Cover not available
Article published In:
Corpus approaches to telecinematic language
Edited by Monika Bednarek, Valentin Werner and Marcia Veirano Pinto
[International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 26:1] 2021
► pp. 71–94

Language use in pop culture over three decades

A diachronic keyword analysis of Star Trek dialogues

| San Diego State University
| San Diego State University
Analyzing variation in language features in literature and telecinematic discourse provides valuable insights into society’s shifting values and perspectives. In this study, we carry out a keyword analysis on the language of three series of Star Trek television dialogues, broadcast in the 1960s, 1980s, and 1990s, from two perspectives: (i) keywords across the three series highlighting words that are unique to one series in contrast to the other two, providing insights about changes of foci across time; (ii) keywords in relation to gender depicting potential differences in gender roles and how these may change through time across the series.
Keywords: pop culture dialogues, telecinematic discourse, Star Trek , keywords, diachronic analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Keyword studies on TV series
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Keywords: Concept, methods, and approaches
    • 3.2The Star Trek corpus
    • 3.3Analytical tools
      • 3.3.1Python code
      • 3.3.2AntConc
  • 4.Findings
    • 4.1Lexical patterns across time
      • 4.1.1TOS
      • 4.1.2TNG
      • 4.1.3DS9
    • 4.2Lexical patterns in female talk
  • 5.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 2 November 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.00037.cso
References (50)
References
Allgaier, J. (2018). “Ready to beam up”: Star Trek and its interactions with science, research and technology. In S. Rabitsch, M. Gabriel, W. Elmenreich, & J. N. A. Brown (Eds.), Set Phasers to Teach! Star Trek in Research and Teaching (pp. 83–93). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Al-Surmi, M. (2012). Authenticity and TV shows: A multidimensional analysis perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 46(4), 671–694.Google Scholar
Anthony, L. (2019). AntConc (Version 3.5.8) [Computer software]. Waseda University. [URL]
Bednarek, M. (2010). The Language of Fictional Television: Drama and Identity. Continuum.Google Scholar
(2011). The stability of the televisual character: A corpus stylistic case study. In R. Piazza, M. Bednarek, & F. Rossi (Eds.), Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series (pp. 185–204). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Constructing ‘nerdiness’: Characterisation in The Big Bang Theory . Multilingua, 31(2), 199–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015a). “Wicked” women in contemporary pop culture: “Bad” language and gender in Weeds, Nurse Jackie, and Saving Grace . Text & Talk, 35(4), 431–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b). Corpus-assisted multimodal discourse analysis of television and film narratives. In P. Baker & T. McEnery (Eds.), Corpora and Discourse Studies (pp. 63–87). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Language and Television Series: A Linguistic Approach to TV Dialogues. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, M., & Zago, R. (2019). Bibliography of linguistic research on fictional (narrative, scripted) television series and films/movies (version 3, May 2019). [URL]
Berber Sardinha, T., & Veirano Pinto, M. (2017). American television and off-screen registers: A corpus-based comparison. Corpora, 17(1), 85–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Dimensions of variation across American television registers. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 24(1), 3–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berber Sardinha, T., Veirano Pinto, M., Mayer, C., Zuppardi, M. C., & Kauffmann, C. H. (2019). Adding registers to a previous multi-dimensional analysis. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues (pp. 165–186). Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. (1988). Variation in Speech and Writing. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, D. (2009). Register, Genre and Style. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johannson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Longman.Google Scholar
Bondi, M. (2010). Perspectives on keywords and keyness. In M. Bondi & M. Scott (Eds.), Keyness in Texts (pp. 1–20). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brezina, V., & Meyerhoff, M. (2014). Significant or random? A critical review of sociolinguistic generalisations based on large corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19(1), 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bubel, C. & Spitz, A. (2006). ‘One of the last vestiges of gender bias’: The characterization of women through the telling of dirty jokes in Ally McBeal . Humor 19(1), 71–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J. (2009). Keyness: Words, parts-of-speech and semantic categories in the character-talk of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet . International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(1), 29–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J., & Demmen, J. (2015). Keywords. In D. Biber & R. Reppen (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics (pp. 90–105). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daugs, R. (2017). On the development of modals and semi-modals in American English in the 19th and 20th centuries. In T. Hiltunen, J. McVeigh, & T. Säily (Eds.), Big and Rich Data in English Corpus Linguistics: Methods and Explorations. VARIENG. [URL]
Egbert, J., & Biber, D. (2019). Incorporating text dispersion into keyword analyses. Corpora, 14(1), 77–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer-Starcke, B. (2009). Keywords and frequent phrases of Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice: A corpus-stylistic analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(4), 492–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). Collocations in corpus-based language learning research: Identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence. Language Learning, 67(s1), 155–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Getman, J. L. (2015). A series on the edge: Social tension in Star Trek’s title cue. Journal of the Society for American Music, 9(3), 293–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gonzales, G. A. (2015). The Politics of Start Trek. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gregori-Signes, C. (2007). What do we laugh at? Gender representations in 3rd Rock from the Sun . In J. Santaemilia, P. Bou, S. Maruenda, & G. Zaragoza (Eds.), International Perspectives on Gender and Language (pp. 726–750). Universitat de Valencia.Google Scholar
(2017). “Apparently, women don’t know how to operate doors”: A corpus-based analysis of women stereotypes in the TV series 3rd Rock from the Sun . International Journal of English Studies, 17(2), 21–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, H., & Tullock, J. (2005). Science Fiction Audiences: Watching Star Trek and Doctor Who. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kwan, A. (2007). Seeking new civilizations: Race normativity in the Star Trek franchise. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 27(1), 59–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, G. (2013). Where have all the modals gone? An essay on the declining frequency of core modal auxiliaries in recent standard English. In J. I. Marín-Arerese, M. Carretero, J. Arús Hita, & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality (pp.95–115). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, M., & McIntyre, D. (2011). A case for corpus stylistics: Ian Fleming’s Casino Royale . English Text Construction, 4(2), 204–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandala, S. (2011). Star Trek: Voyager’s Seven of Nine. A case study of language and character in a televisual text. In R. Piazza, M. Bednarek, & F. Rossi (Eds.), Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series (pp. 205–223). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, D. (2003). Integrating multimodal analysis and the stylistics of drama: A multimodal perspective on Ian McKellen’s Richard III . Language and Literature, 17(4), 309–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Dialogue and characterization in Quentin Tarantino’s Reservoir Dogs: A corpus stylistic analysis. In D. McIntyre & B. Busse (Eds.), Language and Style: In Honour of Mick Short (pp. 162–182). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, M. (1985). Aspects of Text Structure: An Investigation of the Lexical Organization of Text. North Holland.Google Scholar
Putman, J. (2013). Terrorizing space: Star Trek, terrorism, and history. In N. R. Reagan (Ed.), Star Trek and History (pp. 143–157). Wiley.Google Scholar
Quaglio, P. (2008). Television dialogue and natural conversation: Linguistic similarities and functional differences. In A. Ädel & R. Reppen (Eds.), Corpora and Discourse: The Challenges of Different Settings (pp. 189–210). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Television Dialogue: The Sitcom Friends vs. Natural Conversation . Studies in Corpus LinguisticsJohn Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, C. W. (2013). Gender and sexuality in animated television sitcom interaction. Discourse and Communication, 7(2), 199–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rayson, P. (2008). From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 519–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rey, J. M. (2001). Changing gender roles in popular culture: Dialogue in Star Trek episodes from 1966 to 1993. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional Studies (pp. 138–56). Longman.Google Scholar
Saadia, M. (2016, September 8). The enduring lessons of “Star Trek”. The New Yorker. [URL]
Scott, M. (1997). PC analysis of key words – and key key words. System, 25(2), 233–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, M., & Tribble, C. (2006). Textual Patterns: Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trotta, J. (2018). Pop culture and linguistics – Is that, like, a thing now? In V. Werner (Ed.), The Language of Pop Culture (pp. 27–45). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walker, B. (2010). Wmatrix, key concepts and the narrators in Julian Barnes’s Talking It Over . In D. McIntyre & B. Busse (Eds.), Language and Style: In Honour of Mick Short (pp. 364–387). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werner, V. (2018). Linguistics and pop culture. Setting the scene(s). In V. Werner (Ed.), The Language of Pop Culture (pp. 3–26). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. (1986). Keywords. Fontana.Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Castro, Adrián
2024. Telecinematic stylistics: Language and style in fantasy TV series. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 33:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Liang-Ching, Kuei-Hu Chang, Chia-Heng Wu & Shin-Chi Chen
2024. A machine-based corpus optimization method for extracting domain-oriented technical words: an example of COVID-19 corpus data. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 46:4 ► pp. 9945 ff. DOI logo
Nazarovets, Serhii & Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
2024. The incidence of 11 movie titles in the titles of Scopus-indexed papers. Scientometrics 129:5 ► pp. 2911 ff. DOI logo
Akbary, Mary & Scott Jarvis
2023. Lexical diversity as a predictor of genre in TV shows. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 38:3 ► pp. 921 ff. DOI logo
Behrens, Tanja
2023. The language of men and women in Star Trek: The Original Series and Star Trek: Discovery . Linguistics Vanguard 9:s3 ► pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Flesch, Marie
2023. “Dude” and “Dudette”, “Bro” and “Sis”: A Diachronic Study of Four Address Terms in the TV Corpus. Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies :32/2 ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Montoro, Rocío & Valentin Werner
2023. Interdisciplinary approaches to the language of pop culture. English Text Construction 16:2 ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Rüdiger, Sofia & Claudia Lange
2023. Introduction to the special issue on “The language of science fiction”. Linguistics Vanguard 9:s3 ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Language and Characterisation in Television Series [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 106], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.