Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
Vol. 9:2 (2022) ► pp.197–231

The quantity adjective duō in Chinese and the event quantity construction

| National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
In the duō event quantity construction, duō ‘much’ is a quantity adjective. What duō ‘much’ modifies is the root of the verb and the root has to move to the light verb position to be categorically defined. The quantity adjective duō ‘much’ functions to introduce a measure function which measures the event denoted by the verb along the dimension valued by the assignment function A, and the domain to which the measure function applies must be monotonic. So, the ‘modification’ relation between the quantity adjective duō ‘much’ and its modifyee essentially differs from that between a typical gradable adjective like tián ‘sweat’ and its modifyee. This explains how the quantity adjective duō ‘much’ differs from the typical adjective in syntax and semantics.
Keywords: event, measure function, monotonicity, quantity adjective, root
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The properties of the duō event quantity construction
    • 2.1The syntactic properties
    • 2.2The semantic properties
  • 3.Preliminaries
    • 3.1 Huang et al. (2009): The argument structure of Chinese lexical verbs
    • 3.2 Harley (2009)
    • 3.3 Wellwood (2015)
    • 4.Proposal: A root-based analysis
    • 5.Implications
      • 5.1The modifyee of ‘Deg duō’
      • 5.2The marker de
      • 5.3The types of aktionsarten
    • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 6 December 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.21005.liu
References (53)
References
Arad, M. (2005). Roots and patterns: Hebrew morphosyntax. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Bošković, Ž. (2005). On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica, 59 (1), 1–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, M.-M. (2013). The V-duō construction in Mandarin Chinese. Master Thesis, National Chiao Tung University.
Cheng, L. L.-S. (2007). Verb copying in Mandarin Chinese. In N. Corver & J. Nunes (Eds.), The copy theory of movement on the PF side (pp. 151–174). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Verb doubling in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 22(1), 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G. (1998). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6(4), 339–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cresswell, M. J. (1977). The semantics of degree. In B. Partee (Ed.), Montague grammar (pp. 261–292). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dowty, D. (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67(3), 547–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erlewine, M. Y. (2020). Anti-locality and subject extraction. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 5(1), 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ernst, T. (1996). Chinese evidence for semi-arguments. In C.-C. Cheng, J. L. Packard & J. H. S. Yoon (Eds.), Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 26(1/2), 117–132. Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois Urbana.Google Scholar
Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20 1 (pp. 111–176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, H. (2009). Compounding in distributed morphology. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 129–144). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heim, I., & Kratzer, A. (1998). Semantics in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hsieh, I.-T. (2019). Q-adjectives in Mandarin and the interpretation of nominal phrases. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 6(1), 46–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J. (1982). Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Huang, C.-T. J., Li, Y.-H. A., & Li, Y.-F. (2009). The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, S.-Z. (2006). Property theory, adjectives, and modification in Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 15(4), 343–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kratzer, A. (1996). Severing the external argument from its verb. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (Eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon (pp.109–137). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, M. (1992). Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In I. A. Sag & A. Szabolcsi (Eds.), Lexical matters (pp. 29–53). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (2005). Argument realization. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, L. (2010). Arguments for pseudo-resultative predicates. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 28(1), 135–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Liao, W.-W. (2004). The architecture of aspect and duration. Master Thesis, National Tsing Hua University.
Lin, T.-H. (2001). Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
Lin, J.-W. (2004). Hànyŭ de wángchéng dòngcí: Èrshí nián yĭhòu. (Accomplishment verbs in Mandarin Chinese: 20 years later). Paper presented at the 9th International Symposium on Chinese Language and Linguistics. National Taiwan University, Taiwan.
(2014). The adjective of quantity duō ‘many/much’ and differential comparatives in Mandarin Chinese. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 1(2), 163–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, C.-S. L. (2018). A comparative with two standards of comparison. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 5(2), 195–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). The adjective dà in Taiwanese Mandarin: Degree, measurement and roots. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 29(2), 119–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lü, S.-X. et al. (1980). Xiàndài hànyŭ bābăi cí (Eight hundred words in modern Chinese). Běijīng: Shāngwù Ynshūguăn.Google Scholar
Marantz, A. (1984). On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1997). No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 4(2), 201–225.Google Scholar
Merchant, J. (2019). Roots don’t select, categorial heads do: Lexical selection of PPs may vary by category. The Linguistic Review, 36(3), 325–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakanishi, K. (2004). On comparative quantification in the verbal domain. In R. B. Young (Ed.), Proceedings of SALT XIV 1, 179–196. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, W. (2002). Proxy categories in phrase structure theory and the Chinese VP. Cahiers de Linguistique-Asie Orientale, 311, 137–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, L. (2008). Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, G. (1997). Aspect and predication: The semantics of argument structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rothstein, S. (2004). Structuring events: A study in the semantics of lexical aspect. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarzschild, R. (2002). The grammar of measurement. In B. Jackson (Ed.), Proceedings of SALT XII1, 225–245. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
(2006). The role of dimensions in the syntax of noun phrase. Syntax, 9(1), 67–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Solt, S. (2015). Q-adjectives and the semantics of quantity. Journal of Semantics, 32(2), 221–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sybesma, R. (1999). The Mandarin vP. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tai, J. H.-Y. (1984). Verbs and times in Chinese: Vendler’s four categories. In T. David, M. Veena & D. Joseph (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on lexical semantics. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Tenny, C. (1992). The aspectual interface hypothesis. In I. A. Sag & A. Szabolcsi (Eds.), Lexical matters (pp.1–27). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
(1994). Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsao, F.-F. (1987). On the so-called ‘verb-coyping’ construction in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers’ Association, 21, 13–43.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stechow, A. (1984). Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics, 3(1), 1–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wellwood, A. (2015). On the semantics of comparison across categories. Linguistics and Philosophy, 38(1), 67–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). The meaning of more. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wellwood, A., Hacquard, V., & Pancheva, R. (2012). Measuring and comparing individuals and events. Journal of Semantics, 29(2), 207–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhu, D.-X. (1982). Yúfǎ jiǎngyì (Lecture notes on grammar). Běijīng: Shāngwù Ynshūguăn.Google Scholar