Article published in:
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
Vol. 1:1 (2014) ► pp. 136156
References
端木三 [Duanmu, S] (2007) 重音、信息和语言的分类 [Stress, information, and language typology]. 语言科学 [Linguistic Sciences], 51, 3–16.Google Scholar
方 梅 [Fang, M] (2004) 汉语口语后置关系从句研究 [On post-nominal relative clauses in spoken Chinese]. In 庆祝中国语文创刊50周年学术论文集 [ Selected Papers from the International Symposium Marking the 50th Anniversary of the Publication of Zhongguo Yuwen ] (pp. 70–78). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
方 梅 [Fang, M] (2005) 篇章语法与汉语篇章语法研究 [Discourse grammar and Chinese discourse grammar study]. 中国社会科学 [Social Sciences in China], 51, 165–172.Google Scholar
方 梅 [Fang, M] (2008) 由背景化触发的两种句法结构——主语零形回指和描写性关系从句 [Two emergent grammatical structures motivated by background information packaging: A case study on the cataphoric zero subject clause and the descriptive relative clause]. 中国语文 [Zhongguo Yuwen], 41, 291-303.Google Scholar
刘丹青 [Liu, D] (1995) 语义优先还是语用优先——汉语语法学体系建设断想 [The priority of semantics or the priority of pragmatics: Thoughts on the construction of Chinese grammar system]. 语文研究 [Linguistic Research]. 21, 10–15.Google Scholar
刘丹青 [Liu, D] (2011) “有”字领有句的语义倾向和信息结构 [The semantic preference and information structure of the possessive construction with the verb “you”(have)]. 中国语文 [Zhongguo Yuwen]. 21, 99–109, 191.Google Scholar
刘丹青 [Liu, D], 徐烈炯 [Xu, L] (1998) 焦点与背景、话题及汉语“连”字句 [Focus, background, topic and Chinese “lian”(even) sentence]. 中国语文 [Zhongguo Yuwen]. 041, 243–252.Google Scholar
刘宁生 [Liu, N] (1994) 汉语怎样表达物体的空间关系 [How to present the spatial relationship between objects in Chinese]. 中国语文 [Zhongguo Yuwen], 31, 169–179.Google Scholar
刘宁生 [Liu, N] (1995) 汉语偏正结构的认知基础及其在语序类型学上的意义 [Cognitive basis of Chinese modifier-head structures and its significance in word order typology]. 中国语文 [Zhongguo Yuwen], 21, 81–89.Google Scholar
潘秋平 [Pan, Q] (2009) 从认知语法看上古汉语的“於” [The grammatical meaning of preposition yu in Archaic Chinese from a cognitive grammar perspective]. 汉语史学报 [Journal of Chinese Language History], 81, 134–148. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.Google Scholar
沈家煊 [Shen, J] (1999) 不对称和标记论 [Asymmetry and markedness]. Nanchang: Jiangxi Educational Publishing House.Google Scholar
沈家煊 [Shen, J] (2000) 说“偷”和“抢” [On “steal” and “rob”]. 中国语文 [Zhongguo Yuwen], 41, 19-24.Google Scholar
宋文辉 [Song, W] (2012) 汉语动结式的功能与认知研究 [On the function and cognition of chinese verb-resultative structure]. Draft of Program Report.
王洪君 [Wang, H] (2008) 汉语非线性音系学(增订版) [ Non-linear phonology of Chiense ]. Beijing: Peking University Press。Google Scholar
徐杰、李英哲 [Xu, J., & Li, Y] (1993) 焦点和两个非线形语法范畴:“否定”“疑问” [Focus and two non-linear syntactic categories: Negation and interrogation]. 中国语文 [Zhongguo Yuwen], 21, 81–92.Google Scholar
徐烈炯 [Xu, L] (2005) 焦点的语音表现 [Phonetic presentation of Focus]. In L. Xu & H. Pan (Eds.), 焦点结构和意义的研究 [ On focus structure and meaning ] (pp. 34–46). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
张伯江、方梅 [Zhang, B., & Fang, M] (1996) 汉语功能语法研究 [Functional studies of Chinese grammar]. Nanchang: Jiangxi Educational Publishing House.Google Scholar
周韧 [Zhou, R] (2011) 现代汉语韵律与语法的互动关系研究 [A research on the interactive relations between prosody and grammar in Mandarin]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J
(2006) From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. & M. Halle
(1968) Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Cinque, G
(1993) A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 241: 239–297.Google Scholar
Comrie, B
(1989) Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W
(2003) Typology and universals, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, E. & Cruse, D.A
(2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D
(1997) A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 4th edition. Oxford: Blackwell. (Translated by 沈家煊 [Shen, J]. 现代语言学词典 [A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics]. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W
(1994) Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John
(1987) The Discourse Basis of Ergativity, Language, 631: 805–855. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, V., & Green, M
(2006) Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, T
(1979) On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H
(1963) Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, ed. by Joseph H. Greenberg. 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Holme, R
(2009) Cognitive grammar and language teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, E.L., & Comrie, B
(1977) Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 81, 63–99.Google Scholar
Kim, A.H.-O
(1988) Preverbal focusing and type XXIII languages. In M. Hammond, E. Moravacsik & J. Wirth (Eds.), Studies in syntactic typology (pp. 147–172). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krupa, V
(1982) Syntactic typology and linearization. Language, 58(3), 639–645. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M
(1980)Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K
(1994) Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J.R
(2002) Cognitive grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, S.A
(1988) A discourse approach to the cross‑linguistic category ‘adjective’. In J. Hawkins (Ed.), Explaining language universals (pp. 167‑185). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1998) A discourse explanation for the cross-linguistic differences in the grammar of incorporation and negation. In A. Siewierska & J.J. Song (Eds.), Case, Typology and Grammar in honor of Barry J. Blake. (Vol.381). (pp. 309–341). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ungerer, F. & Schmid, H.J
(1996) An introduction to cognitive linguistics. Boston: Addison Wesley Longman limited.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa and Jean-Roger, Vergnaud
(2000) Phrasal stress and syntax. In Progress in Grammar, ed. Marc van Oostendorp and Elena Anagnostopoulou (an electronic book http://​www​.roquade​.nl​/meertens​/progress​-ingrammar​/index​.html). Publisher: Roquade, Amsterdam/Utrecht/Delft.Google Scholar