Cover not available
Part of
Intonational Grammar in Ibero-Romance: Approaches across linguistic subfields
Edited by Meghan E. Armstrong, Nicholas Henriksen and Maria del Mar Vanrell
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 6] 2016
► pp. 45–68

Stylistic variation in the intonation of European Portuguese teenagers and adults

| Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa (FLUL)
| Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa (FLUL)
| Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores – Investigação e Desenvolvimento em Lisboa (INESC-ID)
The present study aims to investigate intonation contours in phrase-final position, in a corpus of spontaneous and prepared unscripted presentations from teenagers (14–15 years old) and adults, collected in a school context. Taking into account the differences between phrasing levels (ToBI breaks 3 and 4), we show that the frequency of low/falling vs. high/rising contours – mainly (H+)L L and (L+)H H – varies across oral presentation types. Adults and teenagers follow distinct strategies, though cross-gender differences are also a source of variation. We interpret these changes as an adaptation effect to the speaking styles specifically required at school, which call for the speaker′s effort to speak clearly and to keep the listeners attention, and ultimately as “intelligibility-oriented” speaking style changes.
Keywords: European Portuguese, intonation, stylistic variation, teenagers and adults
Published online: 31 March 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.6.03mat
References (52)
References
Barry, W. (1995). Phonetics and phonology of speaking styles. In K. Elenius & P. Branderud (Eds.), Proceedings of ICPhS 1995 (Vol. 2; pp. 4-10). Stockholm, Sweden.
Batista, F., Moniz, H., Trancoso, I., Mamede, N., & Mata, A.I. (2012a). Extending automatic transcripts in a unified data representation towards a prosodic-based metadata annotation and evaluation. Journal of Speech Sciences, 2(2), 113-136.Google Scholar
Batista, F., Moniz, H., Trancoso, I., & Mamede, N. (2012b). Bilingual experiments on automatic recovery of capitalization and punctuation of automatic speech transcripts. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 20(2), 474-485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benet, A., Lleó, C., & Cortés, S. (2011). Phrase boundary distribution in Catalan: Applying the prosodic hierarchy to spontaneous speech. In G. Christoph & C. Lleó (Eds.), Intonational phrasing in Romance and Germanic: Cross-linguistic and bilingual studies, (pp. 97-126). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blaauw, E. (1995). On the perceptual classification of spontaneous and read speech. Utrecht: LEd.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2013). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer, Version 5.3.56. Retrieved from <[URL]> (15 September 2013).Google Scholar
Cabarrão, V., & Mata, A.I. (2012). Prosodic and pragmatic properties of affirmative words in European Portuguese. In A. Botinis (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th ISEL Conference on Experimental Linguistics, ExLing 2012(pp. 33-36). Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
Clopper, C.G., & Smiljanic, R. (2011). Effects of gender and regional dialect on prosodic patterns in American English. Journal of Phonetics 39, 237–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duarte, I. (2000). Língua Portuguesa. Instrumentos de Análise. Lisboa: Universidade Aberta.Google Scholar
Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003). Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escudero, D., Aguilar, L., Vanrell, M. del Mar, & Prieto, P. (2012). Analysis of inter-transcriber consistency in the Cat_ToBI prosodic labeling system. Speech Communication, 54(4), 566-582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eskénazi, M. (1993). Trends in speaking styles research. In Proceedings of Eurospeech ’93 (pp. 501-505). Berlin.
Fagyal, Z., & Stewart, C.M. (2011). Prosodic style-shifting in preadolescent peer-group interactions in a working-class suburb of Paris. In F. Kern & M. Selting (Eds.), Ethnic styles of speaking in European metropolitan areas, (pp. 75-99). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Falé, I. (1995). Fragmento da prosódia do Português Europeu: As estruturas coordenadas. Master’s thesis, University of Lisbon.Google Scholar
. (2005). Percepção e reconhecimento da informação entoacional em Português Europeu. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Lisbon.
Falé, I., & Faria, I. (2006). Categorical perception of intonational contrasts in European Portuguese. In R. Hoffmann, H. Mixdorff, & O. Jokisch, (Eds.), Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2006 (pp. 69-72). Dresden, Germany.
Fleiss, J.L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, J., Grabe, E. & Warren, P. (2005). Intonational variation in four dialects of English: the high rising tone. In Sun-Ah Jun (Ed.) Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing, (pp. 390-409). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frota, S. (2000). Prosody and focus in European Portuguese. Phonological phrasing and intonation. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
. (2002). Nuclear falls and rises in European Portuguese: a phonological analysis of declarative and question intonation. Probus, 14, 113–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2014). The intonational phonology of European Portuguese. In Sun-Ah Jun (Ed.), Prosodic typology II (pp. 6-42). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guy, G., & Vonwiller, J. (1989). The high rising tone in Australian English. In P. Collins & D. Blair (Eds.), Australian English: The language of a new society, (pp. 21-34). St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Henriksen, N. (2013). Style, prosodic variation, and the social meaning of intonation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 43, 153-193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirschberg, J. (2000). A corpus-based approach to the study of speaking style. In M. Horne (Ed.), Prosody: Theory and experiment, Festschrift in honor of Gosta Bruce, (pp. 335-350). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, H. (2011). Gender difference in English intonation. In W.-S. Lee & E. Zee (Eds.), Proceedings of ICPhS 2011 (pp. 974-977), Hong Kong.
Labov, W. (1976). Sociolinguistique. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Ladd, D.R. (1996). Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Landis, J., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linneman, T.J. (2013). Intonation variation on a television game show. Gender & Society, 27(1), 82-105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y., Shriberg, E., Stolcke, A., Hillard, D., Ostendorf, M., & Harper, M. (2006). Enriching speech recognition with automatic detection of sentence boundaries and disfluencies. IEEE Transaction on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, 14(5), 1526–1540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mata, A.I. (1999). Para o estudo da entoação em fala espontânea e preparada no Português Europeu: Metodologia, resultados e implicações didácticas. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Lisbon.
. (2012). Intonational differences between speech tasks in school context. In A. Botinis (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th ISEL Conference on Experimental Linguistics, ExLing 2012 (pp. 81-84). Athens, Greece.
Mata, A.I., & Santos, A.L. (2010). On the intonation of confirmation seeking requests in child-directed speech. In M. Hasegawa-Johnson (Ed.), Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Mata, A.I., Moniz, H., Batista, F., & Hirschberg, J. (2014). Teenage and adult speech in school context: building and processing a corpus of European Portuguese. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, H. Loftsson, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, A. Moreno, J. Odijk, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2014, (pp. 3914-3919). Reykjavik, Iceland.Google Scholar
Moniz, H. (2013). Processing disfluencies in European Portuguese. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Lisbon.Google Scholar
Moniz, H., Trancoso, I., & Mata, A.I. (2010). Disfluencies and the perspective of prosodic fluency. In A. Esposito, N. Campbell, C. Vogel, A. Hussain, & A. Nijholt (Eds.), Development of multimodal interfaces: Active listening and synchrony, (pp. 382-396). Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moniz, H., Batista, F., Trancoso, I., & Mata, A.I. (2013). Automatic structural metadata identification based on multilayer prosodic information. In R. Eklund (Ed.), Proceedings of DISS 2013 (pp. 49-52). Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Moniz, H., Mata, A.I., Hirschberg, J., Batista, F., Rosenberg, A. & Trancoso, I. (2014). Extending AuToBI to prominence detection in European Portuguese. In N. Campbell, D. Gibbon, & D. Hirst (Eds.), Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2014 (pp. 280-284). Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
Neto, J., Meinedo, H., Viveiros, M., Cassaca, R., Martins C., & Caseiro, D. (2008). Broadcast news subtitling system in Portuguese. In A. Sayed (Ed.) Proceedings of ICASSP ’08 (pp. 1561–1564). Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
Ostendorf, M., Favre, B., Grishman, R., Hakkani-Tür, D., Harper, M., Hillard, D., Hirschberg, J., Ji, H., Kahn, J.G., Liu, Y., Maskey, S., Matusov, E., Ney, H., Rosenberg, A., Shriberg, E., Wang, W., & Wooters, C. (2008). Speech segmentation and spoken document processing. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 25(3), 59–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J., & Hirschberg, J. (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In P.R. Cohen, J. Morgan, & M.E. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in communication, (pp. 271-311). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prieto, P. (2014). The intonational phonology of Catalan. In S. Jun (Ed.), Prosodic typology II, (pp. 43-80). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prieto, P., Payà, M., & Vanrell, M.M. (2014). Estils prosòdics en el llenguatge publicitari. In D. Casals & J. Cornudella (Eds.), Publicitat en català. Estudis de llenguatge publicitari (Zeitschrift für Katalanistik, special volume 12), (pp. 5-22). Aachen: Shaker.Google Scholar
Serra, C.R. (2009). Realização e percepção de fronteiras prosódicas no Português do Brasil: fala espontânea e leitura. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Shepherd, M.A. (2011). Functional significance of rising-intonation declaratives in settings with special discursive norms. LSA Annual Meeting Extended Abstracts 2011 . Pittsburgh.
Silverman, K., E. Blaauw, J. Spitz, & J.F. Pitrelli. (1992a). A prosodic comparison of spontaneous speech and read speech. In J.J. Ohala, T.M. Nearey, B.L. Derwing, M. Hodge, & G.E. Wiebe (Eds.), Proceedings of ICSLP 92 , Vol. 2 (pp. 1299-1302). Banff, Canada.
Silverman, K., Beckman, M., Pitrelli, J., Ostendorf, M., Wightman, C., Price, P., Pierrehumbert, J., & Hirschberg, J. (1992b). TOBI: A standard for labeling English prosody. In J.J. Ohala, T.M. Nearey, B.L. Derwing, M. Hodge, & G.E. Wiebe (Eds.), Proceedings of ICSLP 92, Vol. 2 (pp. 867-870). Banff, Canada.Google Scholar
Sjölander, K., Beskow, J., Gustafson, J., Lewin, E., Carlson, R., & Granström, B. (1998). Webbased educational tools for speech technology. In R.H. Mannell & J. Robert-Ribes (Eds.), Proceedings of ICSLP’98 (pp. 3217-3220). Sydney, Australia.
Swerts, M. (1994). Prosodic features of discourse units. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Eindhoven.Google Scholar
Trask, R.L. (2010). Why do languages change? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Viana, C., Frota, S., Falé, I., Fernandes, F., Mascarenhas, I., Mata, A.I., Moniz, H. & Vigário, M. (2007). Towards a P_ToBI. Paper presented at the Workshop on the Transcription of Intonation in Ibero-Romance. University of Minho, Portugal. Downloadable from: <[URL] ; [URL]>
Wennerstrom, A. (2001). The music of everyday speech: Prosody and discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Paunović, Tatjana
2022. Uptalk in L2 English: the phonetic identity and perception of final declarative rises in Serbian EFL. Phonetica 79:6 ► pp. 551 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.