Review published In:
International Journal of Corpus LinguisticsVol. 25:4 (2020) ► pp.504–510
Book review
Love, R. (2020). Overcoming Challenges in Corpus Construction: The spoken British National Corpus 2014
Reviewed by
References (10)
Axelsson, K. (2018). Canonical tag questions in contemporary British English. In V. Brezina, R. Love, & K. Aijmer (Eds.), Corpus Approaches to Contemporary British Speech: Sociolinguistic Studies of the Spoken BNC2014 (pp. 96–119). Routledge. 
Biber, D. (1993). Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–257.
Fuchs, R. (2017). Do women (still) use more intensifiers than men? Recent change in the sociolinguistics of intensifiers in British English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3), 345–372.
Garside, R. (1995). Using CLAWS to annotate the British National Corpus. Oxford Text Archive. [URL]
Hardie, A. (2012). CQPweb – Combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(3), 380–409.
(2014). Modest XML for corpora: Not a standard, but a suggestion. ICAME Journal, 381, 73–103.
Hunston, S. (2008). Collection strategies and design decisions. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook (pp. 154–168). De Gruyter.
Laws, J., Ryder, C., & Jaworska, S. (2017). A diachronic corpus-based study into the effects of age and gender on the usage patterns of verb-forming suffixation in spoken British English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3), 375–402.
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Trint. (2015). Introducing the smart transcript by Trint [Computer software]. [URL]