Cover not available
Article published In:
The Unit of Processing in Chinese
Edited by Tianlin Wang
[International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 11:1] 2024
► pp. 30–55

Are separable words words or phrases?

A study of Chinese verb-complement structures

| Nankai University
| Nankai University
Both traditional linguistics and psycholinguistics have extensively explored the issue of the category that separable words belong to, yet different opinions persist. Building upon previous research, this study selects verb-complement structures as its focal point. Based on the number of internally insertable elements, these structures are categorized into verb-complement compounds, verb-complement compact structures, verb-complement loose structures, and verb-complement phrases. The study compares the processing similarities and differences between the four types of structures with and without inter-component spacing so that the “disconnected” and “connected” states of the four structures are investigated. Experimental results indicate that regardless of the insertion of spaces, the reaction times for processing verb-complement compounds, compact structures, and loose structures are shorter than those for phrases. In the comparison of presence and absence of spaces, compounds and compact structures exhibit greater consistency, whereas no significant differences are observed between loose structures and phrases. This suggests that the processing of verb-complement compact structures closely resembles that of words, while the processing of loose structures embodies characteristics of both compounds and phrases, yet differs from both words and phrases. This study demonstrates that based on the degree of internal expansion, separable words can be further classified into subcategories, existing in a transitional state between words and phrases, forming a continuous continuum with compounds and phrases.
Keywords: words, phrases, verb-complement structures, inter-component space, semantic judgment, processing mechanism
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Experimental design
    • 2.3Experimental materials
    • 2.4Experimental design
    • 2.5Data analysis
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1ACC
    • 3.2RT
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 17 June 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.00021.xia
References (34)
References
Baayen, R., Davidson, D. & Bates, D. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59 1, 390–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bai, L. L., & Chen, B. G. (2011). Hanzi xide de nianling dui cilei xinxi jiagong de yingxiang [The Effect of Chinese Character Acquisition Age on Word-like Information Processing]. Journal of Psychological Science, 2 1, 343–347.Google Scholar
Bai, X., Yan, G., Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C. & Rayner, K. (2008). Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception Performance, 34 ( 5 ), 1277–1287.Google Scholar
Barr, D., Levy, R., Scheepers, C. & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68 1, 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67 ( 1 ), 1–48.Google Scholar
Chao, Y. R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chen, B. G., Wang, L. X., Wang, L. L., & Peng, D. L. (2004). Cihui xide nianling he pinlv dui cihui shibie de yingxiang [The Effects of Age and Frequency of Vocabulary Acquisition on Word Recognition]. Journal of Psychological Science, 6 1, 1515–1517.Google Scholar
Du, C. (2012). Ci de qingxuxing yu jutixing dui cihui shibie de yingxiang yanjiu [A Study on the Influence of Word Emotionality and Concreteness on Lexical Recognition]. Theory and Practice of Education, 36 1, 42–44.Google Scholar
Duanmu, S. (1998). Wordhood in Chinese. New Approaches to Chinese Word Formation: Morphology, Phonology and the Lexicon in Modern and Ancient Chinese, edited by Packard, J.L, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 135–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Editorial Office for Dictionary in Linguistic Institute of Chinese Social Academy. 2016. Contemporary dictionary of Chinese (7th ed.). Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Fan, J. Y. (1958). Xingming zuhe jian de zi de yufa zuoyong [The grammatical function of de in adjective-noun constructions]. Studies of the Chinese Language, 5 1: 213–217.Google Scholar
Fan, X. (1981). Zenyang qubie xiandai hanyu de ci tong duanyu [How to Distinguish Words from Phrases in Modern Chinese]. DongYue Tribune, 4 1, 104–111.Google Scholar
Gu, J. X., Yu, L., & Ma, P. J. (2011). Jiyu nianzhuoxing de liheci biaozheng yanjiu – shenjingdian shenglixue shiyan zuozheng [Adhesion-based Characterization of Clutch Words – Experimental Evidence by Neuroelectrophysiology]. Modern Chinese, 4 1, 115–120.Google Scholar
Gu, J. X., Yang, Y. M., Ma, Y., & Shen, Z. Y. (2018). Liheci de yinxi tezheng ji qi shenjing jichu yanjiu [Study on Phonological Features of Detachable Words and their Neural Basis]. Studies in Language and Linguistics, 1 1, 63–73.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. (1984). Phrase structure, lexical integrity, and Chinese compounds. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 19.2 1, 53–78.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenth, R. V. (2016). Least-squares means: The R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software, 69(1), 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, L. Y. (2010). Xiandai hanyu dongbushi fuheci de jiegou yu gongneng yanjiu [A Study on the Structure and Function of Verb-complement Compounds in Modern Chinese]. Hebei Normal University.Google Scholar
Li, Q. H. (1983). Tan liheci de tedian he yongfa [On the Characteristics and Usage of Detachable Words]. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, 3 1, 91–100.Google Scholar
Lu, Z. W. (1964). Hanyu de gouci fa [A Study of Chinese Word-building]. Science Press.Google Scholar
Lü, Sh. X. (1963). Xiandai hanyu dan shuang yinjie wenti chu tan [A preliminary study of the problem of monosyllabism and disyllabism in modern Chinese], Studies of the Chinese Language, 11: 11–23.Google Scholar
Myers, J. (2006). Processing Chinese compounds: A survey of the literature. In: Libben, G., Jarema, G. (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 169–196.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Shao, J. M. (2007). Xiandai hanyu tonglun [General Modern Chinese]. Shanghai Educational Publishing House.Google Scholar
Song, X. (2013). Hanyu fuheci yuyi toumingdu de “shiyi” moshi fenxi [Analysis of the “Interpretation” Model of Semantic Transparency of Chinese Compound Words]. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Teaching & Studying Chinese as a Foreign Language Edition), 3 1, 48–52.Google Scholar
Wang, L. (1944). Zhongguo yufa lilun [Grammatical theory of Chinese]. Shanghai: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Xia, Q. S., Wang, L., & Peng, G. (2016). Nouns and verbs in Chinese are processed differently: Evidence from an ERP study on monosyllabic and disyllabic word processing. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 401, 66–78.Google Scholar
Yu, H. B. (1980). Ci、cuzu、cihui de qubie yu lianxi [Differences and Connections Among Words, Phrases and Vocabulary]. Journal of Southwest Minzu University(Humanities and Social Science), 3 1, 37–41.Google Scholar
Zhang, H. M. (1992). Topics in Chinese phrasal phonology. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Zhang, Q., Ding, J. H., Guo, C. Y. & Wang, Z. Y. (2003). Mingci yu dongci jiagong de ERP yanjiu [ERP Research on Noun and Verb Processing]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 6 1, 753–760.Google Scholar
Zhang, Q., Guo, C. Y., Ding, J. H., & Wang, Z. Y. (2006). Concreteness effects in the processing of Chinese words. Brain and Language, 96 1, 59–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhao, S. H. & Zhang, B. L. (1996). Liheci de queding he liheci de xingzhi [The Determination of Detachable Words and the Nature of Detachable Words]. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, 1 1, 50–51.Google Scholar
Zhang, S. S. & Jiang, H. (2010b). Cong jiyi bianma jiagong kan rennao zhong de jiben yuyan danwei – yixiang dui hanyu shuangyinjie yuyan danwei de EPRs yanjiu [Basic Linguistic Units in Human Brain from Memory Coding Processing -- An ERPs Study of Chinese Bisyllabic Language Units]. Studies in Language and Linguistics, 4 1, 81–84.Google Scholar
(2010a). Liheci shi ci haishi duanyu? – laizi shenjingdian shenglixue de zhengju [Are Detachable Words or Phrases?—Evidence from Neurophysiology]. Linguistic Sciences, 48 1, 486–498.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Wang, Tianlin
2024. Introduction. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.