Stop codas in Old Chinese and Proto Sino-Tibetan
A lexical diffusion analysis
Reconstruction studies of Old Chinese (OC hereafter) and Proto Sino-Tibetan (PST hereafter) have yielded numerous significant discoveries related to the phonological histories of these two ancient languages. Despite recent advancements into OC and PST phonological histories, a few mysteries remain yet unsolved. One such mystery, the ‘stop coda’ problem, is as hotly debated now as it was when it was first raised seventy years ago. This long-running debate focuses on the existence and identity of the ‘stop codas’ in OC and in its parent language, PST. One reason why this debate has failed to reach a satisfactory conclusion is that the reconstruction methodology is limited, which assumes the Neogrammarian law of sound change. This law holds that sound change occurs without exception in every form that meets the structural description. Although this law applies to many sound changes in myriad world languages, it is not the only possible pathway of sound change. In this paper, I will argue that the key to the ‘stop-coda’ problem of OC belongs to another sound change type — lexical diffusion.
The organization of the paper is as follows. In Part One, I will introduce the background of the debate over the ‘stop codas’ in OC. Part Two reviews previous opposing analyses of the ‘stop coda’ debate. Part Three details my proposal for a lexical diffusion analysis of the ‘stop coda’ problem based on internal evidence in Chinese. Part Four investigates the problem using the Comparative Method based on external evidence from Tibetan and loan words from Chinese to Sino-Japanese. In Part Five, I will present my solution to the ‘stop coda’ problem, which is based on the analysis in the two preceding sections. Finally, in Part Six, I will discuss the general methodology of phonological reconstruction in light of the sound change mechanism.
References (40)
Baxter, W. (1992). A handbook of old Chinese phonology. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Baxter, W., & Sagart, L. (2013). Old Chinese: A new reconstruction. New York: Oxford University Press USA.
Benedict, P. (1972). Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bermudez-Otero, R. (2005). Diachronic phonology. In de Lacy (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of phonology, 417–518. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bodman, N. (1980). Proto-Chinese and Proto-Tibetan. In Frans van Coetsem & Linda R. Waugh (Eds.), Contributions to historical linguistics: Issues and materials, 34–199. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Chen, M, & Wang, W.S.-Y. (1975). Sound change: Actuation and implementation. Language, 511, 255–281.
Gong, H.-C. (2002). Collected papers on Sino-Tibetan linguistics. Taibei: Acedemia Sinica.
Greenberg, J.H. (1978). Universals of human language. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Halle, M., & Mohanan, K.P. (1985). Segmental phonology of modern English. Linguistic Inquiry, 161, 57–116.
Harris, J. (1989). Towards a lexical analysis of sound change in progress. Journal of Linguistics, 251, 35–56.
Hayes, K., & Seriade, D. (2004). Phonetically-based Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Jacobson, R. (1963). Essais de linguistique générale. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
Karlgren, B. (1926). Philology and Ancient China. Oslo: H. Aschenhoug & Co.
Karlgren, B. (1933). Word families in Chinese. BMFEA, 51.
Karlgren, B. (1957). Grammata Serica Recensa. BMFEA, 291, 1–332.
Kiparsky, P. (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. In I.-S. Yang (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected papers from SICOL-1981 (pp. 3–91). Seoul: Hanshin.
Kiparsky, P. (1985). Some consequences of lexical phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 21, 85–138.
Kiparsky, P. (1988). Phonological Change. In F. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey (Vol.11), 363–415. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kiparsky, P. (1995). The phonological basis of sound change. In J.A. Goldsmith (Ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 640–670. Oxford: Blackwell.
Labov, W. (1994). Principles of linguistics change: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
Leskien, A. (1876). Die Deklination im Slawisch{Litauischen und Germanischen. Leipzig: Weidmann.
Li, F-K. (1971). Shangguyin yanjiu. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, 9(1–2), 1-60.
Lu, Z. (1947). Guyin shuolue. Yanjing Xuebao Monograph, 201, 1–317.
Ma, X. (2003). Hanzangyu gailun. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.
Pan, W. (2000). Hanyu lishi yinyunxue. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.
Pulleyblank, E. (1984). Middle Chinese: A study in historical phonology. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Simon, W. (1930). Tibetisch-Chinesische Wortgleichungen: Ein Versuch. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Takashi, K. (1954). Chinese borrowings in prehistoric Japanese. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kobunkan.
Ting, P.-H. (1987). Shanggu yinshengzi ju fuyin yunweishuo buzheng. Guoli Taiwan Shifan Daxue guowen xuebao, 161, 59–66.
Trager, G. (1930). The Pronunciation of “Short A” in American Standard English. American Speech, V1, 396–400.
Trubetzkoy, N. (1939). Grundzüge der phonologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Wang, L. (1957). Hanyu shigao. Beijing: Kexue Chubanshe.
Wang, L. (1963). Hanyu yinyun. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.
Wang, S.-Y.W. (1969). Competing sound change as a cause of residue. Language, 451, 9–25.
Wang, S.-Y.W., & Lien, C. (1993). Bidirectional diffusion in sound change. In C. Jones (Ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives, 345–400. London: Longman.
Yu, M. (1984). Houhan Sanguo Fanhan duiyinpu. In Yu Min yuyanxue luwenji. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
Zhang, J. (1982). Guzangyu seyin yunwei duyin chutan. Minzu yuwen, 61, 17–30.
Zhengzhang, S. (1990). Shanggu rusheng yunwei de qingzhuo wenti. Yuyan yanjiu, 11, 67–74.
Zhengzhang, S. (2003). Shanggu yinxi. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.