In this study, I first provide an in-depth study on the TSM
ho-V construction with a monosyllabic
V, especially on the morpho-syntactic function and the degree-introducing function of the morpheme
ho
‘ho
VD’. Then, based on
Liu’s (2020) study on the TSM
u-V construction, I comprehensively compare these two constructions, which reaches two major points. First, the
ho-V sequence and the
u-V sequence are intransitive compound verb. The V that
u ‘u
VD’ merges with can be a lexical verb or an aspectual verb; however, the V that
ho ‘ho
VD’ merges with must be a lexical verb. When forming a compound verb with a lexical verb,
u ‘u
VD’ has the same morpho-syntactic function as
ho ‘ho
VD’. Second,
these two morphemes differ in how to introduce the degree meaning for their corresponding construction. Namely, the dimension of
measurement carried by the measure function introduced by
u ‘u
VD’ is determined by what is measured;
however, the morpheme
ho ‘ho
VD’ intrinsically carries a dimension of measurement. Depending on what
the morpheme
ho ‘ho
VD’ modifies is the entity denoted by the subject in question or the eventuality
argument of V, the dimension of measurement carried by it can be interpreted as ‘be good for one to V’ or ‘it is easy for one to
V’.