Review published in:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 25:4 (2020) ► pp. 504510
References

References

Axelsson, K.
(2018) Canonical tag questions in contemporary British English. In V. Brezina, R. Love, & K. Aijmer (Eds.), Corpus Approaches to Contemporary British Speech: Sociolinguistic Studies of the Spoken BNC2014 (pp. 96–119). Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D.
(1993) Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, R.
(2017) Do women (still) use more intensifiers than men? Recent change in the sociolinguistics of intensifiers in British English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3), 345–372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garside, R.
(1995) Using CLAWS to annotate the British National Corpus. Oxford Text Archive. http://​www​.natcorp​.ox​.ac​.uk​/docs​/garside​_allc​.html
Hardie, A.
(2012) CQPweb – Combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(3), 380–409. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Modest XML for corpora: Not a standard, but a suggestion. ICAME Journal, 38, 73–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunston, S.
(2008) Collection strategies and design decisions. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook (pp. 154–168). De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Laws, J., Ryder, C., & Jaworska, S.
(2017) A diachronic corpus-based study into the effects of age and gender on the usage patterns of verb-forming suffixation in spoken British English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3), 375–402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A.
(2012) Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trint
(2015) Introducing the smart transcript by Trint [Computer software]. https://​trint​.com/