Cover not available
Part of
New Perspectives on the Study of Ser and Estar
Edited by Isabel Pérez-Jiménez, Manuel Leonetti and Silvia Gumiel-Molina
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 5] 2015
► pp. 267–292

Eventive and stative passives and copula selection in Canadian and American Heritage Speaker Spanish

 | University of Ottawa
ORCID logo | Macquarie University
 | University of Reading
 | University of Ottawa
 | Texas Tech University
 | Utrecht University
Spanish captures the difference between eventive and stative passives via an obligatory choice between two copula; verbal passives take the copula ser and adjectival passives take the copula estar. In this study, we compare and contrast US and Canadian heritage speakers of Spanish on their knowledge of this difference in relation to copula choice in Spanish. The backgrounds of the target groups differ significantly from each other in that only one of them, the Canadian group, has grown up in a societal multilingual environment. We discuss the results as being supportive of two non-mutually exclusive explanation factors: (a) French facilitates (bootstraps) the acquisition of eventive and stative passives and/or (b) the US/Canadian HS differences (e.g. status of bilingualism and the languages at stake) is a reflection of the uniqueness of the language contact situations and the effects this has on the input HSs receive.
Keywords: bilingualism, copula, estar, heritage speakers, passives, ser, syntax
Published online: 28 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.5.10val
References (51)
References
Beaudrie, S., & Fairclough, M. (Eds.) (2012). Spanish as a heritage language in the US: State of the field. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, 57(1), 289–300.Google Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., & Polinsky, M. (2013). Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics, 39, 129–181.Google Scholar
Bentley, D., & Eythórsson, T. (2004). Auxiliary selection and the semantics of unaccusativity. Lingua, 114, 447–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bley Vroman, R. (1983). The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity. Language learning, 33(1), 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J. (2009). Eventive and stative passives: The role of transfer in the acquisition of ser and estar by German and English L1 speakers. In J. Collentine et al. (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 11th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 27–38). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J., & Valenzuela, E. (2008). Eventive and stative passives in Spanish L2 acquisition: A matter of aspect. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(3), 323–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2006). The status of ser and estar in late and early bilingual L2 Spanish. In C. Klee & T. Face (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 7th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 100–109). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Camacho, J. (2012). Ser and estar: Individual/stage level predicates or aspect? In J.I. Hualde, A. Olarrea & E. O’Rourke (Eds.), The handbook of hispanic linguistics (Blackwell handbooks in linguistics) (pp. 453–476). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carrasco, A, & Fernández, L. (2006). Diccionario de perífrasis verbales. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Clements, C. (1988). The semantics and pragmatics of the Spanish < copula+ adjective> construction. Linguistics 26(5), 779–822. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delbecque, N. (1997). The Spanish copulas SER and ESTAR. In M. Verspoor, K.D. Lee & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Lexical and Syntactical constructions and the Construction of Meaning: Proceedings of the Bi-annual ICLA Meeting (pp. 247–270). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Falk, J. (1979). Ser y estar con atributos adjetivales: anotaciones sobre el empleo de la cópula en catalán y en castellano. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K.L. (2002a). The acquisition of Spanish copula choice and its relationship to language change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(3), 419–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2002b). Semantic transparency as a predictor of copula choice in second language acquisition. Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences, 40(2), 439–446.Google Scholar
. (2001). Changing norms, moving targets and the SLA of copula choice. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 5(1–2), 29–55.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K.L., & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2008). Variation in contemporary Spanish: Linguistic predictors of estar in four cases of language contact. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(3), 365–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2005). The acquisition of copula choice in instructed Spanish: The role of individual characteristics. In D. Eddington (Ed.), Studies in the Acquisition of the Hispanic Languages: Papers from the 6th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 66–77). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Gumiel-Molina, S., & Pérez-Jiménez, I. (2012). Aspectual composition in <ser/estar+adjective> structures: Adjectival scalarity and verbal aspect in copular constructions. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 1, 33–62. Retrieved from <[URL]> DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltsa, M., Tsimpli, I., & Rothman J. (2012). Syntax-discourse phenomena in heritage speakers and first language attriters: evidence from pronominal resolution (Unpublished manuscript). Presented at Wuppertal Workshop on Heritage Languages. Aristotle University of Thessalonik and University of Reading. Wuppertal, Germany: October, 4–6, 2012.
Lema, J. (1992). Distinguishing copular and aspectual auxiliaries: Spanish ser and estar . In J. Amastae, G. Goodall, M. Montalbetti & P. Phinney (Eds.), Contemporary research in Romance linguistics (pp. 257–274). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Leonetti, M. (1994). Ser y estar: estado de la cuestión. Barataria, 1, 182–205.Google Scholar
Levin, B., & Rappaport, M. (1986). The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry, 17(4), 623–661.Google Scholar
Luján, M. (1981). The Spanish copulas as aspectual indicators. Lingua, 54, 165–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maienborn, C. (2005). A discourse-based account of Spanish ser/estar . Linguistics, 43(1), 155–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. (2008). Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism: Re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2004). Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morphosyntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 125–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pascual y Cabo, D., & Rothman, J. (2012). The (il)logical problem of heritage speaker bilingualism and incomplete acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 33(4), 450–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Patten, B. (1985). The acquisition of ser and estar in adult second language learners: A preliminary investigation of transitional stages of competence. Hispania, 68, 399–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pires, A., & Rothman, J. (2009). Disentangling sources of incomplete acquisition: An explanation forcompetence divergence across heritage grammars. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2) 211–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky M. (2011). Reanalysis in adult heritage language: A case for attrition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 305–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M. (2008). Russian gender under incomplete acquisition. The Heritage Language Journal, 6(1), 40–70.Google Scholar
. (2007). Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 14, 191–262.Google Scholar
Roby, D.B. (2009). Aspect and the categorization of states: The case of ser and estar in Spanish. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J. (2009). Understanding the nature and outcomes of early bilingualism: Romance languages as heritage languages. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 155–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2007). Heritage speaker competence differences, language change and input type: Inflected infinitives in heritage Brazilian Portuguese. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11(4), 359–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2014). A prolegomenon to the construct of the native speaker: Heritage speaker bilinguals are natives too! Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 93–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1992). Ser and estar: A matter of aspect. In NELS 22 Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society (pp. 411–425). Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Schmitt, C., & Miller, K. (2007). Making discourse-dependent decisions: The case of the copulas ser and estar in Spanish. Lingua, 117(11), 1907–1929. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. (1994). Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. (1986). Bilingualism and language change: The extension of estar in Los Angeles Spanish. Language, 62, 587–608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C., & Montanari, S. (2008). The acquisition of ser, estar (and be) by a Spanish-English bilingual child: The early stages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(03), 341–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2004). Native language attrition and developmental instability at the syntax-discourse interface: Data, interpretations and methods. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 143–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2000). Syntactic optionality in non-native grammars. Second Language Research, 16(2), 93–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1993). Incomplete and divergent representations of unaccusativity in non-native grammars of Italian. Second Language Research, 9, 22–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vañó-Cerdá, A. (1982). Ser y estar+adjetivos: un estudio sincrónico y diacrónico. Tubingen, Germany: Narr.Google Scholar
Varela, S. (1992). Verbal and adjectival participles in Spanish. In C. Laeufer & T.A. Morgan (Eds.), Theoretical analyses in romance linguistics (pp. 219–234). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zagona, K. (2013). Tense, aspect and modality. In M. den Dikken (Ed.), Encyclopedia of generative syntax. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. (2012). Ser and estar: Phrase structure and aspect. In C. Nishida & C. Russi (Eds.), Building a bridge between linguistic communities of the Old and the New World, Cahiers Chronos, 25 (pp. 303–327). Amsterdam, The Netherlands and New York, NY: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Zeiger, S.L., & Liang, K.Y. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics, 42, 121–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Lafleur, France
2023. Conceptualisation de l'espace numérique dans l'enseignement-apprentissage des langues. Alsic 26:2 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.