Cover not available
Review published In:
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Vol. 25:4 (2020) ► pp.504–510
Book review

Love, R. (2020). Overcoming Challenges in Corpus Construction: The spoken British National Corpus 2014

Reviewed by
| Xiamen University
Published online: 23 October 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.00032.wan
References
Axelsson, K.
(2018) Canonical tag questions in contemporary British English. In V. Brezina, R. Love, & K. Aijmer (Eds.), Corpus Approaches to Contemporary British Speech: Sociolinguistic Studies of the Spoken BNC2014 (pp. 96–119). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D.
(1993) Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, R.
(2017) Do women (still) use more intensifiers than men? Recent change in the sociolinguistics of intensifiers in British English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3), 345–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garside, R.
(1995) Using CLAWS to annotate the British National Corpus. Oxford Text Archive. [URL]
Hardie, A.
(2012) CQPweb – Combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(3), 380–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Modest XML for corpora: Not a standard, but a suggestion. ICAME Journal, 381, 73–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, S.
(2008) Collection strategies and design decisions. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook (pp. 154–168). De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Laws, J., Ryder, C., & Jaworska, S.
(2017) A diachronic corpus-based study into the effects of age and gender on the usage patterns of verb-forming suffixation in spoken British English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3), 375–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A.
(2012) Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trint
(2015) Introducing the smart transcript by Trint [Computer software]. [URL]