Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
Vol. 9:1 (2022) ► pp.108–142

On the emergence of a nonhuman bound pronoun in Tsou and its implications

| Academia Sinica

This paper investigates the extension of a third person human bound pronoun to cover a nonhuman function and its implications for the grammar of pronouns in the Formosan language Tsou. It is found that (i) the newly derived bound pronoun can encode not only a place or an animal but also a time; (ii) it can refer to either a singular or a plural; (iii) the semantic extension is restricted to the invisible singular set of bound pronouns; (v) it surfaces as a suffix rather than an enclitic; (vi) it triggers either ergative or possessive agreement. These findings have far-reaching implications. On the one hand, they enrich the already sophisticated system of pronouns of Tsou. On the other hand, they differentiate Tsou from other Formosan languages with bound pronouns and identify Tsou as a language like Archaic Chinese/French instead of English/Swedish.

Keywords: nonhuman, bound pronoun, invisible, singular, affix, clitic, ergative, Tsou
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A grammatical sketch
  • 3.Nonhuman use of the personal pronoun -si
    • 3.1Ergative function
    • 3.2Possessive function
    • 3.3Plural -si
    • 3.4Other extensions?
    • 3.5Summary
  • 4.The grammatical status of the nonhuman pronoun -si
    • 4.1Morphological status
    • 4.2Syntactic/Semantic properties
    • 4.3The nonhuman -si as an agreement suffix
  • 5.Grammatical/Semantic constraints
    • 5.1The person constraint
    • 5.2The case constraint
    • 5.3The visibility and plurality constraint
  • 6.Implications for the grammar of pronouns
  • 7.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 7 June 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.20012.cha
References
Aldridge, E.
(2004) Ergativity and word order in Austronesian languages. PhD dissertation. Cornell University.
(2015) Pronominal object shift in Archaic Chinese. In Theresa Biberauer & George Walkden (Eds.), Syntax over time: Lexical, morphological, and information-structural interactions (pp. 350–370). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Extraction asymmetries in ergative and accusative languages. In M. Y. Erlewine (Ed.), Proceedings of GLOW in Asia XI, vol. 1. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, E.
(2006) Clitic Doubling. In M. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, vol. 1 (pp. 519–581). Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. C.
(2008) The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belyaev, Oleg
(2016) Ergative gender agreement in Dargwa “backward control” or feature sharing? In D. Arnold & M. Butt & B. Crysmann & T. H. King & & S. Muller (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint 2016 Conference on Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and Lexical Functional Grammar, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland (pp. 83–103). CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Bhat, D. N. S.
(2004) Pronouns. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blust, R. & Trussel, S.
(2018) The Austronesian Comparative Dictionary, web edition. [URL]
Chang, A. H.-C.
(2018) Páiwānyǔ yǔfǎ gàilùn [An Introduction to Paiwan Grammar]. Council for Indigenous Peoples.Google Scholar
Chang, H. Y.
(1997) Voice, case, and agreement in Seediq and Kavalan. PhD dissertation. National Tsing Hua University.
(2011) Transitivity, ergativity, and the status of o in Tsou. In J. H. Chang (Ed.), Yǔyán yǔ rènzhī: Tai Hao-Yi Xiānshēng qīzhì shòuqìng lùnwénjí [Language and cognition: Festschrift in honor of James Hao-Yi Tai on his 70th birthday] (pp. 277–308). Crane Publishing.Google Scholar
Chang, H. Y. & Pan, C. J.
(2018) Zōuyǔ yǔfǎ gàilùn [An introduction to Tsou grammar]. Council for Indigenous Peoples. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Chang, M. Y.-Y.
(2002) Nominalization in Tsou. Language and Linguistics, 3 (2), 335–348.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(2001) Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Coon, J.
(2017) Two types of ergative agreement: Implications for case. In C. Halpert & H. Kotek & C. van Urk (Eds.), A Pesky Set: papers for David Pesetsky (pp. 361–370). MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Forchheimer, P.
(1953) The category of person in language. Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franks, S. & King, T. H.
(2000) A Handbook of Slavic Clitics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gavruseva, E.
(2000) On the syntax of possessor extraction. Lingua, 110 (10), 743–772. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmer, A. & Billings, L.
(2014) Clitic pronouns in Seediq. In W. Arka & N. L. K. M. Indrawati (Eds.), Argument realisations and related constructions in Austronesian languages: papers from 12-ICAL, vol. 2 (pp. 111–139). ANU Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, P. & Hinchliffe, I.
(2013) Swedish: A comprehensive grammar. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, L. M.-C. & Hayung, T.
(2018) Tàiyǎyǔ yǔfǎ gàilùn [An introduction to Atayal grammar]. Council for Indigenous Peoples. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Huang, L. M.-C. & Zeitoun, E. & Yeh, M. M. & Wu, J. J.-L. & Chang, A. H.-C.
(1999) A typological study of pronouns in the Formosan languages. In S. H. Wang & F.-F. Tsao & C.-F. Lien (Eds.), Dìwǔjiè Hànyǔ yǔyánxué guójì yántǎohuì lùnwén xuǎnjí [Selected papers from the fifth international conference on Chinese linguistics] (pp. 165–198). Crane Publishing.Google Scholar
Jia, L.
(2006) Shànggǔ Hànyǔ dìsānrénchēng dàicí kǎochá [An investigation of the third person pronouns in Old Chinese]. MA thesis. Shaanxi Normal University. [in Chinese]
Jiang, H. & Billings, L.
(2015) Person-based ordering of pronominal clitics in Rikavung Puyuma: An inverse analysis. In A. Camp & Y. Otsuka & C. Stabile & N. Tanaka (Eds.), AFLA 21: The proceedings of the 21st meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association (pp. 87–106). Australian National University.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. L. & Comrie, B.
(1977) Noun phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic inquiry, 8 (1), 63–99.Google Scholar
Kummerow, D.
(2012) The Person that isn’t: On defining the third-person, negatively and positively so. Journal of Linguistics, 32 (2), 259–290.Google Scholar
Legate, J. A.
(2008) Morphological and abstract case. Linguistic Inquiry, 39 (1), 55–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahajan, A.
(1990) The A/A-bar Distinction and Movement Theory. PhD dissertation. MIT.
Miller, Philip H. & Sag, Ivan A.
(1997) French clitic movement without clitics or movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 15(3), 573–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pan, C-J.
(2010) The grammatical realization of temporal expressions in Tsou. Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Reid, N.
(1997) Class and Classifier in Ngan’gityemerri. In M. Harvey & N. Reid (Eds.), Nominal Classification in Aboriginal Australia (pp. 165–228). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Showalter, C.
(1986) Pronouns in Lyele. In U. Wiesemann (Ed.), Pronominal systems (pp. 205–216). Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Spencer, A. & Luís, A. R.
(2012) Clitics: An introduction. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stroński, S.
(2010) Variation of ergativity patterns in Indo-Aryan. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 46 ( 2 ), 237–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suñer, M.
(1988) The Role of Agreement in Clitic-Doubled Constructions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6 (3), 391–434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sung, L.-M.
(2018) Sàidékèyǔ yǔfǎ gàilùn [An introduction to Seediq grammar]. Council for Indigenous Peoples. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Yen, D. C.-J. & Billings, L.
(2011) Sequences of pronominal clitics in Mantauran Rukai: V-deletion and suppletion. In L. Eby Clemens & G. Scontras & M. Polinsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the eighteenth meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association (AFLA), Harvard University, Cambridge (MA), March 4–6 2011 (pp. 168–182). Linguistics Program, University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
(2014) The Cluster-internal Ordering of Clitics in Kavalan (East Formosan, Austronesian). In K. Carpenter & O. David & F. Lionnet & C. Sheil, & T. Stark & V. Wauters (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 523–538). [URL]
Zribi-Hertz, Anne & Diagne, Lamine
(2002) Clitic placement after syntax: Evidence from Wolof person and locative markers. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 201, 759–821. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
(1983) Cliticization vs. inflection: English N’T. Language, 59(3), 502–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar