Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
Vol. 5:2 (2018) ► pp.171–194

Differentiating a construction into a structure

| University of Hawaii
This paper proposes a reconciliation of two opposite perspectives on a syntactic configuration and its associated semantic interpretation. Of these two, one is the view that a syntactic structure maps onto its semantic structure on a strict compositionality condition, and one is the view that a syntactic construction is not strictly compositional but has an inherent, endowed meaning, not compositionally derived. The proposed resolution attempts to settle the disagreement by differentiating an endowed-meaning construction into a compatible compositional-meaning structure, which in reverse is integrated into the original construction. As a result, structure and construction emerge as two sides of the same coin, and the disagreement is resolved.
Keywords: Theory of Interface, construction, structure, composition, culture
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Constructions as a rejection of formalism
  • 3.Constructions as derived from structures
  • 4.Segments in an altered construction
  • 5.Omissions characterizing constructions
  • 6.Famous examples of construction
  • 7.Tai’s principle of temporal sequence
  • 8.Universalism, nativism, and cultural choices
  • 9.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 13 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.17009.hsi
References (14)
References
Berwick, Robert C., and Noam Chomsky. (2016). Why only us: language and evolution. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro, and Sally McConnell-Ginet. (2000). Meaning and Grammar, 2nd edition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. (1995). Constructions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. (2006). Constructions at Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele, and Ray Jackendoff. (2004). The resultative as a family of constructions. Language 801:532–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heim, Irene, and Angelika Kratzer. (1998). Semantics in Generative Grammar. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Her, Onesoon. (1997). Interaction and Variation in the Chinese VO Constructions. Taipei: Crane Publishing.Google Scholar
Hsieh, Hsin-I. (1991). Interaction: some basic concepts. Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
Huang, C-T. James. (2015). On syntactic analyticity and parametric theory. In Chinese Syntax in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, ed. Audrey Li, Andrew Simpson, and Dylan Tsai, 1–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. (1992). Iconicity and generative grammar. Language 68(4).756–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tai, James H.-Y. (1985). Temporal sequence and Chinese word order. Iconicity in syntax, ed. by John Haiman, 49–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). Temporal sequence in Chinese: A rejoinder. Form and Function: Linguistic Studies in Honor of Shuanfan Huang, ed. By Lily I-wen Su, Chinfa Lien, and Kawai Chui, 331–351. Taipei: Crane.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics (2 volumes). Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wang, W. S.-Y. (1999). Language and people of China. Chinese Languages and Linguistics V: Interactions in Language, ed. by Yuen-mei Yin, I-li Yang, and Hui-chen Chan, 1–26. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar