela & Ilpo Kempas
2022. «A praia está perto»: Zum Gebrauch des Verbsestarin Ausdrücken der statischen Lage im Portugiesischen. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 138:3 ► pp. 851 ff. DOI logo
Octavio de Toledo y Huerta, Álvaro S.
2019. Large Corpora and Historical Syntax: Consequences for the Study of Morphosyntactic Diffusion in the History of Spanish. Frontiers in Psychology 10 DOI logo
Gehrke, Berit & Cristina Marco
2014. Different by-phrases with adjectival and verbal passives: Evidence from Spanish corpus data. Lingua 149 ► pp. 188 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.