Baker, C.L. (1995). Contrast, discourse prominence, and intensification, with special reference to locally free reflexives in British English. Language, 71(1), 63–101. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Battistella, E. (1989). Chinese reflexivization: A movement to INFL approach. Linguistics, 271, 987–1012. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bouchard, D. (1984). On the content of empty categories. Dordrecht: Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cheung, Y.-L.L. (2008). First language acquisition of elliptical structures in Cantonese. Poster presented at the
32nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development
, Boston, MA.
Chien, Y.-C., & Wexler, K. (1987). A comparison between Chinese-speaking and English-speaking children’s acquisition of reflexives and pronouns. Paper presented at the
12th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development
, Boston, MA.
Chien, Y.-C., & Wexler, K. (1990). Children’s knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition, 1(3), 225–295. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (1995). Categories and transformations. In The minimalist program (pp. 219–394). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N., & Lasnik, H. (1993). The theory of principles and parameters. In J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld & T. Vennemann (Eds.), Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research (Vol. 11) (pp. 506–569). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cole, P., Hermon, G., & Sung, L.-M. (1990). Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry, 21(1), 1–22.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crain, S., & McKee, C. (1985). The acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. In S. Berman, J. Choe & J. McDonough (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th North Eastern Linguistics Society (pp. 94–110). Amherst, MA: GLSA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crain, S., Thornton, R., Boster, C., Conway, L., Lillo-Martin, D., & Woodams, E. (1996). Quantification without qualification. Language Acquisition, 5(2), 83–153. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (1998). Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crain, S., & Wexler, K. (1999). Methodology in the study of language acquisition: A modularity approach. In T.K. Bhatia & W.C. Ritchie (Eds.), Handbook of child language acquisition (pp. 387–425). CA: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dalrymple, M. (1991). Against syntactic reconstruction. Xerox technical report, Xerox-PARC, Palo Alto, Cal.
Elbourne, P. (2005). On the acquisition of principle B. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(3), 333–365. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fiengo, R., & May, R. (1994). Indices and identity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fodor, J.A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foley, C., Núnez del Prado, Z., Barbier, I., & Lust, B. (1992a). On the strong continuity hypothesis: A study of pronoun coindexing. Paper presented at the
LSA Annual Meeting
, Philadelphia, PA.
Foley, C., Núnez del Prado, Z., Barbier, I., & Lust, B. (1992b). LF representation of pronouns in VP ellipsis: An argument for UG in the initial state. Paper presented at the
Boston University Conference on Language Development
, MA: Boston.
Foley, C., Núnez del Prado, Z., Barbier, I., & Lust, B. (1997). Operator-variable binding in the initial state: An argument from English VP ellipsis. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics: Papers on Language Acquisition, 151, 1–19. Ithaca, New York: Cornell Linguistic Circle, Cornell University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foley, C., Núnez del Prado, Z., Barbier, I., & Lust, B. (2003). Knowledge of variable binding in VP-ellipsis: Language acquisition research and theory converge. Syntax, 6(1), 52–83. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fox, D. (1998). Locality in variable binding. In P. Barbosa, D. Fox, P. Hagstrom, M. McGinnis & D. Pesetsky (Eds.), Is the best good enough? Optimality and competition in syntax (pp. 129–155). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guo, F.-F., Foley, C., Chien, Y.-C., Chang, C.-P., & Lust, B. (1996). Operator-variable binding in the initial state: A cross-linguistic study of VP ellipsis structures in Chinese and English. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale, 25(1), 3–34. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hankamer, J., & Sag, I. (1976). Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry, 71, 391–428.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hestvik, A. (1995). Reflexives and ellipsis. Natural Language Semantics, 31, 211–237. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoji, H. (1998). Null object and sloppy identity in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry, 291, 127–152. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, C.-T.J. (1988). Comments on Hasegawa’s paper. In T. Wako & M. Nakayama (Eds.), Proceedings of Japanese Syntax Workshop: Issues on Empty Categories (pp. 77–93). New London: Connecticut College.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, C.-T.J. (1991). Remarks on the status of the null object. In R. Freidin (Ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar (pp. 56–76). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, O.-H., & Kitagawa, Y. (2010). Selective reproduction in NP-ellipsis. Japanese/Korean. Linguistics, 191, 125–140.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, S. (1999). Sloppy/strict identity, empty objects, and NP ellipsis. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 81, 255–284. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lasnik, H. (1972). Analyses of negation in English. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT, Cambridge, MA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lebeaux, D. (1983). A distributional difference between reciprocals and reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry 141, 723–730.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lebeaux, D. (1985). Locality and anaphoric binding. The Linguistic Review, 41, 343–363. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lebeaux, D. (1995). Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing and identification. New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, H.-J. Grace. (2002). Ellipsis constructions in Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Southern California.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, R.-Y. (2010). Anaphoric dependencies: Reflexive binding and null arguments in child Mandarin. Ph.D. dissertation. City University of Hong Kong.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, R.-Y., Shi, D.-X., & Hu, J.-H. (2011a). Acquisition of elliptical constructions in child Mandarin. Poster presented at
IASCL-19
, Montreal, Canada.
Li, R.-Y., Shi, D.-X., & Hu, J.-H. (2011b). Children’s interpretation of elliptical structures with pronouns. Annual Research Forum of the Linguistic Society of Hong Kong. City University of Hong Kong.
Li, R.-Y., Shi, D.-X., & Hu, J.-H. (2012). The acquisition of elliptical constructions in child Mandarin. Zhongguo Yuwen: Studies of the Chinese Language, 31, 211–224.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lobeck, A. (1987). Syntactic constraints on VP ellipsis. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Washington.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lust, B. (2006). Child language: Acquisition and growth. New York: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manzini, R., & Wexler, K. (1987). Parameter, binding theory, and learnability. Linguistic Inquiry, 181, 413–444.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matsuo, A. (2007). Differing interpretations of null categories in English and Japanese VP ellipsis contexts. Language Acquisition, 14(1), 3–29. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matsuo, A., & Duffield, N. (2001). VP-ellipsis and anaphora in child language acquisition. Language Acquisition, 9(4), 301–327. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Otani, K., & Whitman, J. (1991). V-raising and VP ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry, 221, 345–358.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pan, H.-H. (1998). Null objects, VP-ellipsis, and sentence interpretation.
Workshop on ellipsis in conjunction
. Berlin.
Radford, A. (1996). Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax: The nature of early child grammar of English. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, T. (1983). Coreference and bound anaphora: A restatement of anaphora questions. Linguistic and Philosophy, 61, 47–88. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, T. (1986). Center and periphery in the grammar of anaphora. In B. Lust (Ed.), Studies in the acquisition of anaphora, Vol. 1, Defining the constraints. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, T., & Reuland, E. (1993). Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry, 241, 657–720.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reuland, E., & Reinhart, T. (1995). Pronouns, anaphors and Case. In S.O. HubertHaider & Sten Vikner (Eds.), Studies in comparative germanic syntax (pp. 241–269). Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roland, D., Dick, F., & Elman, J.L. (2007). Frequency of basic English grammatical structures: A corpus analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 571, 348–379 ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Russell, B. (1948). Human knowledge: Its scope and limits. London: Allen and Unwin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sag, I. (1976). Deletion and logical form. Ph.D. dissertation. The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thornton, R., & Wexler, K. (1999). Principle B, VP ellipsis, and interpretation in child grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, J.-L., & Stilling, J.-T. (1984). Chinese reflexives. In X.Y. Li et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the First Harbin Conference on Generative Grammar (pp. 100–109). Heilongjiang University.
Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua, 1061, 23–79. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wexler, K. (1999). Maturation and growth of grammar. In W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of child language acquisition (pp. 55–109). CA: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wexler, K., & Chien, Y.-C. (1985). The development of lexical anaphors and pronouns.
Papers and Reports on Child Language Development
, 241, 138–149. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wexler, K., & Manzini, M.R. (1987). Parameter and learnability in binding theory. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (Eds.), Parameter setting (pp. 41–77). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, E. (1977). Discourse and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry, 81, 101–139.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xu, L.-J. (2003). Remarks on VP-ellipsis in disguise. Linguistic Inquiry, 34(1), 163–171. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)