Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
Vol. 5:2 (2018) ► pp.252–305

On the syntax-discourse interface of nonsententials in Mandarin

A cartographic solution

| National Tsing Hua University
This paper aims to develop the empirical and theoretical basis for the necessity of motivating a cartographic approach (Rizzi 1997; Cinque 1999) to the clausal structure of nonsententials (NSs) in Mandarin. Especially noteworthy about NSs is that they are able to encode clause type information, illocutionary force and the discourse roles speaker and hearer/addressee, though their structure is considerably reduced. Following the line of reasoning in Sigurðsson & Maling (2012) and Tsai (2015a, 2015b), I show that NSs have a fully-fledged CP structure, according to the effects exerted upon their interpretation. Adopting Haegeman’s (2014) sa*P analysis of the discourse particle in West Flemish, I argue that NSs contain a suprasentential structure, a Speech Act layer, dominating ForceP and responsible for the encoding of the speaker- hearer/addressee relation sensitive to the immediate context. Crucially, it is argued that the discourse properties surrounding NSs pertain to the articulated CP structure of NSs. The major consequence of the proposed analysis is to show that the theory of discourse is closely tied to the architecture of grammar in general, adding weight to the view that the transparent syntax-discourse mapping results from a set of functional projections layered in the CP periphery.
Keywords: nonsententials, speech act layer, discourse particles, sentence-final particles, Mandarin
Article outline
  • 1.Setting the stage
  • 2.Fragment answers and nonsententials
  • 3.Nonsententials in Mandarin
    • 3.1Fake nonsententials in Mandarin
    • 3.2NP nonsententials
    • 3.3AdjP/AdvP nonsententials
    • 3.4Summary
  • 4.The left periphery of NSs in Mandarin
    • 4.1Sentence-final particles in NSs
    • 4.2The utterance-final ni as a vocative phrase
    • 4.3Discourse particles in Mandarin nonsententials: Eh2, oh and xu2
    • 4.4Summary
  • 5.The proposed analysis of NSs
    • 5.1Assumptions
    • 5.2Discourse particles and the vocative phrase: Sa 0-to-sa0* movement
    • 5.3The proposed structure and derivation of nonsententials
    • 5.4Sentential syntactic structures of NSs and content of the deleted XP
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.18001.jhe
References (53)
References
Adger, D. (2007). Three domains of finiteness: A minimalist perspective. In Irina Nikolaeva (Ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations (pp. 3–58). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barton, E. & Progovac, L. (2005). Nonsententials in minimalism. In R. Elugardo and R. J. Stainton (Eds.), Ellipsis and nonsentential speech (pp. 71–93). Netherlands: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barton, E. (1998). The grammar of telegraphic structures. Journal of English Linguistics, 26(1), 37–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chiang, Y.-C. Lucy. (2015). On right dislocation in Mandarin Chinese. MA thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Culicover, P. & Jackendoff, R. (2005). Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cat, C. (2013). Root phenomena as interface phenomena: Evidence from non-sententials. In Folli, R., Sevdali, C. and Truswell, R. (Eds.), Syntax and its limits, (pp. 122–136). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cat, C. & Tsoulas, G. (2006). The structure of fragments in (child) French. In A. Belleti, E. Bennati, C. Chesi, E. Di Domenico, I. Ferrari (Eds.), Language acquisition and development proceedings of GALA 2005 (pp. 142–147). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Press.Google Scholar
Erlewine, M. Y. (2017). Low sentence-final particles in Mandarin Chinese and the Final-over-Final Constraint. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 261, 37–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Espinal, M. T. (2013). On the structure of vocatives. In Barbara Sonnenhauser and Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna (Eds.), Vocative!: Addressing between system and performance (pp. 109–132). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fortin, C. (2007). Some (not all) nonsententials are only a phase. Lingua, 117(1), 67–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grano, T. (2017). Finiteness contrasts without Tense? A view from Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 26(3), 259–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, L. (2014). West Flemish verb-based discourse markers and the articulation of the speech act layer. Studia Linguistica, 68(1), 116–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, L. & Greco, Ciro. (2018). West Flemish V3 and the interaction of syntax and discourse. Journal Of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 21(1), 1–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, L. & Hill, V. (2013). The syntacticization of discourse. In Folli, R., R. Truswell and C. Sevdali (Eds.), Syntax and its limits (pp. 370–390). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, V. (2007). Vocatives and the pragmatic-syntax interface. Lingua, 1171, 2077–2105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hsu, C.-W. (2016). Pragmatic functions of Mandarin Chinese utterance-initial Particles: A case study of Eh2 and Oh. MA Thesis, National Taiwan University.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J. (1984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 151, 531–574.Google Scholar
(1988). Wo pao de kuai and Chinese phrase structure. Language, 641, 274–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J. Y.-H., Li, A. & Li, Y.-F. (2009). The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keiko, M. (2017). Very early utterances in child language: Implications for the minimalist theory. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, New Series, 47(2), 361–381.Google Scholar
Li, B. (2006). Chinese sentence-final particles and the syntax of the periphery. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Liao, W.-W. R. (2017). Remarks on the Final-over-Final Condition: A view from Chinese head-final structures. Studies in Chinese Linguistics, 38(2): 93–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, D.-C. (2011). The nature of interjections: Pro-sentences. Chinese Teaching in the World, 21, 147–158.Google Scholar
Liu, Y.-H., Pan, W.-Y. & Hu, Hua. (2001). Shiyong xiandai hanyu yufa (Modern Chinese grammar). The Commercial PressGoogle Scholar
Mao, T. & Meng, F. (2016). The cartographic project of the generative enterprise – An interview with Guglielmo Cinque. Language and Linguistics, 17(6), 917–936. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merchant, J. (2001). The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and identity in ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2004). Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27(6), 661–738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Small structures: A sententialist perspective. In Ljiljana Progovac, Kate Paesani, Eugenia Casielles and Ellen Barton (Eds.), The syntax of nonsententials: multidisciplinary perspectives [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 93] (pp. 77–91). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moro, A. (2003). Notes on vocative case: A case study in clause structure. In Quer Josep, Jan Schroten, Mauro Scorretti, Petra Sleeman and Els Verheugd (Eds.), Romance language and linguistics theory 2001 [Current Issues in Linguistics Theory 245] (pp. 247–261). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, G. L. (1985). Psychological explanations of deep and surface anaphora. Journal of Pragmatics, 91, 785–813. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pan, V. J., & Paul, W. (2016). Why Chinese sfps are neither optional nor disjunctors. Lingua, 1701, 23–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, W. (2014). Why particles are not particular: Sentence-final particles in Chinese as heads of a split CP. Studia Linguistica, 681, 77–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portner, P. (2004). Vocatives, topics, and imperatives. Talk given at the IMS Workshop on Information Structure.Google Scholar
(2005). Instructions for interpretation as separate performatives. In Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (Eds.), Information Structure and Grammar (pp. 407–425). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Progovac, L. (2006). The syntax of nonsententials: Small clauses and phrases at the root. In Ljiljana Progovac, Kate Paesani, Eugenia Casielles and Ellen Barton (Eds.), The syntax of nonsententials: Multidisciplinary perspectives [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 93] (pp. 33–61). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. (1993/1994). Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: The case of root. Language Acquisition, 31, 371–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar (pp. 281–338). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP Effects. In Lisa Cheng and Norbert Corver (Eds.), Wh-movement: Moving on (pp. 97–133). MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Sag, I. A. & Hankamer, J. (1984). Toward a theory of anaphoric processing. Linguistics and Philosophy, 71, 325–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. (1976). The classification of illocutionary acts. Language and Society, 51, 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, H. Á. & Maling, J. (2012). Silent heads. In Laura Brugé, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (Eds.), Functional heads: The cartography of syntactic structures Vol. 71 (pp. 368–378). New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stainton, R. (2006). Words and thoughts: Subsentences, ellipsis, and the philosophy of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sybesma, R. (2017). Finiteness. In Sybesma, R. P. E., Behr, W., Gu, Y., Handel, Z., Huang, C. T. J., Myers, J. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics Volume 21 (pp. 233–237). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ting, J. (2006). NegP and the particle Suo in Mandarin Chinese. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 32 (2), 71–92.Google Scholar
Tsai, W.-T. D. (2015a). A tale of two peripheries: Evidence from Chinse adverbials, light verbs, applicatives and object fronting. In Wei-tien Dylan Tsai (Ed.), The cartography of Chinese syntax (pp. 1–32). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2015b). On the Topography of Chinese modals. In Ur Shlonsky (Ed.), Beyond functional sequence: The cartography of syntactic structures Volume 101 (pp. 275–294). New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). On transitivizing unergatives and unaccusatives in Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented the 2nd International Workshop on Syntactic Cartography (IWSC), Beijing.
Valmala, V. (2007). The syntax of little things. Paper presented at the 17th Colloquiumon on Generative Grammar, Girona.
Wei, T.-C. (2016). Fragment answers in Mandarin Chinese. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 3(1), 100–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, N. N. To appear. Sentence-final aspect particles as finite markers in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics.