Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
Vol. 1:1 (2014) ► pp.35–70

The strict-sloppy reading of reflexives and pronouns in child Mandarin

| College of Foreign Languages, Tianjin Normal University
| Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
This paper investigates Mandarin-speaking children’s sensitivity to the strict-sloppy reading ambiguity of reflexives and pronouns in two coordinate elliptical constructions: the null object construction (NOC) and the Shi-constructions (ShiC). Two questions are addressed: (1) whether the strict reading of reflexives and pronouns are equally accessible to children; and (2) whether the strict reading is more accessible in the NOCs than in the ShiCs, given that the strict reading is pragmatically motivated (Guo et al., 1996; Foley et al., 2003) and that the NOCs are subject to the pragmatic factors (Xu, 2003). We examined 4-year-old Mandarin-speaking children and adults and found that children were sensitive to the interpretative idiosyncrasies of the two pro-forms whereas adults were sensitive to the interpretative discrepancies between the two constructions. Children’s non-adult performance indicates that their knowledge of language at the lexicon-syntax interface develops late in child grammar.
Keywords: strict/sloppy reading, Shi-construction, null object construction, reflexive/pronoun interpretation, child Mandarin
Published online: 5 September 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.1.1.02li
References (66)
Baker, C.L. (1995). Contrast, discourse prominence, and intensification, with special reference to locally free reflexives in British English. Language, 71(1), 63–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Battistella, E. (1989). Chinese reflexivization: A movement to INFL approach. Linguistics, 271, 987–1012. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, D. (1984). On the content of empty categories. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheung, Y.-L.L. (2008). First language acquisition of elliptical structures in Cantonese. Poster presented at the 32nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development , Boston, MA.
Chien, Y.-C., & Wexler, K. (1987). A comparison between Chinese-speaking and English-speaking children’s acquisition of reflexives and pronouns. Paper presented at the 12th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development , Boston, MA.
. (1990). Children’s knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition, 1(3), 225–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
. (1995). Categories and transformations. In The minimalist program (pp. 219–394). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., & Lasnik, H. (1993). The theory of principles and parameters. In J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld & T. Vennemann (Eds.), Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research (Vol. 11) (pp. 506–569). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cole, P., Hermon, G., & Sung, L.-M. (1990). Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry, 21(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Crain, S., & McKee, C. (1985). The acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. In S. Berman, J. Choe & J. McDonough (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th North Eastern Linguistics Society (pp. 94–110). Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Crain, S., Thornton, R., Boster, C., Conway, L., Lillo-Martin, D., & Woodams, E. (1996). Quantification without qualification. Language Acquisition, 5(2), 83–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (1998). Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crain, S., & Wexler, K. (1999). Methodology in the study of language acquisition: A modularity approach. In T.K. Bhatia & W.C. Ritchie (Eds.), Handbook of child language acquisition (pp. 387–425). CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, M. (1991). Against syntactic reconstruction. Xerox technical report, Xerox-PARC, Palo Alto, Cal.
Elbourne, P. (2005). On the acquisition of principle B. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(3), 333–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiengo, R., & May, R. (1994). Indices and identity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J.A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foley, C., Núnez del Prado, Z., Barbier, I., & Lust, B. (1992a). On the strong continuity hypothesis: A study of pronoun coindexing. Paper presented at the LSA Annual Meeting , Philadelphia, PA.
. (1992b). LF representation of pronouns in VP ellipsis: An argument for UG in the initial state. Paper presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development , MA: Boston.
. (1997). Operator-variable binding in the initial state: An argument from English VP ellipsis. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics: Papers on Language Acquisition, 151, 1–19. Ithaca, New York: Cornell Linguistic Circle, Cornell University.Google Scholar
. (2003). Knowledge of variable binding in VP-ellipsis: Language acquisition research and theory converge. Syntax, 6(1), 52–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, D. (1998). Locality in variable binding. In P. Barbosa, D. Fox, P. Hagstrom, M. McGinnis & D. Pesetsky (Eds.), Is the best good enough? Optimality and competition in syntax (pp. 129–155). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Guo, F.-F., Foley, C., Chien, Y.-C., Chang, C.-P., & Lust, B. (1996). Operator-variable binding in the initial state: A cross-linguistic study of VP ellipsis structures in Chinese and English. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale, 25(1), 3–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hankamer, J., & Sag, I. (1976). Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry, 71, 391–428.Google Scholar
Hestvik, A. (1995). Reflexives and ellipsis. Natural Language Semantics, 31, 211–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoji, H. (1998). Null object and sloppy identity in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry, 291, 127–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.-T.J. (1988). Comments on Hasegawa’s paper. In T. Wako & M. Nakayama (Eds.), Proceedings of Japanese Syntax Workshop: Issues on Empty Categories (pp. 77–93). New London: Connecticut College.Google Scholar
. (1991). Remarks on the status of the null object. In R. Freidin (Ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar (pp. 56–76). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kim, O.-H., & Kitagawa, Y. (2010). Selective reproduction in NP-ellipsis. Japanese/Korean. Linguistics, 191, 125–140.Google Scholar
Kim, S. (1999). Sloppy/strict identity, empty objects, and NP ellipsis. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 81, 255–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lasnik, H. (1972). Analyses of negation in English. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Lebeaux, D. (1983). A distributional difference between reciprocals and reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry 141, 723–730.Google Scholar
. (1985). Locality and anaphoric binding. The Linguistic Review, 41, 343–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1995). Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing and identification. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Li, H.-J. Grace. (2002). Ellipsis constructions in Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Li, R.-Y. (2010). Anaphoric dependencies: Reflexive binding and null arguments in child Mandarin. Ph.D. dissertation. City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Li, R.-Y., Shi, D.-X., & Hu, J.-H. (2011a). Acquisition of elliptical constructions in child Mandarin. Poster presented at IASCL-19 , Montreal, Canada.
. (2011b). Children’s interpretation of elliptical structures with pronouns. Annual Research Forum of the Linguistic Society of Hong Kong. City University of Hong Kong.
. (2012). The acquisition of elliptical constructions in child Mandarin. Zhongguo Yuwen: Studies of the Chinese Language, 31, 211–224.Google Scholar
Lobeck, A. (1987). Syntactic constraints on VP ellipsis. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Washington.Google Scholar
Lust, B. (2006). Child language: Acquisition and growth. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, R., & Wexler, K. (1987). Parameter, binding theory, and learnability. Linguistic Inquiry, 181, 413–444.Google Scholar
Matsuo, A. (2007). Differing interpretations of null categories in English and Japanese VP ellipsis contexts. Language Acquisition, 14(1), 3–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsuo, A., & Duffield, N. (2001). VP-ellipsis and anaphora in child language acquisition. Language Acquisition, 9(4), 301–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Otani, K., & Whitman, J. (1991). V-raising and VP ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry, 221, 345–358.Google Scholar
Pan, H.-H. (1998). Null objects, VP-ellipsis, and sentence interpretation. Workshop on ellipsis in conjunction . Berlin.
Radford, A. (1996). Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax: The nature of early child grammar of English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (1983). Coreference and bound anaphora: A restatement of anaphora questions. Linguistic and Philosophy, 61, 47–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1986). Center and periphery in the grammar of anaphora. In B. Lust (Ed.), Studies in the acquisition of anaphora, Vol. 1, Defining the constraints. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, T., & Reuland, E. (1993). Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry, 241, 657–720.Google Scholar
Reuland, E., & Reinhart, T. (1995). Pronouns, anaphors and Case. In S.O. HubertHaider & Sten Vikner (Eds.), Studies in comparative germanic syntax (pp. 241–269). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roland, D., Dick, F., & Elman, J.L. (2007). Frequency of basic English grammatical structures: A corpus analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 571, 348–379 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. (1948). Human knowledge: Its scope and limits. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Sag, I. (1976). Deletion and logical form. Ph.D. dissertation. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thornton, R., & Wexler, K. (1999). Principle B, VP ellipsis, and interpretation in child grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, J.-L., & Stilling, J.-T. (1984). Chinese reflexives. In X.Y. Li et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the First Harbin Conference on Generative Grammar (pp. 100–109). Heilongjiang University.
Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua, 1061, 23–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1999). Maturation and growth of grammar. In W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of child language acquisition (pp. 55–109). CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wexler, K., & Chien, Y.-C. (1985). The development of lexical anaphors and pronouns. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development , 241, 138–149. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Wexler, K., & Manzini, M.R. (1987). Parameter and learnability in binding theory. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (Eds.), Parameter setting (pp. 41–77). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, E. (1977). Discourse and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry, 81, 101–139.Google Scholar
Xu, L.-J. (2003). Remarks on VP-ellipsis in disguise. Linguistic Inquiry, 34(1), 163–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar